similar to: Grandstream and VLANs

Hello all, I'm looking to troubleshoot some echo issues and possibly "studdering" while using the speakerphone with the Intellitouch ITC3002. On the hardware end, i have a 2621 setup as the router with some policy maps for qos, and a 2900XL with cos priority set to 5. I have setup created 2 vlans currently (really small office), 1 for corp/data, and 2 voice vlan. Asterisk is on

Does anyone know if this phone can or does work with Asterisk ? I have a potential client who wants to throw away their current mitel ip system (keeps crashing on a regular basis - not good for a phone-based company), but are reluctant to purchase new handsets. Thanks. Julian.

I know this is not strictly an asterisk issue but it is related I guess. Just to let you know that after many calls to Mitel the consensus is that they will be releasing a new version of the 5220 that is dual boot (minet and SIP) next week or the week after. This firmware will only appear on NEW phones manufactured after the release date (no one could confirm but the 23rd of sept was

We are running our * server as a virtual PBX for 6 companies. I am having all of the Allison prompts plus our own custom IVR prompts being re-recorded for each company, in a different voice (marketing thing) with a different personality (perky, corporate, earthy) . I'm curious if someone could point out a dirty trick to get the voice to play right, for internal and external callers,

Using 1.0.9: If I have: exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/5555&SIP/12345@192.168.1.1) How can I return the DIALSTATUS variable for the second SIP channel ONLY if the second SIP channel is busy, regardless of the dialstatus of the first SIP channel? What I want is, if the second SIP channel is busy go to n+1 or n+101 regardless of the status of the first SIP channel. tia

I'm using tftp server that automatically loads on each reboot, for some reason the last 2 files fail to load each time. (and I think this has always been the case) Aborted 192.168.16.32 C:\Program Files\TFTP Desktop\1.0.5.18\cfg000b82005c24 Octet, Send 192.168.16.20 25 Jan 18:25 Error Aborted 192.168.16.32 C:\Program Files\TFTP

I'm using a Snom 320 in a CAP position and the receptionist wants to do blind transfers. OK, no problem so far. Now she has asked me how to UN-transfer a call, as in, she transfers a call and wants to hook the call back before it connects (she wanted to tell the caller additional information for example) I don't think that this is possible as once my dialplan starts using Dial()

the user you are connecting as should have full rights to /var/run/asterisk: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+non-root hth -----Original Message----- From: Erick Perez [mailto:eaperezh@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:28 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Unable to connect to remote asterisk (does /var/run/asterisk.ctl

Hello, I was attempting to throttle egress traffic to a specific rate using a tbf. As a starting point I used an example from the LARTC howto, which goes: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 I then attempt a large fetch from another machine via wget (~40 megs) and the rate was clamped down to about 12Kbytes/s. As this seemed too much, I gradually increased

> They instantly got us to look at the output of zttest and we found that this was (in their words) 'extremely low', with 'best' and > 'worst' readings of 99.975586% and 99.963379% respectively. Might want to give PCI latency setting a try, it helped for me. My ZTTEST would drop occasionally to 99.95% until I set: setpci -v -s 01:01.0 latency_timer=ff

I've seen lots of stuff go around about Grandstream firmware levels (in my case specifically the BT101/102). I'm just wondering what the currently accepted 'best' firmware version is to use? After seeing stuff going around about buggy firmware I want to know what I'm getting into before upping past my current 1.0.5.11. It's relatively stable, and the last thing I want

Hi, I'm using Vlans in my network as a way of preventing pier to pier communication - I only want nodes in the network to talk to the gateway (a linux box). I have successfully set up lots of sub interfaces using the vconfig too, one for each vlan. What I would like to be able to do is remove the ip address from each of these subinterfaces eth0.x and bridge them to eth0. I have successfully

Hello, Is it possible with a linux Bow to route différents VLANs, like a router cisco can does ? Thank for your answers Laurent Foucher _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Does anyone have VLAN tagging working from within a guest on vmware-server? I'm running a centos 4.5 guest on a centos 5 host with vmware server 1.04and I've tried creating vlans using both the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts method and just doing it from the cli via vconfig. Either way appears to work, the OS creates the vlans, but I think vmware's network adapter must be eating the

Hey gang, We have about 30 Cisco 79XX phones all running latest 7.5 SIP. We are also using all Cisco Switches and Routers. Everything works great except that when you reboot a phone it takes like 3-5 minutes for it to come up. The phones spend tons of time 'Configuring VLAN..' We don't run any VLANs. Is there some way to skip this? In the 'Network Settings' I have

OK, strange request but I want to bridge three vlans under linux 2.4. Bridging works fine with two vlans, but is failing to route when I add the third vlan. Situation is clearly to have Lan, internet and DMZ vlans. The reason they are vlans is that I am using a Linksys WRT54GS and hence you effectively have a 5 port hub on the back which can be segregated into flexible vlan groups. I

Running on Centos 5.6 with KVM... I was wondering if anyone had any luck configuring the NICs where eth0 and eth1 are bonded together with vlan support to a bridge? I noticed some threads show this as a possibility (http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2009-November/001417.html), but haven't had any luck implementing it. There also seems to be a bug with 5.6

Hello, I'm not sure what you mean, could you elaborate? Thanks, -- -- -- Christopher T. Aloi USA Datanet - Technical Support Engineer 318 South Clinton Street Syracuse, NY 13202 C: (315) 569 4033 O: (315) 579 7074 E: caloi@usadatanet.com <mailto:caloi@usadatanet.com> -- -- -- _____ From: Wojciech Tryc [mailto:Wojciech.Tryc@pikatech.com] Sent: Friday,

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be