search for: seq

...r the guest? > What happens when you ping the other way? > What does tcpdump show on both sides when you ping? ping -c 1 guest (10.100.100.74) -> external (10.91.73.252) (these are on the same subnet) guest: 15:29:51.342545 IP 10.100.100.74 > 10.91.73.252: ICMP echo request, id 64778, seq 1, length 64 15:29:51.342716 IP 10.91.73.252 > 10.100.100.74: ICMP echo reply, id 64778, seq 1, length 64 15:29:51.342734 IP 10.91.73.252 > 10.100.100.74: ICMP echo reply, id 64778, seq 1, length 64 15:29:51.342799 IP 10.91.73.252 > 10.100.100.74: ICMP echo reply, id 64778, seq 1, length 6...

...r the guest? > What happens when you ping the other way? > What does tcpdump show on both sides when you ping? ping -c 1 guest (10.100.100.74) -> external (10.91.73.252) (these are on the same subnet) guest: 15:29:51.342545 IP 10.100.100.74 > 10.91.73.252: ICMP echo request, id 64778, seq 1, length 64 15:29:51.342716 IP 10.91.73.252 > 10.100.100.74: ICMP echo reply, id 64778, seq 1, length 64 15:29:51.342734 IP 10.91.73.252 > 10.100.100.74: ICMP echo reply, id 64778, seq 1, length 64 15:29:51.342799 IP 10.91.73.252 > 10.100.100.74: ICMP echo reply, id 64778, seq 1, length 6...

...d with wireshark and both phones uses RFC 2833 and the trace looks pretty the same. Also the rtp debug log looks fine (see below). What could be the reason? thanks klaus trace: I have entered 1234#, but voicemail received as secret just 123. Got RTP packet from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 00, seq 042765, ts 4066332168, len 000160) Got RTP packet from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 00, seq 042766, ts 4066332328, len 000160) Got RTP packet from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 00, seq 042770, ts 4066332968, len 000160) Got RTP packet from 83.136.33.3:64118 (type 00, seq 042771, ts 4066333128,...

...or some reason the third loop below zero's-out everything in the sub-quadrant it is targeting, which is readily observable when viewing the matrix ("View(MAT)"). library(Matrix) MAT<-matrix(rnorm(1460*1460,mean=0,sd=1),nrow = 1460, ncol = 1460) #works great for (i in 1:365) { SEQ <- (i - 5):(i + 5) SEQ <- SEQ[SEQ > 0 & SEQ < 366] MAT[(1:365)[-SEQ], i] <- 0 } #works great for (i in 1:365) { SEQ <- (i - 5):(i + 5) SEQ <- SEQ[SEQ > 0 & SEQ < 366] MAT[(1:365)[-SEQ], i + 365] <- 0 } #zero's out everything, i...

...7 1:26 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> >>>>>> on Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:57:15 -0800 writes: > > This is a message for someone familiar with the implementation. > > Superficially the R code for seq.default and the C code for seq.int > > appear to be semantically very similar. My question is whether, in fact, > > it is intended that behave identically for all inputs. > > Strictly speaking, "no": As usual, RT?Manual (;-) > > The help page says in the...

...ontains x, y, and z coordinates for grid points whose elevation we sampled. The problem occurs when I try to add points using points3d. I tried to follow the code in the examples of the package pdf. First, I tried the following code to add all of the points that I wanted: >my.3dplot$points3d(seq(400,600,0.19), seq(600,400,0.295), seq(800,500,0.24), seq(1000,1400,0.22), seq(1200,600,0.24), seq(1200,1500,0.28), seq(1300,1400,0.205), seq(1700,500,0.26), seq(1700,600,0.21), seq(1900,1400,0.255), seq(2300,1400,0.275), seq(2600,1300,0.225), seq(2700,400,0.235), seq(2700,1300,0.265), seq(3100,100...

This is a message for someone familiar with the implementation. Superficially the R code for seq.default and the C code for seq.int appear to be semantically very similar. My question is whether, in fact, it is intended that behave identically for all inputs. I have found two cases so far where they differ, first that seq.int will coerce a character string to a real (via Rf_asReal) whereas...

Hi All; I am facing a problem that always the users confused and connect the telephone line coming from the telephone service provider to the FXS port and cause it to be damaged, specially if the card was 2 fxs and 2 fxo, so they make mistake and connect the line to fxs while it should be connected to fxo. What is the solution for this disaster? Regards Bilal

Hi Lars, I have no experience to use tcpdump, here is the output from TCPdump for your reference. Any idea? Use my home PC to ping company PC 01:00:25.154706 ethertype IPv4, IP 192.168.1.2 > 10.0.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 17, length 40 01:00:25.154706 IP 192.168.1.2 > 10.0.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 17, length 40 01:00:25.154706 IP 192.168.1.2 > 10.0.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 17, length 40 01:00:25.155177 IP 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: ICMP 10.0.0.2 protocol 1 port 19786 unreachable, length 68...

...ing SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Executing [41325122774 at from-sip:1] Answer("SIP/sipcall.ch-0000008d", "") in new stack > 0x7f3964080f30 -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to 123.456.789.123:20600 Got RTP packet from 123.456.789.123:20600 (type 00, seq 042281, ts 1387619622, len 000160) -- Executing [41325122774 at from-sip:2] Set("SIP/sipcall.ch-0000008d", "DB(lastcaller/number)=987654321") in new stack -- Executing [41325122774 at from-sip:3] GotoIf("SIP/sipcall.ch-0000008d", "0?black,1") in...

