Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "adivic".
Did you mean:
adivice
2007 Jul 28
8
generating symmetric matrices
Greetings,
I have a seemingly simple task which I have not been able to solve today. I want to construct a symmetric matrix of arbtriray size w/o using loops. The following I thought would do it:
p <- 6
Rmat <- diag(p)
dat.cor <- rnorm(p*(p-1)/2)
Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, "<")] <- Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, ">")] <- dat.cor
However, the problem is that the matrix
2019 Jun 20
4
LastLogin update
Howdy,
I'd like an adive on what to use.
I have sql users, and i want to have the lastlogin of them, what is the
native option for this:
* Using last_login plugin which will give me the last login?
* Use postlogin for imap and pop3n which will give me besides
lastlogin the IP and protocol?
Thanks in advanced,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2007 Jul 30
3
Constructing correlation matrices
Greetings,
I have a seemingly simple task which I have not been able to solve today and I checked all of the help archives on this and have been unable to find anything useful. I want to construct a symmetric matrix of arbtriray size w/o using loops. The following I thought would do it:
p <- 6
Rmat <- diag(p)
dat.cor <- rnorm(p*(p-1)/2)
Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, "<")] <-
2007 May 11
2
megasr Sata Raid driver and the lastest kernel
Hi List
I'm trying to update to the lastest kernel but I have a dirver that is not
inculded in the distrubution, and I had to use the driver disk when installing
centos 4.4 in the first place, The driver megasr .ko works fine with the
installed kernel but I cannot find on for the updated kernel, any adive would
be appreciated.
without the updated driver there is a kernel panic on boot due to
2019 Jun 20
1
LastLogin update
Hi,
Cool howto, and for protocol would this have that option also?
From: dovecot <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Minta via
dovecot
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 18:37
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Subject: Re: LastLogin update
Hi,
this seems to work very well:
https://docs.iredmail.org/track.user.last.login.html
You could also add "rip = $rip" in
2003 Sep 02
1
problems with mediatrix 1204 FXO
I'm having a problem getting outbound trunking to work using asterisk
and an external SIP FXO.
7 digit dialing produces the following output:
-- Executing Dial("SIP/mitel-fe17", "SIP/5925660@mediatrix-1204") in new stack
-- Called 5925660@mediatrix-1204
-- SIP/mediatrix-1204-645e answered SIP/mitel-fe17
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/mitel-fe17 and
2019 Jun 20
0
LastLogin update
Hi,
this seems to work very well:
https://docs.iredmail.org/track.user.last.login.html
You could also add "rip = $rip" in "fields" for the ip address.
On 6/20/19 3:24 PM, Jorge Bastos via dovecot wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> I?d like an adive on what to use.
>
> I have sql users, and i want to have the lastlogin of them, what is
> the native option for this:
2007 Aug 29
0
Irq bug
Hi.
I''m trying to setup the serial port access from the domU following the
instructions at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/InstallationNotes.
So I addedd these configurations to the domU cfg file:
irq = [ 4 ]
ioports = [ "3f8-3ff" ]
When I create this new domU I get this error:
Error: function takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
Is it a bug? I read on this list that you
2006 Oct 24
2
Mixed conditional logit model
dear all,
i wonder whether it is possible to estimate a mixed (random parameters)
logit model in R. my dataset only includes conditional explanatory (RHS)
variables. i've already searched the R-help archives and found slightly
comparable questions but no satisfying answers. an old fashoined
conditional logit does not work due to the violation of the iia
property. a short description of
2004 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM languages cooperation
Hello Chris,
Chris Lattner wrote:
>This really stems from
>differing goals, though LLVM can certainly be used to compile MSIL-like
>systems, so it's just a matter of specifying the rules and making the
>front-ends stick to them. :)
>
>
Ok, this is clear. Do you plan any "foreign function interface" or
something similar that would ease, if not automate
2004 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] RE: LLVM languages cooperation
Chris Lattner wrote:
> BTW, you might want to check out this document that Reid wrote, which
>
>describes his experiences writing a front-end for LLVM, and giving lots of
>hints and tips: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Stacker.html
>
>
Thanks, I already had a quick look on it.
Also thanks for your explanation on how the C++ back-end converts
function calls to LLVM code.
As
2004 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] FYI: ccg
Hi LLVMers,
For your interest, I recently came across the ccg library "dynamic code
generation for C and C++".
--> http://www-sor.inria.fr/projects/vvm/realizations/ccg/ccg.html
It seems to share some points with LLVM.
-- Sébastien
2004 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Hi Valery,
Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
>>To me this appears more as an algorithmic design issue, this function
>>could be rewritten in "continuation passing style", and each
>>continuation could be distributed by a load-balancing strategy to the
>>computers sharing CPU resources. Using mechanisms such as "futures" (as
>>in Mozart) allows to do
2004 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM languages cooperation
Hi all,
I am an LLVM newbie, thinking about using LLVM as the platform for a toy
language.
In this respect, I was wondering if LLVM could be used to easily weave
code written in different language. For instance, let's assume I have a
library written in C, some components written in C++ and some components
written in OCaml (we also assume an OCaml backend for LLVM). All this
code gets
2004 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Hello Valery,
I have some comments regarding your thoughts on LLVM support for
distributed computing.
Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
>There should be an engine and layer for making dispatching optimizations in run-time. If one CPU is loaded and code is
>"parallelizable" why then not to send some part of
>calculation to other CPU? This kind of on-fly decision will
>be one day
2004 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Hello again Valery,
Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
> All benefits, what one could obtain from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU
> at single host", one might obtaine from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU
> at multiple hosts". Isn't that logical?
I see more precisely what you mean, but I don't think it is that
straightforward to generalise the benefits multiple CPU on