ucgamdo@ucl.ac.uk
2003-Sep-03 11:19 UTC
[R] Re: normal distribution in samples of soil organisms.
Hi, You didn't specify the satistical model you are intereted in, I will suppose it is something like: #Organims ~ Landscape + Soil + Depth + Species I suppose you have a table of with something like... Spec Lands Soil Depth #Organisms A 1 1 1 10 A 1 2 1 2 B 1 1 1 0 B 2 2 2 2 ... etc, Normally, the count of organisms in soil samples follows a posisson distribution, not a normal one. You should effectively check for normality in your final data table, including the zeroes. In fact, you can do an anova and then do some diagnostics plots, in R you would do something like (suppose your table is stored in an object called my data): mydata.lm <- lm(Organisms ~ Spec + Lands + Soil + Depth, data = mydata) # fit a linear model anova(mydata.lm) # to print a nicely formatted anova table plot(mydata.lm) # to do some diagnostics plots If your data follows a poisson distribution, the qq plot obtained above will be strikingly deviated from a straight line. This plots are normally more useful than just obtaining p-values for normality tests. If your data is indeed deviated from normality, you should then apply a suitable transformation and repeat the analysis. I strongly adivice you to have a look at the book Biometry, by Robert R. Sokal and F. James Rohlf (1996), there are quite good examples in there and where and what transformations should be applied, specially trasnforming data from a poisson-like distribution to a normal one. Hope this helps. acovaleda at hotpop.com wrote:> Hi Sirs and Madams. > > My question is more statistical than related with the use of R softwareand I> hope it will not seems so silly and elemental. I'm analyzing a set of data > of some soil organism collected in diferent landscapes, soils taxa, and > depths. The sample was performed thinking in a factorial structure withfour> factors: Specie, Landscape, Soil and Depth. Because not all the species > appear in each sample there are so many zeros in the matrix data. > > Checking the normal distribution I'm not sure If I must check it in the > original sample data (without zeros) or in the big matrix with zeros. Inthe> first case there is a normal distribution (W = 0,85) but in the secondit is> not (W = 0,45). In which data must I check distribution?, Can I proceed to > perform a Parametric ANOVA?. > > Thanks >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- normal distribution
- estimating volume from xyz points
- problems with method ken.sto in package soil.spec: subscript out of bounds
- Ternary or Triangular Plots (soil texture triangle plot)?
- help! kennard-stone algorithm in soil.spec packages does not work for my dataset!!!