Rails - Jan 2006 - Can''t install rails, instructions in the book are wrong....

I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With Rails", I 
download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then type the 
command that came right out of the book.

C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies

and it doesn''t even work:

C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe" "C:\ruby\bin\gem" install
rails
--include-dependencies
ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
    invalid option: --include-dependencies

Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?

Greg


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I am not sure the correct option to automatically accept the
dependencies. However, I have installed it a few times and there were
only 5 prompts, in quick succession, to say "y" to.

If you want to get it installed, skip the "--include-dependencies"
option and just accept the dependencies when prompted.

Chris

On 24/01/06, Greg <ghill4848@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
> I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With Rails", I
> download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then type the
> command that came right out of the book.
>
> C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
>
> and it doesn''t even work:
>
> C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe" "C:\ruby\bin\gem"
install rails
> --include-dependencies
> ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
>     invalid option: --include-dependencies
>
> Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?
>
> Greg
>
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>

--
Chris Lamb
----------------------------------------------------------
chris.quijote@googlemail.com

Sorry, Chris.  I didn''t even mention that the next thing I tried was 
what you suggested, and this is what I got:

gem install rails
Attempting local installation of ''rails''
 -> Local installation can''t proceed due to LoadError:
Could not find RubyGem activesupport (= 1.2.5)
Attempting remote installation of ''rails''
Successfully installed rails_analyzer_tools, version 1.1.0
Installing RDoc documentation for rails_analyzer_tools-1.1.0...

Seems to have worked, right?  But I thought I would then find a 
"rails.exe" file, since the book clearly states that "rails"
is a
command.  I found no such file, and so it''s very hard for me to tell if
I am wrong, or if the installation stuff just isn''t working.

Greg

Chris Lamb wrote:
> I am not sure the correct option to automatically accept the
> dependencies. However, I have installed it a few times and there were
> only 5 prompts, in quick succession, to say "y" to.
> 
> If you want to get it installed, skip the
"--include-dependencies"
> option and just accept the dependencies when prompted.
> 
> Chris
> 
> On 24/01/06, Greg <ghill4848@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> --include-dependencies
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>
> 
> 
> --
> Chris Lamb

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Greg wrote:
>> If you want to get it installed, skip the
"--include-dependencies"
>> option and just accept the dependencies when prompted.
>> 
Save yourself some hassle and go download InstantRails 1.0.

http://instantrails.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Jan 24, 2006, at 4:53 PM, Kevin Olbrich wrote:
> Save yourself some hassle and go download InstantRails 1.0.
Or go buy a Mac. :-)

Ha, ha. Just kidding. Sort of.

About the Rails executable -- mine is in c:\ruby\bin\, named  
rails.cmd. Your %PATH% should include c:\ruby\bin\ (or its equivalent  
on your machine) in order to get this to work as the book describes.

Hope this helps,
David

>
>
> C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies


gem install rails -y

if you type:  gem help install
you will see a list of options


--
Andrew Stone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060125/78ee502b/attachment.html

Greg wrote:
> I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
> I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With Rails", I 
> download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then type the 
> command that came right out of the book.
> 
> C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
> 
> and it doesn''t even work:
> 
> C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe" "C:\ruby\bin\gem"
install rails
> --include-dependencies
> ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
>     invalid option: --include-dependencies
> 
> Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
I just had this problem yesterday... resolved it by updating rubygems! The
version I had didn''t understand the
"include-dependencies" option.

I also discovered yesterday that I''ve had rails 0.10.0 for a while and
didn''t know it because gem was considering that
later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version number as a gem
option but I don''t remember the exact
syntax. Ben Rubenstien, I think that was you, right?

b

> I also discovered yesterday that I''ve had rails 0.10.0 for a while
and
> didn''t know it because gem was considering that
> later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version number as
> a gem option but I don''t remember the exact
> syntax. Ben Rubenstien, I think that was you, right?
>
Wow ~ Riding the 0.10.0 ~ !  No, that wasn''t me :(... My guess though
is
that the problem here is with the gems install(?).  Might try running gem
--version to insure it is the latest version.  I would also insure the ruby
-v produces 1.8.4.  Also check the PATH variable to ensure that ruby is in
it...

