1.2 is on the way, more regression spotting needed! Yes, it makes the numbers worse, but it means Wine will get better ;-) - d. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani at redhat.com> Date: 13 June 2010 10:27 Subject: Re: Release plans To: wine-devel at winehq.org On 06/13/2010 10:39 AM, wylda at volny.cz wrote:> > Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers... > > 340 regressions<-- release announcement > 356 regressions<-- release announcement + 1week > 339 regressions<-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1) > 322 regressions<-- release announcement + 3weeks(rc2) > 325 regressions<-- release announcement + 4weeks > 326 regressions<-- release announcement + 5weeks(rc3) > > List of fixed bugs on rc3 release was long and impressive. Unfortunately > for regressions there is a stagnation.Regression bugs do get fixed too but "new" regressions are added at the same rate. A lot of the of the newly reported regressions happened before 1.2-rc1; it looks like people are using the release candidates to test their favorite app with and report the regression they find. And that is good; just screws up the statistics ;) bye ? ? ? ?michael
David Gerard-2 wrote:> > 1.2 is on the way, more regression spotting needed! > > Yes, it makes the numbers worse, but it means Wine will get better ;-) > > > - d. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani at redhat.com> > Date: 13 June 2010 10:27 > Subject: Re: Release plans > To: wine-devel at winehq.org > > > On 06/13/2010 10:39 AM, wylda at volny.cz wrote: >> >> Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers... >> >> 340 regressions<-- release announcement >> 356 regressions<-- release announcement + 1week >> 339 regressions<-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1) >> 322 regressions<-- release announcement + 3weeks(rc2) >> 325 regressions<-- release announcement + 4weeks >> 326 regressions<-- release announcement + 5weeks(rc3) >> >> List of fixed bugs on rc3 release was long and impressive. Unfortunately >> for regressions there is a stagnation. > > Regression bugs do get fixed too but "new" regressions are added at > the same rate. A lot of the of the newly reported regressions happened > before 1.2-rc1; it looks like people are using the release candidates > to test their favorite app with and report the regression they find. > And that is good; just screws up the statistics ;) > > bye > ? ? ? ?michael > > >Yeah sure, I will check on it and perhaps posted the results here! what about you? how long you've been using it? http://www.localinsuresearch.com/insurance-quotes/liability-auto-insurance-quotes-texas/ Liability auto insurance quotes texas [url=http://www.localinsuresearch.com/insurance-quotes/liability-auto-insurance-quotes-texas]Liability auto insurance quotes texas[/url] Esurance Insurance -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Please-check-1.2rc-with-your-applications%21-tp28872703p28875226.html Sent from the Wine - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Le Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:24:12 +0100, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> a ?crit :> 1.2 is on the way, more regression spotting needed! > > Yes, it makes the numbers worse, but it means Wine will get better ;-) > > > - d. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani at redhat.com> > Date: 13 June 2010 10:27 > Subject: Re: Release plans > To: wine-devel at winehq.org > > > On 06/13/2010 10:39 AM, wylda at volny.cz wrote: > > > > Hi, another week and Sunday gone so time for simple numbers... > > > > 340 regressions<-- release announcement > > 356 regressions<-- release announcement + 1week > > 339 regressions<-- release announcement + 2weeks(rc1) > > 322 regressions<-- release announcement + 3weeks(rc2) > > 325 regressions<-- release announcement + 4weeks > > 326 regressions<-- release announcement + 5weeks(rc3) > > > > List of fixed bugs on rc3 release was long and impressive. > > Unfortunately for regressions there is a stagnation. > > Regression bugs do get fixed too but "new" regressions are added at > the same rate. A lot of the of the newly reported regressions happened > before 1.2-rc1; it looks like people are using the release candidates > to test their favorite app with and report the regression they find. > And that is good; just screws up the statistics ;) > > bye > ? ? ? ?michael >[Bug 22618] doesn't seem to have been fixed in 1.2rc (the one provided with Ubuntu). Last version working is still 1.1.37. \bye -- Nicolas FRANCOIS | /\ http://nicolas.francois.free.fr | |__| X--/\\ We are the Micro$oft. _\_V Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. darthvader penguin