hai,
i need following topics for your help give the full articals.pls
send .
thanks
prabhukumar
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 12:03 +0000, samba-request@lists.samba.org
wrote:> Send samba mailing list submissions to
> samba@lists.samba.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> samba-request@lists.samba.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> samba-owner@lists.samba.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of samba digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. How to handle domain logout? (DRVTiny)
> 2. vfs object recycle: could two shares use the same repository?
> (M. Mueller)
> 3. [Fwd: Re: [Samba] How to tell Samba not to use the passwd
> file] (Michael Gasch)
> 4. inverse veto files (Michael Gasch)
> 5. slow wan to wan samba connection (scott)
> 6. Re: How to handle domain logout? (Ulf Nor?n)
> 7. Re: WINS over subnets (Hoggins!)
> 8. Re: Re: WINS over subnets (Edmundo Valle Neto)
> 9. Samba AD support with openldap and SASL (ShunLei_Pak@emc.com)
> 10. How to copy a file from linux to window pc (Indunil Jayasooriya)
> 11. Re: How to copy a file from linux to window pc (odi)
> 12. Horrible write performance from XP to Samba (Peter Daum)
> 13. Re: WINS over subnets (Hoggins!)
> 14. fully qualified usernames ?? (Robert Gehr)
> 15. Auth Problem (Marian Neagul)
> 16. Re: How to copy a file from linux to window pc (Gerard Seibert)
> 17. RE: fully qualified usernames ?? (Peter Trifonov)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:22:43 +0400
> From: DRVTiny <mudraia@list.ru>
> Subject: [Samba] How to handle domain logout?
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <E1GU0LD-000Ics-00.mudraia-list-ru@mx2.mail.ru>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> I need to create a server-side (bash or perl script) handler for domain
user logoff event.
> Is it possible to do it theoretically and if it is possible, how can i
realize this in practice?
>
> My configuration: PDC running Samba 3.0.23b with 35 workstations under
Windows 2000 Pro connected to PDC
> Thanks!
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:28:27 +0200
> From: "M. Mueller" <malte.mueller@ewetel.net>
> Subject: [Samba] vfs object recycle: could two shares use the same
> repository?
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <452016DB.4080904@ewetel.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
> i use the vfs-object "recycle" on the [homes] share and defined
> recycle:repository = /backup/recycle/%G/%U/.recycle.
> What happens, when using the same repository path for another share,
> e.g. [data]. Could this lead to data loss in the waste bin?
> I could of course branch into
"/backup/recycle/%G/%U/.recycle/homes" and
> "/backup/recycle/%G/%U/.recycle/data" but i would like to avoid
that.
>
> Thanks for any comments,
> Malte Mller
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:46:10 +0200
> From: Michael Gasch <gasch@eva.mpg.de>
> Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Samba] How to tell Samba not to use the passwd
> file]
> To: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry@samba.org>
> Cc: samba <samba@lists.samba.org>, dtovey@emergecore.com
> Message-ID: <451CDD52.2050204@eva.mpg.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> hi jerry,
>
> >> I tested it. I tried several permutations, using "invalid
> >> > users" and "valid users" in both the [global]
and
> >> > [homes] sections. With the "invalid users" line
> >> > that you had (in either section), once I login as a
> >> > Domain Admin I can then get at all these system
> >> > account directories.
> >
> > Hmmm...ok. Must have gotten broken then. Thanks for
> > letting me know.
> >
>
> i did not verified the current state but did you make any progress in
> this? just asking :) ...
>
> greez
> --
> Michael Gasch
> Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
> Department of Human Evolution (IT Staff)
> Deutscher Platz 6
> D-04103 Leipzig
> Germany
>
> Phone: 49 (0)341 - 3550 137
> 49 (0)341 - 3550 374
>
> Fax: 49 (0)341 - 3550 399
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:25:31 +0200
> From: Michael Gasch <gasch@eva.mpg.de>
> Subject: [Samba] inverse veto files
> To: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
> Cc: samba <samba@lists.samba.org>
> Message-ID: <451CE68B.7020108@eva.mpg.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> hi jeremy,
>
> you asked the people requesting an inverse option of "veto files"
to
> remind you to put this on 3.0.24.
