search for: dmb

There is Windows 2008R2 actng as DC and Samba4 4.5.2 acting as standalone server in the same network. Samba4 is set up to be DMB: domain master = yes local maser= yes browse list = yes os level = 254 preferred master = yes enhanced browsing = yes Windows 2008R2 includes also DMB role in itself. As following, if Windows boots first, before Samba starts, it becomes DMB and has workgroup<1b> resource name, if Samba star...

Hi, I got an optimization problem (O1, O2) regarding memory barrier “dmb ishld” I find in the test/CodeGen/AArch64/intrinsics-memory-barrier.ll , it’s stated that memory access around DMB should not be reordered, but when compiling the Linux kernel, I found load/store in static inline void hlist_add_before_rcu(struct hlist_node *n, struct hlist_nod...

...g happened.. and I wonder why it didn''t complain? I am sure I am just misunderstanding some doc which tells me why this happened? argus:~# shorewall check Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Verifying Configuration... Loading Modules... Determining Zones... Zones: net loc dmz dmb Validating interfaces file... Validating hosts file... Determining Hosts in Zones... Net Zone: eth0:0.0.0.0/0 Local Zone: eth1:0.0.0.0/0 DMZ Zone: eth2:0.0.0.0/0 DMB Zone: eth3:0.0.0.0/0 Validating rules file... Rule "DNAT loc dmz:213.212.33.20 tcp smtp - 192.168.221.7&...

Have there been any problems reported with running 2.0.2 on servers using security=server with a 1.9.18p10 DMB? We've run into a situation where I've upgraded 4 of our servers to 2.0.2 but the DMB is still running 1.9.18p10. We have had sporatic trouble with the upgraded servers rejecting correct passwords because the DMB seemingly would not properly validate them. Today, we ran into a more serious...

Note: LMB = Local Master Browser DMB = Domain Master Browser Have Samba 2.2.7A running embedded in a variant of ucLinux. My interest was only to use Samba as a WINS server. I've set up the SMB.CONF with this config. for one test: wins support = yes local master = no domain master = yes preferred master = no os level = 0 I'...

Hi Tim, > That barrier should be treated the same as any other dmb by LLVM. What > I'm most confused about is why it's there in the first place. From > what I can tell, the rcu_assign_pointer function should map to a > native store-release operation (stlr). I guess it's because we disabled the integrated-asm, so it won't complain when com...

Hello ! I have a problem of syncing browse lists between DMB and LMB. The topology of ours network is as follows: Linux Network comma(Linux, DMB, WINS) vol(Linux) door(Linux, LMB) | | | | | | | | | --------------(195.226.226.16/28)------ | | | |...

I'm using r223407. Switching to a clean built on r223853, it still gives me: ldr x8, [x21,#8] stp x21, x8, [x19] dmb ishst ldr x8, [x19,#8] str x19, [x8] str x19, [x21,#8] Thanks, Chengyu > On Dec 9, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9 December 2014 at 15:14, Chengyu Song <csong84 at gatech.edu> wrote: >> Errr. my fault. I patched...

...| | server) | | samba | | samba LNB---->linux samba | linux WINS linux mswin client<-----LNB I wanted to know which boxes were the LMBs and the DMB, so I looked into the wins.dat on the WINS server. But in wins.dat, I only see one line that has MSBROWSE in it: "^A^B__MSBROWSE__^B#01" 1066639333 255.255.255.255 e4R Is this supposed to be the DMB? Why the 255.255.255.255 address? I would expect there to be a host address ther...

If I have a client that wants to enumerate and access shares on a subnet, and that client knows the IP of the WINS server, is there any need for the client to use the "browsing" services of a DMB or LMB? What is the order of operations of the client? Here is what I imagine to be the case: 1. client asks LMB for a list of all available shares 2. LMB sends client the list of all known shares 3. for each name in the list of known shares, client asks WINS server for the server's I...

