Mike
2007-Apr-11 10:37 UTC
[asterisk-users] Polycom 501 issue with latest firmware : sluggish keys
Hi, I've upgraded a few Polycom 501 to SIP 2.0.3b (can't get 2.1.0 because of Polycom's firmware policy, but this is the "latest publicly available" from Polycom's web site). I've noticed that some keys get "sticky" though. Soft buttons for example (i.e. "end call") need to be pressed 2-3 times for them to react. I've downgraded to 1.6.7, and the problem dissapeared. I can't imagine I'm the only one having that issue, and that issue was also present in 2.0.1 for me. Did anybody else have this problem? What did you do to fix it? Am I stuck with 1.6.7 forever? Mike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070411/91b8ab89/attachment.htm
Jim King
2007-Apr-11 13:08 UTC
[asterisk-users] Polycom 501 issue with latest firmware : sluggish keys
I've seen an issue like this from time to time on 601s, even with the latest firmware. Not just the softkeys, but also the dial keys. The phones seem to "run slow" sometimes, failing to respond to a key press right away but getting to it eventually. It usually clears up after a few seconds. Also, I've noticed that the 601s sometimes ignore key presses altogether, just as you describe. I have not yet found a solution for this problem... On Apr 11, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Mike wrote:> Hi, > > I've upgraded a few Polycom 501 to SIP 2.0.3b (can't get 2.1.0 > because of Polycom's firmware policy, but this is the "latest > publicly available" from Polycom's web site). > > I've noticed that some keys get "sticky" though. Soft buttons for > example (i.e. "end call") need to be pressed 2-3 times for them to > react. I've downgraded to 1.6.7, and the problem dissapeared. > > I can't imagine I'm the only one having that issue, and that issue > was also present in 2.0.1 for me. > > Did anybody else have this problem? What did you do to fix it? Am > I stuck with 1.6.7 forever? > > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070411/cd8801ae/attachment.htm
Ben Klang
2007-Apr-13 16:19 UTC
[asterisk-users] Cacti/Nagios monitoring, what do you want graphed.
On Thursday 12 April 2007 04:03:40 pm Brandon Kruse wrote:> > What are some of the numbers you guys want graphed? > > Anything that is a number, or any kind of information. >For me, it would be very useful to have that broken out into more specifc groups: Examples: * Calls per technology (Zap vs IAX2 vs SIP) (This is a big one as it helps with planning for bandwidth and PRI channel capacity) * Number of channels actively transcoding as opposed to natively bridging These would be interesting, but perhaps not as important: * Number of users in a given meetme conference * Calls per context * Calls per accountcode * Calls per IAX2 or SIP user * Average call duration Some of that may require specifying arguments and/or using a polling method other than SNMP. I realize those may be more complex than you intend to implement, but you asked :) /BAK/ -- Ben Klang Alkaloid Networks ben@alkaloid.net http://projects.alkaloid.net 404.475.4850