A pseudo poll on AR error handling... With AR, you have the choice between the following: (1) if thing.save go_for_it else handle_the_error end (2) begin thing.save! rescue RecordInvalid => error handle_the_error end (3) override rescue_action_in_public (ala the recipes book) or do something homegrown, and then just thing.save! --- The questions are: -Which idiom do you use and why? -Are you consistent across your app/controllers, or do you mix and match? -Or do you just trust the gods of the Database and skip error handling altogether? Keith -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Hello Keith ! 2006/4/24, Keith Lancaster <klancaster1957@gmail.com>:> -Which idiom do you use and why?redirect_to() && return if model.save> -Are you consistent across your app/controllers, or do you mix and > match?Depends on what I''m doing. If the probability of having invalid data is feeble (setting a flag on/off, changing a status), I''ll use model.save!, to ensure no invalid data is left hanging.> -Or do you just trust the gods of the Database and skip error handling > altogether?Yikes, who would do that ? Where do I put that chicken ? Bye ! -- Fran?ois Beausoleil http://blog.teksol.info/
Maybe Matching Threads
- rescue_action_in_public question
- writing tests for rescue_action_in_public
- How do I call the exception_notifier from my own rescue_action_in_public ?
- issue with rescue_action_in_public! and testing 404 responses
- Exceptions in functional tests (rescue_action_in_public! broken?)