I am going to make an opinionated comment here. This is just my opinion and everyone has one. I think rails is the best framework out there. But I think all these frameworks do not solve any actual problems. They just abstract problems to simpler forms. On the other hand nodejs actually created a new and revolutionary way to develop web applications easily. Almost like writing a simple script. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
On 29 August 2011 22:07, Alex <alex.katebi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > I am going to make an opinionated comment here. This is just my > opinion and everyone has one.o·pin·ion [uh-pin-yuhn] –noun 1. a belief or judgment that rests on grounds *insufficient to produce complete certainty*. (my emphases)> I think rails is the best framework out there. But I think all these > frameworks do not solve any actual problems.No? One problem they solve is to take the grind out of building web apps - all the repetitive stuff that you need to do with every new app. With that labour freed-up, the developer can now concentrate on the specific domain problems.> On the other hand nodejs actually created > a new and revolutionary way to develop web applications easily. Almost > like writing a simple script.And what "problem" does that solve? Are you suggesting that the Ruby code in Rails is not simple? Or that in comparison, a developer can write more simple scripts in NodeJS than they can in Ruby? I''m struggling to see the rationale for you "opinion". I certainly can''t see any historical weight to your voice that would lend you any credence, and as such, you''re really sounding like a troll. Your biggest flaw (which is common in these "my dad vs. your dad" postures) is that you''re not comparing apples to apples. NodeJS is an event-driven server scripting environment, which Rails is nothing of the kind. You might as well have said " I think all these frameworks do not solve any actual problems. On the other hand a crocodile has really big jaws." - It would have been more curious to read :-/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
<fernando.garcia-kMkgtkF/GPAVxob4FlrF8A@public.gmane.org>
2011-Aug-30 09:02 UTC
Re: rails vs. nodejs
+1 On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:32:00 +0100, Michael Pavling <pavling-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On 29 August 2011 22:07, Alex <alex.katebi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >> I am going to make an opinionated comment here. This is just my >> opinion and everyone has one. > > o·pin·ion [uh-pin-yuhn] > –noun > 1. a belief or judgment that rests on grounds *insufficient to produce > complete certainty*. > (my emphases) > >> I think rails is the best framework out there. But I think all these >> frameworks do not solve any actual problems. > > No? One problem they solve is to take the grind out of building web > apps - all the repetitive stuff that you need to do with every new > app. With that labour freed-up, the developer can now concentrate on > the specific domain problems. > >> On the other hand nodejs actually created >> a new and revolutionary way to develop web applications easily. Almost >> like writing a simple script. > > And what "problem" does that solve? > Are you suggesting that the Ruby code in Rails is not simple? Or that > in comparison, a developer can write more simple scripts in NodeJS > than they can in Ruby? > > I''m struggling to see the rationale for you "opinion". I certainly > can''t see any historical weight to your voice that would lend you any > credence, and as such, you''re really sounding like a troll. > > Your biggest flaw (which is common in these "my dad vs. your dad" > postures) is that you''re not comparing apples to apples. > NodeJS is an event-driven server scripting environment, which Rails is > nothing of the kind. You might as well have said " I think all these > frameworks do not solve any actual problems. On the other hand a > crocodile has really big jaws." - It would have been more curious to > read :-/-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.