I have a couple Samba servers running 2.0.4a on Solaris 2.6. They generally give me no trouble, and have been stable for a long time. I'm in the process of qualifying 2.0.7, but feel no great urgency to upgrade. However, one day last week several users reported trouble getting to their files. I changed the debug level several times during the day to try to diagnose the problem. With interruptions, meetings, regular projects, and what-not, I never did figure out what was wrong with Samba, and the problems apparently went away. Now, I'm getting reports of corrupted files with date-stamps of the day we had the problem. The corruption I'm seing is chunks of Samba logfile interspersed with binary Excell spreadsheet data. The log data is directly related to the Excell file that was corrupted, containing stuff about the authentication of the user and the location of the file. If I stop and restart the Samba daemons while users are connected, am I risking this sort of damage? I've tested this a couple times, and have noticed no ill effects on the PC side. If smbd happened to be right in the middle of a file transaction when it was restarted, would it scribble on the file? At this point, I'm assuming that it is never safe to restart the daemons with users connected, but it would be nice if someone could explain the damage I'm seeing. My users are fearful and mistrustful of anything that's not Microsoft. Thanks! Paul Allen -- Paul L. Allen | voice: (425) 865-3297 fax: (425) 865-2964 Unix Technical Support | paul.l.allen@boeing.com Boeing Phantom Works Math & Computing Technology Site Operations, POB 3707 M/S 7L-68, Seattle, WA 98124-2207