~ Ben

On 1/24/06, Ben Munat <bent@munat.com> wrote:
>
> Greg wrote:
> > I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
> > I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With
Rails", I
> > download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then type the
> > command that came right out of the book.
> >
> > C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
> >
> > and it doesn''t even work:
> >
> > C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe"
"C:\ruby\bin\gem" install rails
> > --include-dependencies
> > ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
> >     invalid option: --include-dependencies
> >
> > Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
>
> I just had this problem yesterday... resolved it by updating rubygems! The
> version I had didn''t understand the
> "include-dependencies" option.
>
> I also discovered yesterday that I''ve had rails 0.10.0 for a while
and
> didn''t know it because gem was considering that
> later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version number as
> a gem option but I don''t remember the exact
> syntax. Ben Rubenstien, I think that was you, right?
>
> b
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>


--
Ben Reubenstein
http://www.benr75.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060125/628f2dbb/attachment.html

The syntax is:

gem install rails --version=1.0.0

And if your gem command does not support the --include-dependencies  
option it means your gem command is old so upgrad it!:

gem update --system

Cheers-
-Ezra


On Jan 24, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Ben Reubenstien wrote:
>
> I also discovered yesterday that I''ve had rails 0.10.0 for a while
> and didn''t know it because gem was considering that
> later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version  
> number as a gem option but I don''t remember the exact
> syntax. Ben Rubenstien, I think that was you, right?
>
> Wow ~ Riding the 0.10.0 ~ !  No, that wasn''t me :(... My guess  
> though is that the problem here is with the gems install(?).  Might  
> try running gem --version to insure it is the latest version.  I  
> would also insure the ruby -v produces 1.8.4.  Also check the PATH  
> variable to ensure that ruby is in it...
>
> ~ Ben
>
> On 1/24/06, Ben Munat <bent@munat.com > wrote: Greg wrote:
> > I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
> > I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With
Rails", I
> > download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then  
> type the
> > command that came right out of the book.
> >
> > C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
> >
> > and it doesn''t even work:
> >
> > C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe"
"C:\ruby\bin\gem" install rails
> > --include-dependencies
> > ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
> >     invalid option: --include-dependencies
> >
> > Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
>
> I just had this problem yesterday... resolved it by updating  
> rubygems! The version I had didn''t understand the
> "include-dependencies" option.
>
> I also discovered yesterday that I''ve had rails 0.10.0 for a while
> and didn''t know it because gem was considering that
> later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version  
> number as a gem option but I don''t remember the exact
> syntax. Ben Rubenstien, I think that was you, right?
>
> b
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ben Reubenstein
> http://www.benr75.com
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
-Ezra Zygmuntowicz
Yakima Herald-Republic
WebMaster
http://yakimaherald.com
509-577-7732
ezra@yakima-herald.com

Oh... sorry... Ezra not Ben... two names I see a lot here. :-)

thanks you guys and keep it up! :-D

b

Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:
> The syntax is:
> 
> gem install rails --version=1.0.0
> 
> And if your gem command does not support the --include-dependencies  
> option it means your gem command is old so upgrad it!:
> 
> gem update --system
> 
> Cheers-
> -Ezra
> 
> 
> On Jan 24, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Ben Reubenstien wrote:
> 
>>
>> I also discovered yesterday that I''ve had rails 0.10.0 for a
while
>> and didn''t know it because gem was considering that
>> later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version  
>> number as a gem option but I don''t remember the exact
>> syntax. Ben Rubenstien, I think that was you, right?
>>
>> Wow ~ Riding the 0.10.0 ~ !  No, that wasn''t me :(... My guess
though
>> is that the problem here is with the gems install(?).  Might  try 
>> running gem --version to insure it is the latest version.  I  would 
>> also insure the ruby -v produces 1.8.4.  Also check the PATH  variable 
>> to ensure that ruby is in it...
>>
>> ~ Ben
>>
>> On 1/24/06, Ben Munat <bent@munat.com > wrote: Greg wrote:
>> > I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
>> > I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With
Rails", I
>> > download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then 
type the
>> > command that came right out of the book.
>> >
>> > C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
>> >
>> > and it doesn''t even work:
>> >
>> > C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe"
"C:\ruby\bin\gem" install rails
>> > --include-dependencies
>> > ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
>> >     invalid option: --include-dependencies
>> >
>> > Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?
>> >
>> > Greg
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I just had this problem yesterday... resolved it by updating  
>> rubygems! The version I had didn''t understand the
>> "include-dependencies" option.
>>
>> I also discovered yesterday that I''ve had rails 0.10.0 for a
while
>> and didn''t know it because gem was considering that
>> later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version  
>> number as a gem option but I don''t remember the exact
>> syntax. Ben Rubenstien, I think that was you, right?
>>
>> b
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Ben Reubenstein
>> http://www.benr75.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> 
> 
> -Ezra Zygmuntowicz
> Yakima Herald-Republic
> WebMaster
> http://yakimaherald.com
> 509-577-7732
> ezra@yakima-herald.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails

