On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 02:57, Chris Smith wrote:> Not including cases of unsupported clients for IPP printing (such as
> Windows NT) are there any reasons/caveats for installations running CUPS
> to not move over to IPP printing?
> Are there any features or benefits to Windows/Samba printing for Windows
> clients that make it superior compared to IPP?
Probably the most notable one is the printer driver download stuff, and
the fact that it looks and behaves like any other NT print server. I'm
not convinced that the optional IPP client from MS is really that well
tested, and from reports it doesn't handle authentication etc at all.
For many organizations, the need to install an optional client on each
computer kills things off pretty quickly.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet@samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet@hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20030213/feeb8093/attachment.bin