Adrian Bunk
2005-Aug-21 21:32 UTC
[Samba] New maintainer needed for the Linux smb filesystem
Since Urban Widmark was not active for some time, and I didn't have any success trying to reach him, it seems we need a new maintainer for the smb filesystem in the Linux kernel. Is there anyone who both feels qualified and wants to become the new maintainer? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Andrew Morton
2005-Aug-21 21:32 UTC
[Samba] Re: New maintainer needed for the Linux smb filesystem
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:> > Since Urban Widmark was not active for some time, and I didn't have any > success trying to reach him, it seems we need a new maintainer for the > smb filesystem in the Linux kernel. > > Is there anyone who both feels qualified and wants to become the new > maintainer? >Yes, it's a poor situation. That driver seems to have quite a few problems. I was hoping that by now we could simply deprecate smbfs and tell people to use CIFS, but I'm not sure that CIFS is ready for that yet. Steve, what's your take? Does CIFS offer a 100% superset of smbfs capabilities? Thanks.
Reasonably Related Threads
- Is anyone maintaining the smb filesystem?
- [RFC: 2.6.16 patch] ocfs2 heartbeat: clean up bio submission code
- 2.6.4-mm1: modular quota needs unknown symbol
- What is the history of CONFIG_EXT{2,3}_CHECK?
- [PATCH 5/6] i386 virtualization - Make generic set wrprotect a macro