...nswer. (I'm reading Ch 10 of the how-to) On the one hand it says, "where there is no WINS server, all name registrations + name lookups are done by UPD broadcast." So then I don't need a WINS server. But then it says, "Clients wishing to browse the network make use of this [DMB] list but also depend on the availability of correct name resolution..." So then I need a working DNS setup and a WINS server (if I use a DMB) and only in the case of a DMB? Can someone clarify this for me? Here's my setup: * only one subnet * mixed environment (windows + linux) * all b...

...| | server) | | samba | | samba LNB---->linux samba | linux WINS linux mswin client<-----LNB I wanted to know which boxes were the LMBs and the DMB, so I looked into the wins.dat on the WINS server. But in wins.dat, I only see one line that has MSBROWSE in it: "^A^B__MSBROWSE__^B#01" 1066639333 255.255.255.255 e4R Is this supposed to be the DMB? Why the 255.255.255.255 address? I would expect there to be a host address ther...

...--------------------------- > Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 06:53:44 -0700 > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] __sync_add_and_fetch in objc block for global variable on ARM > From: t.p.northover at gmail.com > To: alexey.perevalov at hotmail.com > CC: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >> in disas I see dmb ish instruction, but I don't know is it enough. > > There should be 2 dmb instructions: one before the ldrex/strex loop > and one after. But I wouldn't expect dropping one to actually cause a > problem in the code you posted. Yes, there are two dmb's => 0x00008ed8 <+22...

I figure out that samba PDC did not advertised itself as <domain>#1b (DMB), is this normal? smb.conf : os level = 65 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes domain logons = yes [root@jeruk root]# nmblookup -A 10.200.100.3 Looking up status of 10.200.100.3 LIN3PWK <00> - H <ACTIVE> LIN3PWK...

I'm not sure, I was never able to compile the whole kernel with -O0, too many errors. Plus, the problem seems to be within machine code generation. I tried opt -O1 and -O2, the generated .ll file does not diff much for the target function (insert_leaf_info). Thanks, Chengyu > On Dec 9, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9 December 2014

...ain(); } in case of count is local variable in scope of main function and has __block attribute, all is fine. I'm using clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) Target: armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi Thread model: posix libBlockRuntime 0.3 libdispatch for linux 1.2 CPU is ARMv7, in disas I see dmb ish instruction, but I don't know is it enough. I understand, my clang is out of date. Moving to new version could be painful ) Maybe somebody knows, was that bug fixed? BR, Alexey

...:45 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I guess it's because we disabled the integrated-asm, so it won't complain when compiling the kernel. > > No, it's something different. The inline assembly (for whatever > reason) says to use a "dmb ishst" rather than an "stlr". I don't > actually think the reason is that important, it's just surprising > because I'd expect stlr to be more efficient. I see .... guess I'm using an old version of Linux kernel ... from the Android branch ... > Thanks for...

>> Switching to a clean built on r223853, it still gives me: >> >> ldr x8, [x21,#8] >> stp x21, x8, [x19] >> dmb ishst >> ldr x8, [x19,#8] >> str x19, [x8] >> str x19, [x21,#8] > > Isn't that correct though? The problematic "str" has been folded into > the "stp" instruction, so "x19 + 8" is written before it gets read. Indeed. I didn'...

I''ve encountered a rather unusual bug while I''m implementing live migration on arndale board. After resume, domU kernel starts invoking hypercalls and at some point the hypercall parameters delivered to xen are corrupted. After some debugging (with the help of HW debugger), I found that cache polution happens, and here is the detailed sequence. 1) DomU kernel allocates a local

On 7/16/14, 6:09 PM, sgundapa wrote: > I see a couple of issues here. > > If I include .S files for ARM, the –no-integrated-as path complains about > Assembler errors. > > The integrated-as path works fine though. > These are very likely just differences between the old ARM assembler syntax and the new 'Unified' syntax. Can you use an assembler that accepts UAL