peter.a.bryant@mainroads.qld.gov.au
2003-Mar-19 07:02 UTC
[Samba] Possible Bug?? (was: Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok)
Please lend me some expertise... Ok, I know suggesting a bug is a bit impolite, but I cannot find a solution for this and none of the helpful people who have responded have been able to help either... If I come off sounding a bit short it's just because I've tried many things to get these older clients printing. :-) Don't mean to annoy anyone. Appreciate any help! Have several pressing reasons to upgrade to newest Samba (including latest security fix) but cannot do this if it means the Win9x clients can't print. The important point here is that everyone is printing fine on old Samba server. Have replicated permissions and conf file is pretty much the same for the new Samba server. It isn't a permissions thing because the Win9x clients are successfully sending the print job to the spool directory. Then the print job is getting stuck there. The job being stuck in the spool directory doesn't stop others from printing though. (Other NT, 2000, XP clients that is) Obviously most people are able to print from Win9x . Just wondering if maybe this is a Solaris + HP printers thing?? Thought maybe it was a printer driver issue, But it is printing okay from the old Samba so surely this is not the problem? Any ideas? Can anyone replicate my problem? Is anyone else using Solaris + HP + Samba 2.2.7a ? thanks & sorry -peter. RE: [Samba] Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok (re Printing is working fine for our Windows NT, 2000 and XP clients. However, with windows 95 & 98, the print job gets put into the Samba spool directory (path = /var/spool/lp/tmp/samba) but doesn't make it to the printer. The print files stay there in the directory - don't get removed. Samba version is 2.2.7a, on Solaris 8 Printers are HP printers - e.g. HP 8100dn All clients including 95/98 were happily printing on a very much older version of Samba (2.0.6) network setup is a peer to peer network. printing directly from Unix to the printer is working ok (p.s. Just for a wild stab in the dark I tried setting the "disable spoolss = yes" but this stopped all printing from making it to the computer - even from the clients that were originally working.) relevant bits of conf. file included below... note that I don't have print command explicitly stated, but testparm indicates that it is configured properly... [global] printing = sysv lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j lppause command = lp -i %p-%j -H hold lpresume command = lp -i %p-%j -H resume load printers = no [hp8100DN1] printer = hp8100dn_1 comment = HP LaserJet hp8100 DN path = /var/spool/lp/tmp/samba guest account = nobody guest ok = yes browseable = yes printable = yes writable = yes ************************************************************ Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads, Queensland Transport or National Transport Secretariat, or endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the message from your computer. ************************************************************
Andrew Bartlett
2003-Mar-19 09:05 UTC
[Samba] Possible Bug?? (was: Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok)
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:02, peter.a.bryant@mainroads.qld.gov.au wrote:> > > Please lend me some expertise...Sure! See below:> RE: [Samba] Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok (re > > Printing is working fine for our Windows NT, 2000 and XP clients. > However, with windows 95 & 98, the print job gets put into the Samba > spool directory (path = /var/spool/lp/tmp/samba) but doesn't make it > to the printer. > The print files stay there in the directory - don't get removed.I think Samba is treating this like a file-share for non-NT (non-spoolss) printing.> [global] > printing = sysv > > lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j > lppause command = lp -i %p-%j -H hold > lpresume command = lp -i %p-%j -H resume > load printers = no > > [hp8100DN1] > printer = hp8100dn_1 > comment = HP LaserJet hp8100 DN > path = /var/spool/lp/tmp/samba > guest account = nobody > guest ok = yes > browseable = yes > printable = yes> writable = yesWell, I'll start by saying that this last statement will probably just confuse things - it might turn it back into a disk share. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet@samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet@hawkerc.net http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20030319/761d124e/attachment.bin
Raj Saxena
2003-Mar-19 09:20 UTC
[Samba] Possible Bug?? (was: Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok)
Hi, I am not running it that way but one thing you can do is probably print directly to your printer server? Do you have a jetdirect card in your printer? It is a work around but this way you can have the 95/98 print jobs get by till this is resolved. I have noticed on two occasions where i have some really weird things happening all to find out i had a corrupted smb.conf file. Go figure that one but i used a back copy just to see if that would cure my problem and it worked. Hope this helps a bit. Raj -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+rajan=ipisland.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+rajan=ipisland.com@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of peter.a.bryant@mainroads.qld.gov.au Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:03 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Possible Bug?? (was: Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok) Please lend me some expertise... Ok, I know suggesting a bug is a bit impolite, but I cannot find a solution for this and none of the helpful people who have responded have been able to help either... If I come off sounding a bit short it's just because I've tried many things to get these older clients printing. :-) Don't mean to annoy anyone. Appreciate any help! Have several pressing reasons to upgrade to newest Samba (including latest security fix) but cannot do this if it means the Win9x clients can't print. The important point here is that everyone is printing fine on old Samba server. Have replicated permissions and conf file is pretty much the same for the new Samba server. It isn't a permissions thing because the Win9x clients are successfully sending the print job to the spool directory. Then the print job is getting stuck there. The job being stuck in the spool directory doesn't stop others from printing though. (Other NT, 2000, XP clients that is) Obviously most people are able to print from Win9x . Just wondering if maybe this is a Solaris + HP printers thing?? Thought maybe it was a printer driver issue, But it is printing okay from the old Samba so surely this is not the problem? Any ideas? Can anyone replicate my problem? Is anyone else using Solaris + HP + Samba 2.2.7a ? thanks & sorry -peter. RE: [Samba] Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok (re Printing is working fine for our Windows NT, 2000 and XP clients. However, with windows 95 & 98, the print job gets put into the Samba spool directory (path = /var/spool/lp/tmp/samba) but doesn't make it to the printer. The print files stay there in the directory - don't get removed. Samba version is 2.2.7a, on Solaris 8 Printers are HP printers - e.g. HP 8100dn All clients including 95/98 were happily printing on a very much older version of Samba (2.0.6) network setup is a peer to peer network. printing directly from Unix to the printer is working ok (p.s. Just for a wild stab in the dark I tried setting the "disable spoolss = yes" but this stopped all printing from making it to the computer - even from the clients that were originally working.) relevant bits of conf. file included below... note that I don't have print command explicitly stated, but testparm indicates that it is configured properly... [global] printing = sysv lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j lppause command = lp -i %p-%j -H hold lpresume command = lp -i %p-%j -H resume load printers = no [hp8100DN1] printer = hp8100dn_1 comment = HP LaserJet hp8100 DN path = /var/spool/lp/tmp/samba guest account = nobody guest ok = yes browseable = yes printable = yes writable = yes ************************************************************ Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads, Queensland Transport or National Transport Secretariat, or endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the message from your computer. ************************************************************ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.462 / Virus Database: 261 - Release Date: 3/13/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.462 / Virus Database: 261 - Release Date: 3/13/2003
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Possible Bug?? (was: Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT ,2000, XP are ok)
- Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok (reposted)
- Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok (re posted)
- printing - Win95 & Win98 not working - NT,2000, XP are ok.
- Fw: Win95 & Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok (reposted)