Regarding the topic of the thread I think they're not that different from each other nowadays. I've been using an ATi graphics card for over a year and it's running pretty well. NVIDIA graphics cards are better. But AMD graphics cards nowadays aren't as bad as they sound. They're nearly equal.
patricia34 wrote:> Regarding the topic of the thread I think they're not that different from each other nowadays. I've been using an ATi graphics card for over a year and it's running pretty well. NVIDIA graphics cards are better. But AMD graphics cards nowadays aren't as bad as they sound. They're nearly equal.Right, tell that to everyone who bought RAGE game. It still doesn't work properly on most ATI cards. And RAGE is an OpenGL game.
nVidia is so much better for wine. Sadly, AMD APUs are a much better hardware than nVidia Ions... The AMD Catalyst drivers (proprietary) are buggy and too slow for wine. The open-source AMD drivers are even slower, too slow to actually run something in real life. Only if they had a decent driver...
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Buying a graphics card for Wine: ATI vs nVidia
- ATI Rage XL Driver for Centos 6.5
- Centos 6.2 ATI Rage XL on board graphics seg faults when setting up the screen saver
- Configure an ATI Radeon X1200 card?
- Graphics Flickering Issue w/ Wine & ati Radeon HD 4870