Thanks to everyone for your e-mails.  The book seems to mistakenly 
believe that all that is required is 1.8.2 and that''s not quite true. 
What threw me off was believing that statement, so I downloaded 
ruby182-14.exe, which was built on
2005-01-01, and unfortunately the "gem" there wasn''t
compatible with the
instructions in the book.  "gem update rails --include-dependencies" 
gave the syntax error that I previously mentioned.  That led me down all 
kinds of bad trails.  Tonight I went back to 
http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=167 and installed ruby182-15.exe, 
which was built 2005-04-20, and this has a "gem" that supports the 
syntax mentioned in the book.

I just have one more set of questions: Since building Windows one-click 
installations seems to lag far behind the UNIX builds, could someone 
please tell me if I ever have to again even worry about this?

What I mean is: Now that I have ruby, gem, and rails, is there now one 
"gem update ..." command that I can use that will update _everything_,
even ruby?

Right now I still have ruby 1.8.2.  I have done "gem update --system",
as one of you suggested.  gem -v now gives me 0.8.11, but I don''t know 
if that''s the latest or not.  Finally, I noticed that it installed 
rails-1.0.0, and I assume that that is the latest.

I tried to upgrade ruby itself via "gem update ruby", but that just
gave
me errors.

Now that I have a "stable" system, I am reluctant to try to unzip some
new Ruby zipfile into a directory that I originally created via a 
Windows one-click install, but maybe they have separated things cleanly 
enough that that won''t hurt anything.

Is it completely safe to update ruby by simply grabbing the latest 
zipfile and extracting into my ruby directory?

Thanks again.

Greg





Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:
> The syntax is:
> 
> gem install rails --version=1.0.0
> 
> And if your gem command does not support the --include-dependencies
> option it means your gem command is old so upgrad it!:
> 
> gem update --system
> 
> Cheers-
> -Ezra
> 
> 
> On Jan 24, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Ben Reubenstien wrote:
> 
>> would also insure the ruby -v produces 1.8.4.  Also check the PATH  
>> >
>> >
>> later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version  
>>
>> -- 
>> Ben Reubenstein
>> http://www.benr75.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails mailing list
>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> 
> -Ezra Zygmuntowicz
> Yakima Herald-Republic
> WebMaster
> http://yakimaherald.com
> 509-577-7732
> ezra@yakima-herald.com

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

You''ve got an old version of RubyGems. I missed the beginning of this
thread, but if you''re on Windows you should get the latest version of
the one-click installer (182-15) as it comes with a newer version of
RubyGems. Otherwise, download the new version of RubyGems from
RubyForge and install it and your problem should be fixed.

Curt

On 1/24/06, Greg <ghill4848@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, Chris.  I didn''t even mention that the next thing I tried
was
> what you suggested, and this is what I got:
>
> gem install rails
> Attempting local installation of ''rails''
>  -> Local installation can''t proceed due to LoadError:
> Could not find RubyGem activesupport (= 1.2.5)
> Attempting remote installation of ''rails''
> Successfully installed rails_analyzer_tools, version 1.1.0
> Installing RDoc documentation for rails_analyzer_tools-1.1.0...
>
> Seems to have worked, right?  But I thought I would then find a
> "rails.exe" file, since the book clearly states that
"rails" is a
> command.  I found no such file, and so it''s very hard for me to
tell if
> I am wrong, or if the installation stuff just isn''t working.
>
> Greg
>
> Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I am not sure the correct option to automatically accept the
> > dependencies. However, I have installed it a few times and there were
> > only 5 prompts, in quick succession, to say "y" to.
> >
> > If you want to get it installed, skip the
"--include-dependencies"
> > option and just accept the dependencies when prompted.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On 24/01/06, Greg <ghill4848@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> --include-dependencies
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rails mailing list
> >> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chris Lamb
>
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>

Greg wrote:
> 
> I just have one more set of questions: Since building Windows one-click 
> installations seems to lag far behind the UNIX builds, could someone 
> please tell me if I ever have to again even worry about this?
> 
Not quite sure what you mean by this... you can use instantrails to 
install it all right now, and it even has ruby 1.8.4.

http://instantrails.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl

Once you have that all installed you can use the gem system to update 
rails as usual.

