G'day.. just haveing the straingest problem.. I'd upgraded to the 302rc1 version. i configed it to be an pdc controller, with wins to manage our local domain.. only when browsing the domain list. it gives error(s) once in a while.. "An extended error has occured" & "the system cannot find massage text for message number 0x in the message file for \\hostname" this is when you try to acces a computer or share for a win2k box, it happens 10 out of 100 times.. on a linux box, log.smb reports: "lib/util_sock.c:matchname(941) sys_gethostname(host.domain): lookup failure lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_name(1008) matchname failed os host.domain 192.168.x.x" the pdc is the master browser with smb.conf os level = 66 preferred master = yes domain master = yes domain logons = yes local master = yes wins support = yes with 300 version i have no problems, from 301rc1 the error starts.. sugestions ?? solutions ..?? l8r Collen Blijenberg MLHJ
Collen wrote:> G'day.. just haveing the straingest problem.. > > I'd upgraded to the 302rc1 version. i configed it to be an pdc > controller, with wins to manage our local domain.. > only when browsing the domain list. > > it gives error(s) once in a while.. > "An extended error has occured" & > "the system cannot find massage text for message number 0x in the > message file for \\hostname" >I get this same error running 3.01 I have a PDC and multiple BDC's. The PDC has os level = 33 preferred master = yes domain master = yes domain logons = yes local master = yes wins support = yes My BDC's have os level = 32 preferred master = no domain master = no domain logons = yes local master = no wins server = <ip.address.of.bdc> This is a problem because I have shares on some Windows 2000 SP4 servers that my users cannot get to, I have to reboot the server for it to work. Is there someone who knows what is going on here or a suggestion to fix it?> this is when you try to acces a computer or share for a win2k box, it > happens 10 out of 100 times.. > > on a linux box, log.smb reports: > > "lib/util_sock.c:matchname(941) > sys_gethostname(host.domain): lookup failure > lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_name(1008) > matchname failed os host.domain 192.168.x.x" > > the pdc is the master browser with smb.conf > os level = 66 > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > domain logons = yes > local master = yes > wins support = yes > > with 300 version i have no problems, from 301rc1 the error starts.. > sugestions ?? solutions ..?? > > l8r > Collen Blijenberg > MLHJ > >
At 17:10 19/01/2004, you wrote:>Collen wrote: > >>G'day.. just haveing the straingest problem.. >> >>I'd upgraded to the 302rc1 version. i configed it to be an pdc >>controller, with wins to manage our local domain.. >>only when browsing the domain list. >> >>it gives error(s) once in a while.. >>"An extended error has occured" & >>"the system cannot find massage text for message number 0x in the message >>file for \\hostname" >I get this same error running 3.01 I have a PDC and multiple BDC's. The >PDC has >os level = 33 >preferred master = yes >domain master = yes >domain logons = yes >local master = yes >wins support = yes > >My BDC's have >os level = 32 >preferred master = no >domain master = no >domain logons = yes >local master = no >wins server = <ip.address.of.bdc> > >This is a problem because I have shares on some Windows 2000 SP4 servers >that my users cannot get to, I have to reboot the server for it to >work. Is there someone who knows what is going on here or a suggestion to >fix it? > >>this is when you try to acces a computer or share for a win2k box, it >>happens 10 out of 100 times.. >> >>on a linux box, log.smb reports: >> >>"lib/util_sock.c:matchname(941) >> sys_gethostname(host.domain): lookup failure >>lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_name(1008) >> matchname failed os host.domain 192.168.x.x" >> >>the pdc is the master browser with smb.conf >>os level = 66 >>preferred master = yes >>domain master = yes >>domain logons = yes >>local master = yes >>wins support = yes >> >>with 300 version i have no problems, from 301rc1 the error starts.. >>sugestions ?? solutions ..?? >> >>l8r >>Collen Blijenberg >>MLHJ >> >Hmm just downgrade to samba 300, that did the trick for me.. (to bad coz' i wanted to run the l8test smba) gues that some bug-fix didn't work out after 300 version. i saw multiple people having the same problem, so i gues they work on it. and fix it before the 302 release ?? till then, 300 works 99%. l8r Collen (MLHJ)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Collen wrote:> G'day.. just haveing the straingest problem.. > > I'd upgraded to the 302rc1 version. i configed it to be an pdc controller, > with wins to manage our local domain.. > only when browsing the domain list. > > it gives error(s) once in a while.. > "An extended error has occured" & > "the system cannot find massage text for message number 0x in the message > file for \\hostname"Doh! I thought I had this fixed in 3.0.2rc1. I need a level 10 debug log on this one. Can you send it to me? Thanks. cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song" --Switchfoot (2003) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFADfNRIR7qMdg1EfYRAt8lAJ9GBAx5/WrJMNY5JaSexy0IyyMOKACg5Dba KqfChHInglV6qw4iFF4g5fU=gopS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Collen wrote:> G'day.. just haveing the straingest problem.. > > I'd upgraded to the 302rc1 version. i configed it to be an pdc > controller, with wins to manage our local domain.. > only when browsing the domain list. > > it gives error(s) once in a while.. > "An extended error has occured" & > "the system cannot find massage text for message number 0x in the > message file for \\hostname"It's a schannel bug I'm pretty sure but I can't seem to track it down. We fixed once instance in 3.0.2rc1. Can you send me a level 10 debug log of a network trace of the failure (taken from the samba server)? From your config I assume you are not running winbindd. cheers, jerry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFADzYtIR7qMdg1EfYRAuwiAJ9r8BHqoUNWMNANp9gxTjF3kAifQACg3Stn utNSXufRN/vAsz8W9vuSLRw=e5O5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----