Heya, i got this problem with stubborn win98 machine refusing to show up on the browse list, my samba is the local/domain master browser and login server for the whole local network, using user security. the workstation has all the same protocols and settings like the other 6, only difference is the ip and the netbios name, the login used on that machine matches existing username on my linux machine, the user has working access to all the shares and can browse the rest of the workgroup with no problems, there is 2 shares on that machine, both working if i directly type \\machinename\sharename or just \\machinename then i can see all the shares listed. for the love of linux i can't figure out what i did/didn't do somewhere to make the machine not show on the browse list, considering i never had any other problem with samba at all. any of you guys had this problem and know how to fix it ? Thanks, Dingo. ).|.( '.'___'.' ' '(>~<)' ' -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-ooO-=(_)=-Ooo-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Debian version 2.2.20, up 8:47, 6 users, load average: 0.00 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- --- Seriously, the way I did this was by using a special /sbin/loader binary with debugging hooks that I made ("dd" is your friend: binary editors are for wimps). -- Linus Torvalds, in an article on a dnserver
On Monday 09 September 2002 10:39, Petr [Dingo] Dvorak wrote: [...]> the workstation has all the same protocols and settings like the other 6, > only difference is the ip and the netbios name, the login used on that > machine matches existing username on my linux machine, the user has > working access to all the shares and can browse the rest of the workgroup > with no problems, there is 2 shares on that machine, both working if i > directly type > \\machinename\sharename or just \\machinename then i can see all the shares > listed.This sounds so familiar :)> for the love of linux i can't figure out what i did/didn't do somewhere to > make the machine not show on the browse list, considering i never had any > other problem with samba at all.Well, you did nothing wrong :)> any of you guys had this problem and know how to fix it ?Yes for the first, no for the second, I'm afraid. As far as I could trace this, it's a win98 problem. We alsho have a box or two that won't play with the other boxes.. For one it went away as I configured samba to be a wins server, the other one still keeps seperate. Write a bug report to MS.. but get a fake mail address first. :) Cheers, Kai -- Kai Blin Linux system administrator Tel: Ring-86592 Allgemeine Chirurgie Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen In Minnesota they ask why all football fields in Iowa have artificial turf. It's so the cheerleaders won't graze during the game.