In the Value section of the 'seq' help page it says 'seq_along' and 'seq_length' always return an integer vector. I believe it should be 'seq_along' and 'seq_len' always return an integer vector. as there are no seq_length function? Best, Niels -- Niels Richard Hansen Web: www.math.ku.dk/~richard Associate Professor Email: Niels.R.Hansen at math.ku.dk Department of Mathematical Sciences nielsrichardhansen at gmail.com University of Copenhagen Skype: nielsrichardhansen.dk Universitetsparken 5 Phone: +45 353 20783 (office) 2100 Copenhagen ? +45 2859 0765 (mobile) Denmark
On 2010-09-03 2:05, Niels Richard Hansen wrote:> In the Value section of the 'seq' help page it says > > 'seq_along' and 'seq_length' always return an integer vector. > > I believe it should be > > 'seq_along' and 'seq_len' always return an integer vector. > > as there are no seq_length function? > > Best, Niels >Looks like that's fixed in R2.12.0. (It's always a good idea to check the development version.) -Peter Ehlers
Reasonably Related Threads
- The permutation of one vector into another
- Assignment to a slot in an S4 object in a list seems to violate copy rules?
- Error from sparse pattern matrix product
- How to use the RUnit tracker in unit tests?
- 'identical' and the warning "ignoring non-pairlist attributes"