Luca Deckert
2011-Jul-28 08:37 UTC
[R] Fixed effects using Within transformation in PLM package
Hi all, I am trying to do my own fixed effects regression using the Within function in PLM. I apply the Within function to all my pseries and then run OLS on the transformed vectors using lm(). When I compare the results to those obtained via plm ("within"), the estimates are not always the same. Specifically, if there are missing values (NA), the parameter estimates are not the same. I am aware that standard errors and degrees of freedom have to be corrected. However, as far as I know the parameter estimates should be the same. Is R doing any specific correction for the missing values? I really appreciate any comments on this. Regards, Luca [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Luca Deckert
2011-Jul-28 13:21 UTC
[R] Fixed effects using Within transformation in PLM package
Dear R community, I am trying to do my own fixed effects regression using the Within function in PLM. I apply the Within function to all my pseries and then run OLS on the transformed vectors using lm(). When I compare the results to those obtained via plm ("within"), the estimates are not always the same. Specifically, if there are missing values (NA), the parameter estimates are not the same. I am aware that standard errors and degrees of freedom have to be corrected. However, as far as I know the parameter estimates should be the same. Is R doing any specific correction for the missing values? I really appreciate any comments on this. Regards, Luca [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Possibly Parallel Threads
- "Within" model in plm package: is the reported R-squared correct?
- Panel models: Fixed effects & random coefficients in plm
- Panel Data Analysis (PLM) - Fixed Effects - "cannot allocate vector of length"
- plm issues: error for "within" or "random", but not for "pooling"
- PLM package PGGLS strange behavior