_Kevin

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Greg-

	You now have the latest version of gem 0.8.11 . Gems is only a  
package manger for software written in ruby and not for ruby itslef.  
You cannot update the ruby binary through gems. But many people are  
using ruby 1.8.2 still to do rails work, myself included. ANd  
rails1.0.0 is also the latest stable release.

	In order to keep your riuibygems up to date you can run this command:
gem update --system

in order to keep all your ruby packages installed via gem you can run:
gem update

	You should have a nice stable set up now that won''t need to change  
until you decide to move to ruby1.8.4

Cheers-
-Ezra

On Jan 24, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Greg wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for your e-mails.  The book seems to mistakenly
> believe that all that is required is 1.8.2 and that''s not quite
true.
> What threw me off was believing that statement, so I downloaded
> ruby182-14.exe, which was built on
> 2005-01-01, and unfortunately the "gem" there wasn''t
compatible
> with the
> instructions in the book.  "gem update rails
--include-dependencies"
> gave the syntax error that I previously mentioned.  That led me  
> down all
> kinds of bad trails.  Tonight I went back to
> http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=167 and installed ruby182-15.exe,
> which was built 2005-04-20, and this has a "gem" that supports
the
> syntax mentioned in the book.
>
> I just have one more set of questions: Since building Windows one- 
> click
> installations seems to lag far behind the UNIX builds, could someone
> please tell me if I ever have to again even worry about this?
>
> What I mean is: Now that I have ruby, gem, and rails, is there now one
> "gem update ..." command that I can use that will update
_everything_,
> even ruby?
>
> Right now I still have ruby 1.8.2.  I have done "gem update
--system",
> as one of you suggested.  gem -v now gives me 0.8.11, but I don''t
know
> if that''s the latest or not.  Finally, I noticed that it installed
> rails-1.0.0, and I assume that that is the latest.
>
> I tried to upgrade ruby itself via "gem update ruby", but that
just
> gave
> me errors.
>
> Now that I have a "stable" system, I am reluctant to try to unzip
some
> new Ruby zipfile into a directory that I originally created via a
> Windows one-click install, but maybe they have separated things  
> cleanly
> enough that that won''t hurt anything.
>
> Is it completely safe to update ruby by simply grabbing the latest
> zipfile and extracting into my ruby directory?
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
> Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:
>> The syntax is:
>>
>> gem install rails --version=1.0.0
>>
>> And if your gem command does not support the --include-dependencies
>> option it means your gem command is old so upgrad it!:
>>
>> gem update --system
>>
>> Cheers-
>> -Ezra
>>
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Ben Reubenstien wrote:
>>
>>> would also insure the ruby -v produces 1.8.4.  Also check the PATH
>>>>
>>>>
>>> later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Ben Reubenstein
>>> http://www.benr75.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rails mailing list
>>> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>>
>> -Ezra Zygmuntowicz
>> Yakima Herald-Republic
>> WebMaster
>> http://yakimaherald.com
>> 509-577-7732
>> ezra@yakima-herald.com
>
>
> -- 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
-Ezra Zygmuntowicz
WebMaster
Yakima Herald-Republic Newspaper
ezra@yakima-herald.com
509-577-7732

Just use One Click Ruby Installer for Windows and you won''t have this
problem. (Just verified this yesterday).


-----Original Message-----
From: rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org
[mailto:rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org] On Behalf Of Ben Munat
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:40 PM
To: rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
Subject: Re: [Rails] Can''t install rails,instructions in the book are
wrong....


Greg wrote:
> I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
> I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With Rails", I
> download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then type the
> command that came right out of the book.
> 
> C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
> 
> and it doesn''t even work:
> 
> C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe" "C:\ruby\bin\gem"
install rails
> --include-dependencies
> ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
>     invalid option: --include-dependencies
> 
> Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
I just had this problem yesterday... resolved it by updating rubygems!
The version I had didn''t understand the 
"include-dependencies" option.

