Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bug596".
2003 Oct 21
3
Samba3+Win9x userlist, Bug596?!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: G?mes G?za [mailto:geza@kzsdabas.sulinet.hu]
>
> I've configured for testing pruposes an other PDC with tdbsam backend,
> and found, that with this backend win9x clients could get
> user and group
> list, while with ldapsam I had no success in it. Quite strange in my
> opinion:-(
Same problem here too. In 9x the userlist is
2003 Oct 23
1
Samba3+ldapsam+Win9x userlist, Bug596?! sniffing info
>Thereby sorry for being impolite :-(, but at present I'm running samba
>3.0.1pre1 with ldapsam in the production servers, >and Win9x clients
couldn't get list of users and groups from Samba DCs (Bug596). I have 3
>choices:
>- -- Switch back to 2.2.7 (not very nice:-(, I would need group support
for policy)
>- -- Switch to tdbsam with fam/rsync/ssh-ing password and group
mappings (very ugly and error prone :-()
>- -- Wait, in hope of a solution/workaround
>Please give me an advice,...
2003 Oct 23
1
Bug #596=Bug #532
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm the unhappy reporter of bug596, and I would like to report that bugs
#596 and #532 are 100% the same, I've experimented today with tdbsam,
and found conclusions about the number of users (under a limited number
of users Win9x can get the list of users if there are more users than
that don't, no mater that I've u...