>
> just to summarize what we want:
> - have an option to set files incl. wildcards that are allowed for a
> share (inverse of veto parameter), e.g.
> allow files = /*.odt/ # allows only odt-files to be stored on a share
>
> regex would be nice to have but i'm aware of the complexity and
possible
> performance issues.
>
> thx!
> micha
>
>
> --
> Michael Gasch
> Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
> Department of Human Evolution (IT Staff)
> Deutscher Platz 6
> D-04103 Leipzig
> Germany
>
> Phone: 49 (0)341 - 3550 137
> 49 (0)341 - 3550 374
>
> Fax: 49 (0)341 - 3550 399
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:38:27 -0600
> From: scott <icedutah@comcast.net>
> Subject: [Samba] slow wan to wan samba connection
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <45202743.9030204@comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I have a samba file server running as the pdc for a network. There are 5
> different subnets that connect to it over ptp t1 links using cisco
> routers. It has ran just fine for years until now. Local traffic to the
> file server is flawless. Traffic over the other non-local links has come
> to a halt for some reason. You can browse down a few directories but
> after that it just kills windows explorer. All the pc's have the samba
> server as the WINS server also and DNS server. Any help why the
> non-local networks would act like this?
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:10:33 +0200
> From: Ulf Nor?n <Ulf.Noren@miun.se>
> Subject: Re: [Samba] How to handle domain logout?
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Cc: DRVTiny <mudraia@list.ru>
> Message-ID: <200610012210.34193.Ulf.Noren@miun.se>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Sunday 01 October 2006 14:22, DRVTiny wrote:
> > I need to create a server-side (bash or perl script) handler for
domain
> > user logoff event. Is it possible to do it theoretically and if it is
> > possible, how can i realize this in practice?
> >
> > My configuration: PDC running Samba 3.0.23b with 35 workstations under
> > Windows 2000 Pro connected to PDC Thanks!
>
> A "clean" logoff can be handled through a logout script on the
client. That
> script could connect to a special share on the server that has a configured
> preexec-script.
>
> I use this teqnique for logging purposes.
>
> /ULf
>
> --
> Ulf Norn
> IT-avd, Mittuniversitetet
> 0660-57899,070-5142781
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:45:52 +0200
> From: "Hoggins!" <hoggins@wheres5.com>
> Subject: [Samba] Re: WINS over subnets
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <efpjue$j5g$1@sea.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Edmundo Valle Neto a crit :
> > Hoggins! escreveu:
> >
> > Yes, in that case it should maintain a more complete list. And yes you
> > just must have ONE WINS server.
> > I think you didnt got the point, domain master, local master, domain
> > controllers, wins server, etc are just roles of the same server,
> > enabling some options in smb.conf the same server can be all of them
at
> > the same time.
> > BUT, other subnets need local master browsers too, they can be any
> > Windows workstation (normally you should not worry about that), this
is
> > one of the reasons that all of them must use the same single WINS
server
> > (I am not saying that yours are not), the LMB can be any available
> > workstation (the machines in the subnet should elect one
automatically),
> > so any machine ending up beeing a LMB will use the same WINS server
to
> > find the DMB and sync. It works that way without you needing to care
> > about it.
> >
> >
> > Ok, if the wireless clients can see each others probably that segment
> > has an LMB with the browse list of that segment but just isnt passing
it
> > to the samba server.
> > About the LMBs I just said that to make it clear, that the other
> > networks dont register themselves directly with samba to be included
in
> > the browse.dat file, who does that is the LMB of that segment (as
> > explained before).
>
> Thanks, I understand better now how it works.
> So the LMB (any Win machine, elected) of the 192.168.3.0/24 segment must
> send its browse list to the server, right ? I must check this traffic
> with ethereal and/or with debug level 2. Sorry I didn't yet.
>
> > Yes, it is possible and most of the times the recommended way.
> >
> >
> > Theres some tools and comands to see problems with name resolution on
> > the XP clients, like nbtstat or the netbios browsing console.
