search for: orniz

...te sync and etc which is making remote access much easier compare to samba... But these sync function don't support remote mount so what I'm thinking is to do a bidirection-sync the files over... Any suggestion? On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:06 AM, S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org > wrote: > Mount wontt be a solution since you'll force things to one uid/gid > > Why do you need bidir sync? > > > Le 14/06/2015 20:01, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : > >> Hi Sebastien, >> >> Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? >>...

Hi Sebastien, Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? Thank you. S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org> ? 2015?6?15? ?????? > Hi > > rsync -a should be able to perform chown using usernames rather than uids > so your files would still be owned by the right user. > > Regards > > Le 14/06/2015 16:48, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : > >> Dear All, >> >> Sorry...

Zitat von Sébastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org>: >> The very strange thing is, that gpupdate tries to copy somethings >> from \\cch.intra\sysvol and not from \\dc1\sysvol... >> There a no server with name cch.intra, this is just the Realm... > > Thats expected. your.realm should resolve to all your DC in a &g...

...... > > > > But these sync function don't support remote mount so what I'm thinking > is > > to do a bidirection-sync the files over... > > > > Any suggestion? > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:06 AM, S?bastien Le Ray < > sebastien-samba at orniz.org > > > >> wrote: > > Mount wontt be a solution since you'll force things to one uid/gid Why > do you need bidir sync? Le 14/06/2015 20:01, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : Hi > Sebastien, Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? Thank you. > S?bastien Le Ray...

Hi, I was wondering if there was a possibility for remote sites to avoid having a "local" domain controller (Samba 4 AD DC) and still provide share access while WAN link is down. Something like the Windows credential cache on workstation. Regards

Le 18/03/2016 20:58, lingpanda101 at gmail.com a écrit : > On 3/18/2016 2:15 PM, Sébastien Le Ray wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Are you using Item level targeting in your GPO? >>> >> >> No > > When this error happens, can you confirm if you can manually navigate > to the file? Open file explorer and enter the UNC path. > > ie.

...r domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). To diagnose the failure, review the event log or run GPRESULT /H GPReport.html from the command line to access information about Group Policy results. On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Sébastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org > wrote: > Hi, > > Do you have any specific error message in Windows events log concerning > GPO? > > Regards > > > Le 24/07/2016 à 05:40, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > >> Dear All, >> I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found...

...te access much easier compare to > samba... > > But these sync function don't support remote mount so what I'm thinking is > to do a bidirection-sync the files over... > > Any suggestion? > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:06 AM, S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org > >> wrote: > Mount wontt be a solution since you'll force things to one uid/gid Why do you need bidir sync? Le 14/06/2015 20:01, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : Hi Sebastien, Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? Thank you. S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz....

Zitat von Sébastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org>: > Did you try a samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset on the DC? (actually… > that almost never fixed anything in my case but why not) I just tried to run "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" on the DC and I got many "Failed nsupdate: 2" and at the end "Faile...

...*ProcessingTimeInMilliseconds*">3541</Data> <Data Name="*ErrorCode*">5</Data> <Data Name="*ErrorDescription*">存取被拒。</Data> </EventData> </Event> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Sébastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org > wrote: > Hi, > > That's look more like a gpupdate output than an event log entry :-) > > > > Le 24/07/2016 à 20:46, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > >> Hello Sébastien Le Ray, >> >> The PC reply the following... >> >> The processing of Gro...

Hi list, I've a strange issue with Windows 7 (also occurs on 8.1) when accessing shares on domain controllers. If I use IP address or in-domain FQDN (server.domain.name), all is right. If I use another DNS entry pointing to the same IP, share access fails with following message (translated from french) : \\somehost.somsuffix\someshare is not accessible. […] Invalid parameter Issue

...samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] [Bug or Limitation] Folder sharing >inside another share > >Ok I understand: Samba respect UNIX permission so this is >normal behaviour >Thanks for all > >-----Message d'origine----- >De?: S?bastien Le Ray [mailto:sebastien-samba at orniz.org] >Envoy??: vendredi 5 juin 2015 15:11 >??: MORILLO Jordi; samba at lists.samba.org >Objet?: Re: [Samba] [Bug or Limitation] Folder sharing inside >another share > >Hi, > >I guess it is ? by design ?. smb process for a.stark gets >a.stark UID and is thus subject to...

