Hi, You're quiet right, I'm using a 64 bits system and I was surprised by this file size limitation on such a system. My bad regarding the title : ) Cheers, mathias 2015-06-01 15:03 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>:> On 01/06/15 13:47, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> Sorry I don't understand you answer. For me 32 bits platforms are dead on >> server side. So nobody would set up a new AD using Samba 4 above a 32 bits >> system. >> >> 2015-06-01 14:34 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>: >> >> Am 01.06.2015 um 14:09 schrieb mathias dufresne: >>> >>> Still playing with a big database (120k users, 150k computers) I tried >>>> to >>>> split my users into a lot of OUs. This increased the database size and I >>>> was not able to finish to add users into the DB because database file >>>> has >>>> reached 4GB size which seems to be the limit. >>>> >>>> First: am I right to say file >>>> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=example,DC=com.ldb has a maximum >>>> size >>>> of 4GB? >>>> >>>> Secondly: if I'm right about the size limit, why this size limit? >>>> >>>> because nobody expects such setups on 32bit? >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>> >>> > Hi, I think there is some misunderstanding here, probably because your > subject was: '32 bits limit?' > I think what you mean is, 'even though I am using a 64bit system, I can > only have a 4GB ldb file.', this is a valid question that I think will > have to answered by one of the devs. > > Rowland > > Rowland > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >
Hi, Is there any possibility that you're using a filesystem which such limitations? Regards Le 01/06/2015 15:11, mathias dufresne a ?crit :> Hi, > > You're quiet right, I'm using a 64 bits system and I was surprised by this > file size limitation on such a system. My bad regarding the title : ) > > Cheers, > > mathias > > 2015-06-01 15:03 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > >> On 01/06/15 13:47, mathias dufresne wrote: >> >>> Sorry I don't understand you answer. For me 32 bits platforms are dead on >>> server side. So nobody would set up a new AD using Samba 4 above a 32 bits >>> system. >>> >>> 2015-06-01 14:34 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>: >>> >>> Am 01.06.2015 um 14:09 schrieb mathias dufresne: >>>> Still playing with a big database (120k users, 150k computers) I tried >>>>> to >>>>> split my users into a lot of OUs. This increased the database size and I >>>>> was not able to finish to add users into the DB because database file >>>>> has >>>>> reached 4GB size which seems to be the limit. >>>>> >>>>> First: am I right to say file >>>>> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=example,DC=com.ldb has a maximum >>>>> size >>>>> of 4GB? >>>>> >>>>> Secondly: if I'm right about the size limit, why this size limit? >>>>> >>>>> because nobody expects such setups on 32bit? >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>>> >>>> >> Hi, I think there is some misunderstanding here, probably because your >> subject was: '32 bits limit?' >> I think what you mean is, 'even though I am using a 64bit system, I can >> only have a 4GB ldb file.', this is a valid question that I think will >> have to answered by one of the devs. >> >> Rowland >> >> Rowland >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>
Once more, my bad : ) I'm using Ext4 file system, so no limitation from there (or missed something) 2015-06-01 15:12 GMT+02:00 S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org>:> Hi, > > Is there any possibility that you're using a filesystem which such > limitations? > > Regards > > > Le 01/06/2015 15:11, mathias dufresne a ?crit : > >> Hi, >> >> You're quiet right, I'm using a 64 bits system and I was surprised by this >> file size limitation on such a system. My bad regarding the title : ) >> >> Cheers, >> >> mathias >> >> 2015-06-01 15:03 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >> >> On 01/06/15 13:47, mathias dufresne wrote: >>> >>> Sorry I don't understand you answer. For me 32 bits platforms are dead >>>> on >>>> server side. So nobody would set up a new AD using Samba 4 above a 32 >>>> bits >>>> system. >>>> >>>> 2015-06-01 14:34 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>: >>>> >>>> Am 01.06.2015 um 14:09 schrieb mathias dufresne: >>>> >>>>> Still playing with a big database (120k users, 150k computers) I >>>>> tried >>>>> >>>>>> to >>>>>> split my users into a lot of OUs. This increased the database size >>>>>> and I >>>>>> was not able to finish to add users into the DB because database file >>>>>> has >>>>>> reached 4GB size which seems to be the limit. >>>>>> >>>>>> First: am I right to say file >>>>>> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=example,DC=com.ldb has a maximum >>>>>> size >>>>>> of 4GB? >>>>>> >>>>>> Secondly: if I'm right about the size limit, why this size limit? >>>>>> >>>>>> because nobody expects such setups on 32bit? >>>>>> >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >>>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, I think there is some misunderstanding here, probably because your >>> subject was: '32 bits limit?' >>> I think what you mean is, 'even though I am using a 64bit system, I can >>> only have a 4GB ldb file.', this is a valid question that I think will >>> have to answered by one of the devs. >>> >>> Rowland >>> >>> Rowland >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>> >>> >