> >
> > Putting a log level of 2 in smb.conf, is there any interesting
> > information about elections in the nmbd log? Whould help if you
include
> > your smb.conf here too.
>
> Yes, I put debug level to 2, and I saw that the server was always
> elected as the master. And also that the machines successfully
> registered to the server.
> My smb.conf (a bit modified since my first post, but the symptoms are
> the same though) :
>
> [global]
> display charset = ASCII
> workgroup = BOUFFARD
> netbios aliases = hgsserver
> server string = PARTAGES
> interfaces = eth0
> security = SHARE
> map to guest = Bad User
> root directory = /
> pam password change = Yes
> passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
> passwd chat debug = Yes
> username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
> unix password sync = Yes
> # log level = 2
> # syslog = 3
> # syslog only = Yes
> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> max log size = 50
> debug timestamp = No
> time server = Yes
> server signing = auto
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192
> printcap name = /etc/printcap
> os level = 32
> lm announce = Yes
> preferred master = Yes
> domain master = Yes
> local master = no
> dns proxy = No
> wins support = Yes
> ldap ssl = no
> remote announce = 192.168.3.255/BOUFFARD
> remote browse sync = 192.168.3.255 224.0.0.1
> usershare path > winbind enum users = Yes
> winbind enum groups = Yes
> winbind use default domain = Yes
> guest ok = Yes
> hosts allow = 192.168.2.0/24, 192.168.3.0/24
> cups options = raw
>
> [...] (some shares declarations)
>
> I'll come with more results on benchmarks ASAP. Thanks for your help
and
> patience.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hoggins!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 23:38:55 -0300
> From: Edmundo Valle Neto <edmundo.valle@terra.com.br>
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: WINS over subnets
> To: "Hoggins!" <hoggins@wheres5.com>
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <45207BBF.4050901@terra.com.br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> ...
> > Yes, I put debug level to 2, and I saw that the server was always
> > elected as the master. And also that the machines successfully
> > registered to the server.
> > My smb.conf (a bit modified since my first post, but the symptoms are
> > the same though) :
> >
> > [global]
> > display charset = ASCII
> > workgroup = BOUFFARD
> > netbios aliases = hgsserver
> > server string = PARTAGES
> > interfaces = eth0
> > security = SHARE
> > map to guest = Bad User
> > root directory = /
> > pam password change = Yes
> > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
> > passwd chat debug = Yes
> > username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
> > unix password sync = Yes
> > # log level = 2
> > # syslog = 3
> > # syslog only = Yes
> > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> > max log size = 50
> > debug timestamp = No
> > time server = Yes
> > server signing = auto
> > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192
> > printcap name = /etc/printcap
> > os level = 32
> > lm announce = Yes
> > preferred master = Yes
> > domain master = Yes
> > local master = no
> > dns proxy = No
> > wins support = Yes
> > ldap ssl = no
> > remote announce = 192.168.3.255/BOUFFARD
> > remote browse sync = 192.168.3.255 224.0.0.1
> > usershare path > > winbind enum users = Yes
> > winbind enum groups = Yes
> > winbind use default domain = Yes
> > guest ok = Yes
> > hosts allow = 192.168.2.0/24, 192.168.3.0/24
> > cups options = raw
> >
> > [...] (some shares declarations)
> >
> > I'll come with more results on benchmarks ASAP. Thanks for your
help
> > and patience.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hoggins!
> >
>
> Theres some options that I think are not needed in your config, but
> probably doesnt cause that problem that you have, in exeption of this one:
>
> local master = no
>
> Try to set it to yes, I never tried to set it to no and let it be only
> the DMB to see what happens but the samba docs have something to say
> about that, "If you want Samba to be a DMB, then it is recommended
that
> you also set preferred master to yes, because Samba will not become a
> DMB for the whole of your LAN or WAN IF IT IS NOT ALSO A LMB ON ITS OWN
> BROADCAST ISOLATED SUBNET". Anyway its at least recommended to samba
be
> the LMB too.
>
> Regards.