Once more, my bad : ) I'm using Ext4 file system, so no limitation from there (or missed something) 2015-06-01 15:12 GMT+02:00 S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org>: > Hi, > > Is there any possibility that you're using a filesystem which such > limitations? > > Regards > > > Le 01/06/2015 15:11, mathias dufresne a ?crit : > >> Hi, >> >> You're quiet right, I'm using a 64 bits system and I was...

...t; > If the upd packages are to big, tcp is tried. > > > > > > And let us know the result. > > > > Greetz, > > > > Louis > > > > > > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > >> Van: Sébastien Le Ray [mailto:sebastien at orniz.org] > >> Verzonden: dinsdag 29 maart 2016 16:10 > >> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle; samba at lists.samba.org > >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Permission denied on GPT.ini (Event ID 1058) > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> French windows version > >> &...

...en: maandag 21 maart 2016 10:45 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Permission denied on GPT.ini (Event ID 1058) > > > > Le 20/03/2016 17:03, Klaus Hartnegg a écrit : > >> Am 19.03.2016 um 08:16 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray <sebastien- > samba at orniz.org>: > >> > >> Yes but in that case I'm not using the machine account anymore but the > currently logged in user account. That's why I guess it is related to some > machine account configuration issue but I can find no way to test machine > account access? &gt...

...1 | 10243 Berlin > > Tel. +49 30 44310-555 | Fax +49 30 44310-182 > zerwes at rosalux.de | www.rosalux.de > > ________________________________________ > Von: samba [samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]&quot; im Auftrag von &quot;Sébastien Le Ray [sebastien-samba at orniz.org] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. Juli 2015 18:41 > An: Samba Mailing List > Betreff: [Samba] Strange issue with share access on domain controllers > > Hi list, > > I've a strange issue with Windows 7 (also occurs on 8.1) when accessing > shares on domain controllers. If I u...

Hi, Given i have this share : [j.snow] Path = /home/j.snow Share and ntfs permission : j.snow user Now I add another folder share inside the first one : [a.stark] Path = /home/j.snow/a.stark Share and ntfs permission : a.stark user /home/j.snow/a.stark has now parent inherit permission (j.snow) AND a.stark user a.stark can't access to her share ! if I add a.stark NTFS access to [j.snow]

...have seen these things also with pc's which are wrongly syspreped. Which cases same SID's for the pc's. But please try also if you point the problem pc to the DCs as dns, please do try it. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sébastien Le Ray [mailto:sebastien-samba at orniz.org] > Verzonden: dinsdag 29 maart 2016 16:58 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Permission denied on GPT.ini (Event ID 1058) > > Company's dns which recurse on AD DC for my.ad.domain subdomain > > Regards > > Le 29/03/2016 1...

...DC I would have on sysvol synchronisation > between > >> DC, ACL on all sysvol, DNS entries (but I don't think that's a DNS > issue if > >> you have only GPO issue). > >> > >> 2016-03-29 14:51 GMT+02:00 Sébastien Le Ray <sebastien- > samba at orniz.org>: > >> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> Same here, GPO work without UID/GID on machine account (since issue > >>> "resolves" itself sometime) > >>> > >>> It really seems to depend on which DC is chosen at start. &...

...<your_dc> is the DC used to connect on. If issue comes from one DC I would have on sysvol synchronisation between DC, ACL on all sysvol, DNS entries (but I don't think that's a DNS issue if you have only GPO issue). 2016-03-29 14:51 GMT+02:00 Sébastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org>: > Hi > > Same here, GPO work without UID/GID on machine account (since issue > "resolves" itself sometime) > > It really seems to depend on which DC is chosen at start. > > One of the affected machine just recovered without any change except a > reboot...