search for: transformed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 12997 matches for "transformed".

2006 May 03
1
[LLVMdev] Patch for transform dependencies
Hi, A number of transforms are actually independent, so here's a partial fix. I updated the dependencies in a cluster of transforms: LowerSwitch, Mem2Reg, LowerSelect, LowerAllocations, UnifyFunctionExitNodes. The patch has been tested, but not extensively. PassManager doesn't complain, and the result of a test pass that requires all these (except for LowerAllocations) together works
2018 Jun 13
4
RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface
Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com> writes: > On 06/12/2018 12:04 AM, David A. Greene wrote: >> // PIA - PassInstrumentationAnalysis >> if (PIA->skipTransformation()) { >> return; >> } >> // Do it. >> PIA->didTransformation(); > That should be easily doable (though the interface would be part of > PassInstrumentation > rather
2007 Nov 01
0
2 commits - libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c test/image
libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c | 6 ++++-- test/image/Makefile.am | 7 +++++++ test/image/text-field-color-transform-6.swf |binary test/image/text-field-color-transform-6.swf.png |binary test/image/text-field-color-transform-7.swf |binary test/image/text-field-color-transform-7.swf.png |binary test/image/text-field-color-transform-8.swf
2013 Jan 04
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM A15
Hi folks, I've been playing with LLVM on a Chromebook (Ubuntu) and it seems to work quite well. Installing Ubuntu on the Chromebook was a breeze[1] and all tools/libs/headers required to check-out and build LLVM were accessible via apt-get. I had two problems to build it, but apart from those, it all ran smoother than I'd expected. I'll investigate the errors a bit deeper later on,
2008 Mar 26
1
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
Hi all, here comes the patch for the first wave of Use class size reduction. I have split it into 3 files, corresponding to - header changes - implementation changes - applications This at the moment does not contain the description how the size of the Use class will be reduced from 16 to 12 bytes, I am going to send that in a separate patch. This wave primarily consists of changes that are
2008 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again
Hi Dmitri, For what version of VS did you update the project files? Ted On May 17, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Dmitri Makarov wrote: > attached is the diff of vcprojs that need to be changed to fix the VS > build as of revision: 51224. > > I don't know if this catches all the missing bits, but this does build > all the way through. > > > Index: win32/Analysis/Analysis.vcproj
2018 Jan 15
3
Source level code transformation V.S. IR-level code transformation
Dear all, I'm working on a simple code transformation problem that can be described as below: for a C++ loop: *for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {* * a = M[i] + b;* * }* I want to transform it to: *int A[4]; * * for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {* * A[0] = M[i] + b;* * A[1] = M[i] + b;* * A[2] = M[i] + b;* * A[3] = M[i] + b;* *
2010 Jun 09
1
back transforming arcsine transformations in metafor
Hi everyone, I'm using the metafor package to meta-analyze a set of proportions. This is working really well for the raw proportions, but is there a way to back-transform the arcsine transformed proportions in the rma or forest functions with the atransf option? The estimates and CIs for the transformed proportions need to be back-transformed to be the sin of the estimate squared. Back-transforming the output isn't a big deal - it's the forest plots that I would need the back trans...
2008 May 17
3
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again
attached is the diff of vcprojs that need to be changed to fix the VS build as of revision: 51224. I don't know if this catches all the missing bits, but this does build all the way through. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: msvs.patch URL:
2012 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs
Duncan Sands <baldrick <at> free.fr> writes: > > > I would be happy if you give me an insight into what could have caused the > > difference. > > No idea. Maybe you forgot to turn optimizations on when compiling? Otherwise > you are going to have to send in your programs along with an explanation of how > you compiled them exactly (exact sequence of
2019 Oct 02
2
vectorize.enable
...ass-failed=transform-warning] > > For the example given in revert 858a1ae, in both cases before and after my commit, the loop vectoriser was bailing because "Not vectorizing: The exiting block is not the loop latch". The source looks like a straightforward canonical loop. What pass transformed it to have code between the exiting block and the latch? > But the difference is that vectorize_width() now implies vectorize(enable), and so this is now marked as forced vectorisation which wasn't the case before. Because of this forced vectorization, and that the transformation wasn'...