>
> Edmundo Valle Neto
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:58:07 -0400
> From: ShunLei_Pak@emc.com
> Subject: [Samba] Samba AD support with openldap and SASL
> To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
> Message-ID:
> <8445C3A587DB7246B316AB952E5BBE5F041D51BD@CORPUSMX50B.corp.emc.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build Samba 3.0.23c for 2003 AD membership support. My
> understanding is that AD membership support requires openldap's client
> libraries only. Do I need to have SASL, REGEX and Berkeley DB installed
> first before I build the client libraries? I think I can skip Berkeley
> DB but not sure about SASL and REGEX.
>
> Since my target device has very limited memory and disk space, I'm
> trying to get rid of unnecessary components. For openldap, are the
> "liblber" and "libldap_r" libraries sufficient for AD
support?
>
> I've been struggling with openldap. I'd appreciate if someone
could
> post the "configure" options/switches for building openldap.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Pak Lei
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:26:30 +0530
> From: "Indunil Jayasooriya" <indunil75@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Samba] How to copy a file from linux to window pc
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID:
> <7ed6b0aa0610012356o2bd5b159l16af150163567de6@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> I have file at /opt/mailbackup/mailbackup.tar.gz (this is a Linux Machine)
>
> I want to put this file to a windows pc.
>
> What is the command to do it.
>
> can I use something like the following.
>
> mount -t smbfs
>
> Then How to use this ?
>
> --
> Thank you
> Indunil Jayasooriya
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:04:26 +0200
> From: odi <odix@odiisi.net>
> Subject: Re: [Samba] How to copy a file from linux to window pc
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <200610020904.26375.odix@odiisi.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> The simliest way is to do this with smbclient, which is like a simple ftp
> client, type smbclient --help for command line options.
>
> regards odi
> Am Montag, 2. Oktober 2006 08:56 schrieb Indunil Jayasooriya:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have file at /opt/mailbackup/mailbackup.tar.gz (this is a Linux
Machine)
> >
> > I want to put this file to a windows pc.
> >
> > What is the command to do it.
> >
> > can I use something like the following.
> >
> > mount -t smbfs
> >
> > Then How to use this ?
> >
> > --
> > Thank you
> > Indunil Jayasooriya
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:30:43 +0200
> From: Peter Daum <gator_ml@yahoo.de>
> Subject: [Samba] Horrible write performance from XP to Samba
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <efqf74$g7b$1@sea.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I noted an extremely poor performance when copying big files from
> a windows xp client to a samba share. The exact version of samba
> does not seem to matter: I tried several different samba servers
> with versions between 3.014 and 3.0.23b running on Linux 2.4.32
> and 2.6.17 (machines and network otherwise idle, clients connected
> via fast ethernet, servers via Gbit; network performance in both
> directions around 95 Mbit/s). I made several tests copying a 1GB
> file with Windows 98 and Windows XP clients. Reading the file from
> the server takes predictably around 105 seconds (~9.75 MB/s).
>
> Writing to the server takes only slightly longer on Win98 (130
> seconds, ~8 MB/s) while the same takes approximately 45 minutes
> from a XP client (I don't know whether this matters, I noted that
> on the XP write test, the directory listing on the server
> immediately shows a file with the final size - obviously a sparse
> file, repeatedly invoking du shows the gradually increasing actual
> size).
>
> I wrote a little test program that just writes data to a file and
> shows the throughput; the transfer rates I get that way are pretty
> reasonable, so it is not a general problem but something that only
> occurs on specific operations like copying.
>
> Tracing the network traffic also didn't tell me what the problem
> might be: XP uses for copying as well as for other write
> operations WriteAndXRequest, the only peculiarity I noticed is the
> slightly exotic block size of 61440 bytes per request when copying
> (which also doesn't seem to be the problem - Win98 uses the same
> block size with WriteRaw)
>
> Has anybody else made similar experiences? (Since I could see this
> issue with differently configured servers/clients, it should not
> be just my personal problem. Of course in most settings where the
> data usually goes mostly from the server to the client it is not
> obvious)
>
> Any ideas what's going on and what to do about it?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:43:12 +0200
> From: "Hoggins!" <hoggins@wheres5.com>
> Subject: [Samba] Re: WINS over subnets
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <efqmvb$6vf$1@sea.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Edmundo Valle Neto a crit :
> > ...
