Sorry if this is a dup.  I sent right before I subscribed to the list,
so I'm not sure if it made it.
I have just taken over a redhat system with Samba 3.0.0 configured
with security = user, and domain logins enabled. I've included the
smb.conf at the end of this message.
I would like to upgrade to 3.0.10 for a numbers of reasons, one
being security and one being that password changes don't work
from workstation machines because of the Windows KB828741
patch.  What I want to know, is if I should expect any
incompatibilities between versions or if my existing config
files will work with the new version?  This is a mission
critical system, so I really don't want to upgrade unless
there are going to be very minimal issues.
Will a simple rpm -Uvh ./samba-3.0.10-1_rh9.i386.rpm put me
in the clear?
Thanks for your help.
Here is some information about the system:
----- OLD RPM PACKAGE -----
$ rpm -qi samba
Name        : samba                        Relocations: /usr
Version     : 3.0.0                             Vendor: (none)
Release     : 2                             Build Date: Thu 09 Oct 2003 
05:12:20 PM PDT
Install date: Sat 11 Oct 2003 10:41:04 PM PDT      Build Host: *removed*
Group       : Networking                    Source RPM: 
samba-3.0.0-2.src.rpm
Size        : 46416163                         License: GNU GPL version 2
Packager    : Gerald Carter [Samba-Team] <jerry@samba.org>
Summary     : Samba SMB client and server
----- NEW RPM PACKAGE -----
$ rpm -qpi ./samba-3.0.10-1_rh9.i386.rpm
Name        : samba                        Relocations: /usr
Version     : 3.0.10                            Vendor: Samba Team
Release     : 1                             Build Date: Wed 15 Dec 2004 
02:04:19 PM PST
Install date: (not installed)               Build Host: rh9
Group       : Networking                    Source RPM: 
samba-3.0.10-1.src.rpm
Size        : 45453218                         License: GNU GPL version 2
Packager    : Gerald Carter [Samba-Team] <jerry@samba.org>
Summary     : Samba SMB client and server
----- smb.conf file -----
[global]
         netbios name = *removed*
         workgroup = *removed*
         preferred master = yes
         domain master = yes
         wins support = yes
         os level = 85
         encrypt passwords = yes
         interfaces = eth0
         hosts allow = *removed*
         invalid users =  bin daemon adm sync shutdown
         logon path          logon drive = U:
         logon script = logon-%G.bat
         add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -s 
/bin/false -c 'Machine Account' -M %u
         admin users = @smbadmin
         printer admin = @smbadmin
         domain logons = Yes
         min protocol = NT1
[homes]
         comment = User Directory
         path = /usr/export/home/%U
         read only = NO
         browseable = NO
#       only user = %S
[netlogon]
         comment = Network Logon Service
         path = /etc/samba/netlogon
         guest ok = yes
         browseable = no
[print$]
         path = /var/samba/printers
         write list = @smbadmin
         guest ok = yes
[printers]
         comment = All Printers
         path = /tmp
         guest ok = Yes
         printable = yes
         printing = lprng
         browseable = No
-- 
Brent Smith <samba@nextreality.net>
Brent Smith wrote:> Sorry if this is a dup. I sent right before I subscribed to the list, > so I'm not sure if it made it. > > > I have just taken over a redhat system with Samba 3.0.0 configured > with security = user, and domain logins enabled. I've included the > smb.conf at the end of this message. > > I would like to upgrade to 3.0.10 for a numbers of reasons, one > being security and one being that password changes don't work > from workstation machines because of the Windows KB828741 > patch. What I want to know, is if I should expect any > incompatibilities between versions or if my existing config > files will work with the new version? This is a mission > critical system, so I really don't want to upgrade unless > there are going to be very minimal issues. > > Will a simple rpm -Uvh ./samba-3.0.10-1_rh9.i386.rpm put me > in the clear? > > Thanks for your help. > > Here is some information about the system: > > ----- OLD RPM PACKAGE ----- > $ rpm -qi samba > Name : samba Relocations: /usr > Version : 3.0.0 Vendor: (none) > Release : 2 Build Date: Thu 09 Oct > 2003 05:12:20 PM PDT > Install date: Sat 11 Oct 2003 10:41:04 PM PDT Build Host: *removed* > Group : Networking Source RPM: > samba-3.0.0-2.src.rpm > Size : 46416163 License: GNU GPL version 2 > Packager : Gerald Carter [Samba-Team] <jerry@samba.org> > Summary : Samba SMB client and server > > ----- NEW RPM PACKAGE ----- > $ rpm -qpi ./samba-3.0.10-1_rh9.i386.rpm > Name : samba Relocations: /usr > Version : 3.0.10 Vendor: Samba Team > Release : 1 Build Date: Wed 15 Dec > 2004 02:04:19 PM PST > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: rh9 > Group : Networking Source RPM: > samba-3.0.10-1.src.rpm > Size : 45453218 License: GNU GPL version 2 > Packager : Gerald Carter [Samba-Team] <jerry@samba.org> > Summary : Samba SMB client and server > > ----- smb.conf file ----- > [global] > netbios name = *removed* > workgroup = *removed* > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > wins support = yes > os level = 85 > encrypt passwords = yes > interfaces = eth0 > hosts allow = *removed* > invalid users = bin daemon adm sync shutdown > logon path > logon drive = U: > logon script = logon-%G.bat > add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -s > /bin/false -c 'Machine Account' -M %u > admin users = @smbadmin > printer admin = @smbadmin > domain logons = Yes > min protocol = NT1 > > [homes] > comment = User Directory > path = /usr/export/home/%U > read only = NO > browseable = NO > # only user = %S > > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /etc/samba/netlogon > guest ok = yes > browseable = no > > [print$] > path = /var/samba/printers > write list = @smbadmin > guest ok = yes > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /tmp > guest ok = Yes > printable = yes > printing = lprng > browseable = No >If you are going from a Red Hat supplied Samba release to one released by samba.org various things will be in different places. /etc/samba/ will remain the same however and your config files should translate over. Also keep in mind that Red Hat has split it's Samba package into three groups (samba, samba-client, samba-common). My advice is to remove all of your existing samba packages (backing up your config files of course) and then doing a clean install if this is the case. Christian