search for: 4gb

I am curious what should be the benchmark for making the choice of switching from 32bit to 64bit Linux? I have a few assumptions below. Is my logic sound? (This is a follow up to the "Adding RAM" thread) Assumptions: 1. 4GB Memory. The main benefit of 64bit mode is the ability to address more than 4GB of RAM. I assume that you use 64bit mode if you want to *efficiently* have more than 4GB of RAM, or intend to upgrade past 4GB in the foreseeable future. (I emphasize "efficiently" because PAE is an opti...

Hi, Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [root at ubercore1 ~]# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 3369544 2549668 819876 0 29008 2382360 -/+ buffers/cache: 138300 3231244 Swap: 6291448 0 6291448 I kno...

Hello all, I have a FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE amd64 VM, with 4GB RAM and ZFS, running on an ESX host. I installed and configured samba 4 with the following configuration: [global] workgroup = TST-DOM realm = TST-DOM.TLD.COM netbios name = SAMBA4 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U...

Does anyone know anything about a 4GB size limit on Samba 3.0.4 running on AIX 5.2 with a 32-bit kernel? We currently have files being transferred from a Windows 2000 server to an AIX machine, and if the files are larger than 4GB, they are getting mangled. Running samba at a high debug level shows the file pointer rewinding or becomi...

...regards, > Bruno Sousa > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] Em nome de > James Pearson > Enviada: quinta-feira, 22 de Junho de 2006 15:54 > Para: CentOS mailing list > Assunto: Re: [CentOS] x86 uniprocessor 4GB memory > > Bruno Sousa wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I'm currently using CentOS 4.3 (Server edition) in a HP DC 5100 with the >> IntelR 915GV chipset, powered by a PIV 3.0GHZ. >> >> Now I'm facing a problem, with memory. >> >> I got myse...

Dear All, I've stumbled over a problem with large print jobs coming from windows vista clients. Jobs above 4GB fail to be printed. The file in the spool directory grows to a size a little above 4GB and then printing is aborted. Transfer via smbclient -c print works fine and printing from the same windows client to a windows server also succeeds, so it seems both server and client basically can handle jobs a...

...                 ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State   Time(s) Domain-0                                   0     3202     8 r-----   5220.1 vm1                                  3     4095     2 -b----   3529.2 vm2                                  5     8191     4 -b----    399.0 [root@serverxen ~]# xm console 3 4gb seg fixup, process prelink (pid 10142), cs:ip 73:08083da1 4gb seg fixup, process prelink (pid 10142), cs:ip 73:08083da1 4gb seg fixup, process prelink (pid 10142), cs:ip 73:08083da1 4gb seg fixup, process prelink (pid 10142), cs:ip 73:08083da1 4gb seg fixup, process prelink (pid 10142), cs:ip 73:08...

I have problem with a TDM40B installation. When i modprobe wcfxs the error i get is the following: /lib/modules/2.4.19-4GB/misc/wcfxs.o: init_module: No such device Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg /lib/modules/2.4.19-4GB/misc/wcfxs.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.19-4GB/misc/wcfxs....

I just discovered that my xen hypervisor only believes that it has 3199 MB of memory, when there are 4GB inside the computer. I don''t know how long this has been this way, but I do not know how to try and force the hypervisor to realize how much memory it has. Any ideas how I can accomplish this? I am running CentOS 5 (RHEL 5), kernel 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5xen, x86_64, xen 3.0.3. ~Michael...

I run Samba 2.2.2 on any of there vendors/osversions/filesystems: o Solaris 8 / ufs o Tru64 Unix V5.0A / advfs o RedHat 7.1 / Kernel 2.4.2 / ext2fs all these are capable of handling large files (files with a 64-bit-offset larger than 4GB). At configure time, samba selects the proper compile flags (-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE, -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64) for use with large files. The problem: When I back up a Win2000 machine using ntbackup onto a file on a samba share, and the backup file is bigger than 4GB, the backup is corrupted. This h...

Hello, I have an odd problem on a dual processor, dual core Opteron system. Obviosously it is x86_64 so should have no problem large amounts of RAM. The system has 4 GB installed (2GB on each processor). If I boot the system with a fresh install of Debian Etch it sees all the memory fine. dmesg reports: Memory: 4107008k/5242880k available (1929k kernel code, 86836k reserved, 864k data, 176k

Package: xen-system-amd64 Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1 Severity: normal The xen kernel detects 3GB of memory instead of the full 4GB. When using the "normal" kernel 4GB is detected. On boot the 4GB is detected: root at ams-tc1-xen27:~# dmesg |grep Mem [ 0.000000] Memory: 3226132k/4980736k available (3426k kernel code, 788180k absent, 966424k reserved, 3312k data, 576k init) But only 3GB is used: root at ams-tc1-xe...

Hi there, I'm currently using CentOS 4.3 (Server edition) in a HP DC 5100 with the IntelR 915GV chipset, powered by a PIV 3.0GHZ. Now I'm facing a problem, with memory. I got myself 4GB of memory, the system bios detects it correctly, but in Linux can only see around 3.5gb memory. With the default kernel-smp (I use hyperthread) or with kernel-hugemem , I have the same results. Is there any way to workaround this issue? Thanks in advance, Bruno Sousa -------------- next part...

In NT Explorer, my 9GB usr shares show up as 4GB. Any suggestions? Doug Smith

I am unable to copy a file larger than 4GB to a samba fileserver! My config: - client is windows nt 4.0 sp 5 (I tried sp 6 without any change, I tried w2k, too) - server (now) is samba 3.0.6 on suse linux 9.0 kernel 2.4.21-99-default/I586 - share is on a reiserfs hardware-raid array with plenty of free space (explorer correctly _shows_ &gt...

> >> I've connected a Windows 7 client and logged in with a roaming profile >> user, copied some 4GB of data in the profile and logged out. Surely enough, >> the data was synchronized but when I login and logout again, the profile >> gets copied on the samba server in full versus just the modified data. > >> For instance, if the profile on the server has 4GB and I logout from...

...as users log in (via thunderbird), they are shown the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a given email, they get no response even if they wait upwards of 10 minutes. I believe that the problem has arisen from their huge inboxes, several users have inboxes in excess of 4GB. Do any of you know how I could split these large mbox files down in to manageable chunks of 1GB? Please be aware that I only have remote access to the server over a modest internet connection. Thanks again for any suggestions. Rob -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Users-w...

My backup script split filesystem dumps to files with size of 4,37 GB (4 588 544 kB). It's just an optimal size to fill out DVDs. At this moment I have to burn them from windows via smb-link becuase I didn't manage to do this task from FreeBSD console due to 2GB/4GB filesize restrictions (growisofs). I'm using freeware CDBurnerXP to burn my backups (ISO9660/UDF/Joliet), and they mount without problems on my FreeBSD BOX, files are fully readable too. However, burning gigabytes of data via slow (about 3.5MB/s) SMB network is just annoing. Is there *any*...

Are there any known or potential problems with Xen''s xmallocing the secondary cores'' IDT tables from a memory region whose physical address is higher than 4GB? Thanks Roger R. Cruz _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, sorry if this question has been asked before, I searched the archives and discovered the same question but no replies to it. Basically, I'm trying to transfer large files from a Windows NT4 machine to samba (version 3.0.20b, SuSE 10.0, reiserfs) and after 4GB the file gets filled with zeros. No such corruption occurs when transferring from Windows 2000. Does anyone know whether this is a Samba problem or a Windows problem? And if it is the former, is there a fix or workaround available? Thanks in advance for your help, Cheers, James.