Hello All, I have problem on workstations with PC-DOS 2000 with MS Network Client 3.0 connected to Samba 3.0.14a-0.4 (default on SLES 9) when I want to use ARJ.EXE (latest version 2.84) and unpack archive xxxx.arj. When this archive is on network drive shared by samba unpacking does infinite loop. For example arj l x:\xxx.arj produce never ending listing (and start of this listing is very slow). When this archive file is on network drive shared by windows (2k or XP) or NetServer (windows sharing on IBM iSeries - AS/400) all work fine. I don't know where start with this problem. Can somebody help me ? (Sorry for my "Czech english") Josef
Josef M?dl wrote:> I have problem on workstations with PC-DOS 2000 with MS Network Client 3.0 connected > to Samba 3.0.14a-0.4 (default on SLES 9) when I want to use ARJ.EXE (latest version 2.84) and unpack > archive xxxx.arj. When this archive is on network drive shared by samba unpacking does infinite loop.Seems to me there was such a bug back around 3.0.14. A few diff's in our environment... though we have PC DOS 2000 around, MS DOS 7 is our main DOS in use, to get native FAT32 support. As well, we use InfoZip for DOS, 32-bit edition. Does your server file system happen to be XFS? Anyway, grab 3.0.21c if you can for your distro, retest, and post results back to the list. -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ Remove the upper case letters NOSPAM to contact me directly.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:39:34PM +0100, Josef M?dl wrote:> Hello All, > > I have problem on workstations with PC-DOS 2000 with MS Network Client 3.0 connected > to Samba 3.0.14a-0.4 (default on SLES 9) when I want to use ARJ.EXE (latest version 2.84) and unpack > archive xxxx.arj. When this archive is on network drive shared by samba unpacking does infinite loop. > > For example arj l x:\xxx.arj produce never ending listing (and start of this listing is very slow). When this > archive file is on network drive shared by windows (2k or XP) or NetServer (windows sharing on IBM > iSeries - AS/400) all work fine. > > I don't know where start with this problem. Can somebody help me ?Known bug we fixed after 3.0.14a. Please upgrade. Jeremy.