Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Polycom and Asterisk"
2007 Apr 11
2
FW: Polycom 501 issue with latest firmware : sluggish keys
Somebody was helpful enough to give me the very latest release of Polycom's
firmware (2.1.0). Unfortunately, I still get that issue.
So I'm stuck asking again: Anybody ever got that?
Mike
_____
From: Mike [mailto:list@virtutel.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 13:37
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Polycom 501 issue with latest
2007 Sep 21
4
Polycom 501 Phones Rebooting
Hello,
At one of our locations, we have started to see Polycom 501s
(running 1.6.7 firmware) randomly reboot. We have taken packet traces of the
phones to determine if there is something odd in the Layer 2 or 3 of the
network that might cause it, and have not seen anything strange. There are
no errors on the ports. This appears to be affecting POE powered as well as
AC powered phones. The Polycom
2007 Apr 13
4
Polycom 501 sluggish keys: found the problem!
Here is what I had to change on the phone1.cfg file:
I had this value in my 1.6.7 file, put in there following suggestions from
the Wiki
(http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Polycom+Soundpoint+IP+501) :
reg.1.server.1.expires="30"
Now, this worked flawlessly with 1.6.7. But with 2.x, this seizes up the
phone with a huge CPU load (approaching 100% at times) and makes it
2006 Nov 07
4
"Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset
Hi,
I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and
SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and
NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I've
noticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its
also been upgraded).
My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number
2007 Apr 11
2
Polycom 501 issue with latest firmware : sluggish keys
Hi,
I've upgraded a few Polycom 501 to SIP 2.0.3b (can't get 2.1.0 because of
Polycom's firmware policy, but this is the "latest publicly available" from
Polycom's web site).
I've noticed that some keys get "sticky" though. Soft buttons for example
(i.e. "end call") need to be pressed 2-3 times for them to react. I've
downgraded to
2006 Oct 19
2
Polycom boot error
I am having the same issue as below. Has this issue been solved or
does anyone know an answer? This error recently began and we have
multiple phones out of commission. PLEASE HELP!!
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-August/162841.html
How did you find out about 468*??? It's sure as poop not documented in
the Polycom Admin Guide anywhere.
-----Original Message-----
2003 May 16
10
TDMoE
In all the information on Asterisk it takes about TDMoE to link asterisk
servers together. Is this IAX??? How would I use TDMoE.
Maybe my first question should be, What is it???
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030516/cd74bddb/attachment.htm
2007 Jan 16
2
Polycom IP601 - some hints working, not others?
Are all of the sip phones in the same context?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Robert Jenkins
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:44 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Polycom IP601 - some hints working,
2007 Nov 28
1
Polycom MWI's will not turn off
Hello,
I have a bunch of Polycom 601's and Asterisk 1.4.13. The problem is that
the MWI indicators will never go off (The blinking red light and envelope in
the LCD).
I have tried to upgrade to 1.4.14 and all different SIP versions on the
Polycoms. I am now at 1.6.7
Here is the SIP Message that turns on the lights:
Scheduling destruction of SIP dialog '
2007 Jan 23
5
Snom 320 echo
Has anyone ever encountered an echo on the IP phone side of a call? It is an echo of the user's own voice. I believe that no one else in the office is experiencing this problem. The phone itself is a Snom 320. I've asked Snom for assistance since my source no longer carries Snom, but unlike previous times they've been slow to respond.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
2008 Mar 13
5
Mail Server
I need to setup a small mail server on a local network. It only needs SMTP ability as it's just so Asterisk can send out emails. The machine has sendmail installed. My primary mail server seems to be rejecting the messages. Some research says something isn't configured properly. What do I have to do so the outside world accepts emails from my Asterisk box? It is behind a NAT.
2008 Feb 20
6
Coppercom and Asterisk
My provider has a Coppercom switch. I have included the authentication information they gave me. How would I structure this in Asterisk to the registration and the entry in sip.conf?
User Name - 8159093010
Password - XXXXX
No Pin
Proxy - sip.essex1.com (10.1.3.2)
Outbound Proxy - proxy.essex1.com (63.164.210.14)
Change setting to use "outbound Proxy"
----------
Mike Hammett
2007 Sep 05
8
Ping
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070905/c62f4465/attachment.htm
2009 Jan 15
2
Asterisk - Trixbox
My provider migrated from an old EOL softswitch to Trixbox.
I have a number (8159093011) on a different server on a different network. It appears as though the incoming calls are trying to authenticate against that number, which isn't present on the box. Could someone help me decode this debugging output? I was calling 8159911010. My server is 208.100.1.33. Theirs is 208.1.87.235. I
2006 Jan 23
4
make linux26
I thought I read somewhere that you no longer have to do a special make command for the 2.6 kernel. Is this true, or should I still make linux26? I'm having problems getting anything zaptel to load properly.
----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2006 Dec 11
2
Asterisk Sends 180-RINGING to UA even withprogressinband=yes
Andrew,
I don't think it's a Polycom issue. We took Asterisk out of the picture and had our Polycom phones communicate directly with an Audiocodes PSTN gateway. Unlike Asterisk, the audiocodes do not send 180 Ringing before sending 183 Session Progress, and the polycom's play the correct tones in this case.
We WANT Asterisk to send progress tones in band. In our case it IS needed.
2007 Sep 06
2
Different Networks
I have multiple upstreams in my office. The primary upstream is having some issues with latency\jitter. I want to move the VoIP traffic to another interface.
I have the router set to send all traffic destined for "local" networks out the respective interfaces. Traffic destined to the Internet goes out one of the upstreams.
I can do this on a per-IP basis and have successfully done
2007 Nov 20
2
e911
One of my providers has a different SIP account for each number.
I have all of my users in one outbound context (caller ID passes fine).
How do I ensure that the callers get routed down their correct SIP account with my provider for e911 purposes without each having their own context?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
-------------- next part
2006 Jun 12
3
Snom high SIP ping time
I don't know everything that's going on as someone else has been working on the project, but it hasn't really been going anywhere, so I had some questions.
We've got some Snom 320s with Asterisk 1.2.9.1 (I believe). All was well (with a previous release), but the phones started to get real choppy. We are also running a softphone at this location and it was fine. The SIP qualify
2007 Mar 28
3
PoE - IEEE 802.3af
Hi,
I'm not clear on how to use Power--over-Ethernet, specifically with Polycom
phones.
What I understand, is that by buying the Polycom 501 with the 802.3af cable
bundle, I simply connect my phone, through the Polycom provided "special"
RJ-45 cable, into a PoE capable switch, and voil?!
Is this true? And if so, what happens when the Phone doesn't connect
directly to the