-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm the unhappy reporter of bug596, and I would like to report that bugs #596 and #532 are 100% the same, I've experimented today with tdbsam, and found conclusions about the number of users (under a limited number of users Win9x can get the list of users if there are more users than that don't, no mater that I've used ldapsam or tdbsam) similar to what's reported at bug #532. Unfortunately I wasn't able to report bug #596 as a duplicate of bug #532, so please in the future please consider writing about bug #532. Thanks, Geza Gemes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/mAnQ/PxuIn+i1pIRAizBAJ9Dt55kkzzrPTXCJOi1eKbeciaY9QCeOv2E HfN8oteOBcJqVBxYEyzUXsY=8RNC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 07:03:13PM +0200, G?mes G?za wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > I'm the unhappy reporter of bug596, and I would like to report that bugs > #596 and #532 are 100% the same, I've experimented today with tdbsam, > and found conclusions about the number of users (under a limited number > of users Win9x can get the list of users if there are more users than > that don't, no mater that I've used ldapsam or tdbsam) similar to what's > reported at bug #532. > Unfortunately I wasn't able to report bug #596 as a duplicate of bug > #532, so please in the future please consider writing about bug #532.If have fixed this bug in CVS. Please either update using the CVS code or apply the patch I posted to this list. Thanks, Jeremy.