...cmptype] = icmp-echo and icmp[icmptype] != icmp-echoreply'' tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 19:45:30.283679 IP 192.168.1.180 > 192.168.1.124: ICMP echo request, id 61445, seq 23, length 64 19:45:31.285560 IP 192.168.1.180 > 192.168.1.124: ICMP echo request, id 61445, seq 24, length 64 # --- Pings from *centos-hvm* to default gateway *no ip-traffic on peth0* # --- root@xen411dom0:/ftp/HVM# tcpdump ''icmp[icmptype] = icmp-echo and icmp[icmptype] != icmp-ech...

hi, i have strange problem with no rtp packets from asterisk after dns query. see pcap below centos6/asterisk 13.9 + chan_sip 172.23.0.3 - asterisk 172.23.5.1/2 - voip phones any ideas/hints? 1170 25.028206000 172.23.0.3 -> 172.23.5.1 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x334508F6, Seq=49318, Time=1442112256 1171 25.045556000 172.23.5.1 -> 172.23.0.3 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x643C9869, Seq=4468, Time=716240 1172 25.045629000 172.23.0.3 -> 172.23.5.2 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x3566361, Seq=60990, Time=716240 1173 25.048134000 172.23.5.2 -> 1...

...s_fax.c: channel 'SIP/SOV20001-0007cb04' using FAX session '660' [Oct 14 14:16:17] DEBUG[11426] chan_sip.c: T38 state changed to 3 on channel SIP/SDSD0005-0007cb05 PCAP text output of 1st case: 216.025063 192.168.196.3 -> 192.168.196.94 RTP PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x6118CC28, Seq=4877, Time=1179871936 216.042133 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 RTP PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x205734A, Seq=8641, Time=2227760 216.045031 192.168.196.3 -> 192.168.196.94 RTP PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x6118CC28, Seq=4878, Time=1179872096 216.062169 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 RTP PT=...

Audio packets are running... 961 16.150421076 192.168.5.150 -> 192.168.5.25 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMU, SSRC=0x6A3E0AF1, Seq=28402, Time=73280 962 16.170411284 192.168.5.150 -> 192.168.5.25 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMU, SSRC=0x6A3E0AF1, Seq=28403, Time=73440 963 16.190381989 192.168.5.150 -> 192.168.5.25 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMU, SSRC=0x6A3E0AF1, Seq=28404, Time=73600 964 16.210387990 192.168.5.150 -> 192.168....

I wonder what is the history of "seq" and "seq.int"? >From "help(seq)", one reads that "'seq.int' is an internal generic which can be much faster but has a few restrictions". And indeed, "seq.int(1,99,by=2)" is over 40 times faster than "seq(1,99,by=2)" in a quick t...

...Maechler wrote: >>>>>>> Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> >>>>>>> on Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:57:15 -0800 writes: >> > This is a message for someone familiar with the implementation. >> > Superficially the R code for seq.default and the C code for seq.int >> > appear to be semantically very similar. My question is whether, in fact, >> > it is intended that behave identically for all inputs. >> >> Strictly speaking, "no": As usual, RT?Manual (;-) >>...

Full_Name: Jeremiah Cohen Version: 2.9.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (129.59.230.235) I believe there is a bug in the seq() function for certain values of the "from" argument. Here are examples: > seq(-.2, .1, .1) [1] -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 > seq(-.3, .1, .1) [1] -3.000000e-01 -2.000000e-01 -1.000000e-01 5.551115e-17 1.000000e-01 > seq(-.4, .1, .1) [1] -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 > seq(-.5, .1,...

Hello, Below is some example code that should reproduce an error I'm encountering while trying to create a tiff plot with two subplots. If I run just the following bit of code through the R GUI the result is what I'd like to have appear in the saved tiff image: x<-seq(0:20) y<-c(1,1,2,2,3,4,5,4,3,6,7,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,4,3,6) plot(x,y,type="l",las=1,ylim=c(0,12)) subplot(edm.sub(x[seq(1:5)],y[seq(1:5)]),x=4,y=9,size=c(1,1.5)) subplot(edm.sub(x[seq(15,20,by=1)],y[seq(15,20,by=1)]),x=17,y=9,size=c(1,1.5)) However, if expanding on this code with: edm.sub&...

...# create an example data frame, multiple events per subject year <- c(1980,1982,1996,1985,1987,1990,1991,1992,1999,1972,1983) event.of.interest <- c(F,T,T,F,F,F,T,F,T,T,F) subject <- c(1,1,1,2,2,3,3,3,3,4,4) df <- data.frame(cbind(subject,year,event.of.interest)) # add a per-subject sequence number df$subject.seq <- 1 for (i in 2:nrow(df)) { if (df$subject[i-1] == df$subject[i]) df$subject.seq[i] <- df$subject.seq[i-1] + 1 } df # add an event sequence number which is zero until the first # event of interest for that subject happens, and then increments # thereafter df$ev...

Dear R experts, I have two matrix (seq & mat) & I want to retrieve in a new matrix all the numbers from mat that =1 (corresponding to the same row/ column position) in seq, or all the numbers in mat that =-1 in seq. - Replace all the numbers with NA if it's not 1/-1 in seq. There are some "NA"s in seq. seq=matr...