> >
> > Theres some options that I think are not needed in your config, but
> > probably doesnt cause that problem that you have, in exeption of this
one:
> >
> > local master = no
> >
> > Try to set it to yes, I never tried to set it to no and let it be only
> > the DMB to see what happens but the samba docs have something to say
> > about that, "If you want Samba to be a DMB, then it is
recommended that
> > you also set preferred master to yes, because Samba will not become a
> > DMB for the whole of your LAN or WAN IF IT IS NOT ALSO A LMB ON ITS
OWN
> > BROADCAST ISOLATED SUBNET". Anyway its at least recommended to
samba be
> > the LMB too.
>
> Well, this option was previously set to yes, and it did not work either.
> Changing this, I thought it would make difficult the election of a LMB
> on other nets, but you say it won't, so I put it back, and maybe the
> other things I changed will cause it to work at last !
>
> Do you have any other ideas about this config ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hoggins!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:53:13 +0200
> From: Robert Gehr <robert.gehr@baumann-gmbh.de>
> Subject: [Samba] fully qualified usernames ??
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <4520E189.8000009@baumann-gmbh.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
>
> Hi there
>
> Just a couple of questions to help me understand.
>
> When I upgrade from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23c the access restrictions on my
> shares on the member server no longer work. I read in the Changes file
>
> "Since Samba 3.0.8, it has been recommended that all domain accounts
> listed in smb.conf on a member server be fully qualified with the...."
>
> So far so good I know what I have to do still I don't quite understand
> why the member server is no longer able to identify the user connecting.
>
> When, on the member server, I do a "wbinfo -U ID" I get the
correct SID
> When I do "wbinfo -a joe%passwd" it succeeds as well as a
> "wbinfo -a DOMAIN\\joe%passwd"
>
> So winbindd identifies joe all right even without the DOMAIN prefix. Why
> does this no longer work for shares on the member server that have
>
> valid users = joe
>
> defined??
>
> The member server gets its local users and groups via ldap.
>
> I also have in my smb.conf:
> winbind trusted domains only = Yes
>
>
> What am I missing??
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Robert Gehr
>
>
> "Technological progress has merely provided us
> with more efficient means for going backwards"
>
> ~ Aldous Huxley
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:57:16 +0300
> From: "Marian Neagul" <marian@info.uvt.ro>
> Subject: [Samba] Auth Problem
> To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
> Message-ID: <000301c6e609$2444a350$a50a0a0a@wmat>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have a problem related to user authentication: Users can not login from
> Windows workstations.
>
> I get the following error:
>
> "The system could not log you in. Make sure your User Name and domain
are
> correct then type your password again."
>
>
>
> Users can access shares, they are prompted for a user and password and it
is
> ok. The same user and password does not work for login.
>
> What could be the problem? I've posted the logs and smb.conf at
> http://www.info.uvt.ro/~neagul/samba/
>
> I want to mention that the server is a production server and was hit by a
> hardware failure. :-( I restored everything but it doesn't work.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> Marian Neagul
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 06:56:36 -0400
> From: Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net>
> Subject: [Samba] Re: How to copy a file from linux to window pc
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Message-ID: <20061002064738.5D4A.GERARD@seibercom.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> "Indunil Jayasooriya" <indunil75@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have file at /opt/mailbackup/mailbackup.tar.gz (this is a Linux
Machine)
> >
> > I want to put this file to a windows pc.
> >
> > What is the command to do it.
> >
> > can I use something like the following.
> >
> > mount -t smbfs
> >
> > Then How to use this ?
>
> I use this method on my FreeBSD 6.1 system.
>
>
> 1) Create a directory: '/c'
>
> 2) Create an alias:
>
> alias c:='mount /c'
>
> 3) Place this in my /etc/fstab file:
>
> //user-name@bios-name/directory /c smbfs rw,noauto 0 0
>
> Obviously you will need to make sure that the drive or directory you
> want to access are configured correctly on the Windows machine.
>
> Now all I have to do is type: c: at the command line and the Win share
> is mounted. I can then do a simple cp <file> <Win-file>.
>
> Ciao!
>