2011 Nov 16
0
Rip Blu-ray to Transformer Prime-Mac Blu-ray to Transformer
There are many people complaining that tablet PCs perform not so satisfactory when they are used to play videos. Actually, at first, tablet PC is developed as a mobile small PC that offers more convenient experience for being taken outside. So, it is not a professional media player that can fit all your playing requirements. And we should figure out that tablet PCs can playback most of videos
2012 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] Tool for loop transformations
...t your project straight: you are writing a tool that should (let's say) help students to identify what does a loop seems like after a chosen transformation. Is that the case? If so, your first objective would be isolating a loop transformation and avoid other transformations to mess up with the transformed loop, right? Well, as far as I know, every analysis and transformation in LLVM is a Pass. If you want to see which passes and the order that they were called, you could pass --debug-pass=Structure when using opt, and the PassManager will print the call list for you. If you want only one transform...
2012 Apr 24
4
[LLVMdev] Tool for loop transformations
...t; Watch the result (which should be in an input language or possibly in LLVM IR). I know that LLVM can do some of the loop transformations but as far as I know it decides itself what transformation (if any) will be done. Or am I mistaken? Is it possible to specify which loop is supposed to be transformed and how? Is it easily possible to get the (above mentioned) mark through the compiler frontend so it would appear in the LLVM IR as well? Then maybe I could write my own pass and use the `opt` command to run it on the .ll file and watch it before and after the pass. Am I mistaken? Is there a be...
2007 Sep 01
2
Comparing "transform" to "with"
Hi All, I've been successfully using the with function for analyses and the transform function for multiple transformations. Then I thought, why not use "with" for both? I ran into problems & couldn't figure them out from help files or books. So I created a simplified version of what I'm doing: rm( list=ls() ) x1<-c(1,3,3) x2<-c(3,2,1) x3<-c(2,5,2)
2007 Apr 10
4
[LLVMdev] cvs opt broken?
I checked out llvm from cvs & llvm-gcc from svn last night and again tonight. Each time they compiled and installed fine. After installing them, I recompiled compiler transforms I had written for opt. opt seems to load the my transform libraries fine, but it complains: opt: Unknown command line argument '-mytransform' whenever I try to specify one of my transforms on the opt
2019 Oct 02
2
vectorize.enable
Am Mi., 2. Okt. 2019 um 15:56 Uhr schrieb Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > > It's done by the WarnMissedTransformation and just looks for > > transformation metadata that is still in the IR after all passes that > > should have transformed them have ran. That is, it does not know why > > it is still there -- it could be because the LoopVectorize pass is not > > even in the pipeline -- and we cannot be more specific in the message. > > However, -Rpass-missed=loop-vectorize may give more information. > > As I re...
2015 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] Transforming SwitchInst to BranchInst
...--------------- Original program: * char grade; ... switch(grade) { case 'A' : printf("Excellent!\n" ); break; case 'B' : printf("Well done\n" ); break; default : printf("Invalid grade\n" ); }* may be transformed to something like *if (grad=='A') printf("Excellent!\n" );* *else if (grad=='B') printf("Well done\n" );* *else printf("Invalid grade\n" );* ------------------------------------------------- Are you aware of such a transform...
2020 Mar 27
2
[GSoC] Prospective student for Unify ways to move code or check if code is safe to be moved
Hi Rithik, CodeMoverUtils is not aimed for only loop transformations, it can be used by any transformation which want to move code or check if code is safe to be moved. It can currently do both hoist and sink but require control flow equivalent between the original location and the intended to be moved location. I would like to keep the API decoupled from loop, so other transformation can use it.
2018 Jan 15
1
Source level code transformation V.S. IR-level code transformation
...to transform it to: >> >> *int A[4]; * >> >> * for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {* >> * A[0] = M[i] + b;* >> * A[1] = M[i] + b;* >> * A[2] = M[i] + b;* >> * A[3] = M[i] + b;* >> * }* >> > > ​The transformed code should be > > *int A[4]; * > > * for (int i = 0; i < N; i+=4) {* > * A[0] = M[i] + b;* > * A[1] = M[i+1] + b;* > * A[2] = M[i+2] + b;* > * A[3] = M[i+3] + b;* > * }* > > ​I would suggest you manually rewrite the code,...