I also discovered yesterday that I''ve had rails 0.10.0 for a while and
didn''t know it because gem was considering that 
later than 1.0!! Someone suggested specifying the rails version number
as a gem option but I don''t remember the exact 
syntax. Ben Rubenstien, I think that was you, right?

b
_______________________________________________
Rails mailing list
Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails

Hi!
   your problem is due to firewall. You disable firewall windows XP and 
programs mask ips like steagnos anonymous, zone alarm, etc. I use 
windows xp with distribution ruby 1.8.2 i haven''t problems before 
uninstall this programs.

JCV
<http://digg.com/security/Anonymous_Browsing_Proxy_List_%28Steagnos%29>

Greg escribi?:
> I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
> I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With Rails", I 
> download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then type the 
> command that came right out of the book.
>
> C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
>
> and it doesn''t even work:
>
> C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe" "C:\ruby\bin\gem"
install rails
> --include-dependencies
> ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
>     invalid option: --include-dependencies
>
> Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?
>
> Greg
>
>
>   

-- 

*Juan Carlos Viota Garrido*

*Sine95***

Gran V?a 43, 2? plta.

Madrid 28013

Tel.: 91 548 20 90

Fax: 91 548 42 55
www.sine95.com <http://www.sine95.com/>

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener 
informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario 
indicado, queda notificado de que la utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia 
sin autorizaci?n est? prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si 
ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique 
inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n.

 

This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain 
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by professional 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified 
that any use, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly 
prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please 
immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060125/7987e1ef/attachment.html

I have Ruby from the latest one click installer and ran that same
exact gem command with no problems last week.

later...
jim

On 1/24/06, Greg <ghill4848@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I can''t even get Rails installed in Windows XP.
> I follow the directions in "Agile Web Development With Rails", I
> download Ruby, then RubyGems, and I install those, and I then type the
> command that came right out of the book.
>
> C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
>
> and it doesn''t even work:
>
> C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe" "C:\ruby\bin\gem"
install rails
> --include-dependencies
> ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
>     invalid option: --include-dependencies
>
> Hard to believe.  Did I do something wrong?
>
> Greg
>
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>

Juan Carlos Viota SINE95 wrote:
> Hi!
>    your problem is due to firewall. You disable firewall windows XP and 
> programs mask ips like steagnos anonymous, zone alarm, etc. I use 
> windows xp with distribution ruby 1.8.2 i haven''t problems before 
> uninstall this programs.
> 
> Greg escribi?:
> 
>>
>>C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
>>
>>and it doesn''t even work:
>>
>>C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe" "C:\ruby\bin\gem"
install rails
>>--include-dependencies
>>ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
>>    invalid option: --include-dependencies
No, I''m pretty sure this is a gem version error... why would a firewall
issue cause an
InvalidOption error in ruby''s OptionParser? Plus, I don''t have
any firewall software and I
had this error; then I updated rubygems and it went away.

b

it''s true. you are right.

That version is of gem?

&

don''t work? |*
    c:\ruby\gem update

*|bye. JCV

Ben Munat escribi?:
> Juan Carlos Viota SINE95 wrote:
>> Hi!
>>    your problem is due to firewall. You disable firewall windows XP 
>> and programs mask ips like steagnos anonymous, zone alarm, etc. I use 
>> windows xp with distribution ruby 1.8.2 i haven''t problems
before
>> uninstall this programs.
>>
>> Greg escribi?:
>>
>>>
>>> C:\ruby>gem install rails --include-dependencies
>>>
>>> and it doesn''t even work:
>>>
>>> C:\ruby>"C:\ruby\bin\ruby.exe"
"C:\ruby\bin\gem" install rails
>>> --include-dependencies
>>> ERROR:  While executing gem ... (OptionParser::InvalidOption)
>>>    invalid option: --include-dependencies
>
> No, I''m pretty sure this is a gem version error... why would a 
> firewall issue cause an InvalidOption error in ruby''s
OptionParser?
> Plus, I don''t have any firewall software and I had this error;
then I
> updated rubygems and it went away.
>
> b
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1163 (20050707) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060125/03cb0df5/attachment.html