Tao Shi
2003-Jul-15 19:18 UTC
[R] Why two chisq.test p values differ when the contingency table is transposed?
I'm using R1.7.0 runing with Win XP. Thanks, ...Tao ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????>x[,1] [,2] [1,] 149 151 [2,] 1 8>t(x)[,1] [,2] [1,] 149 1 [2,] 151 8>chisq.test(x, simulate.p.value=T, B=100000)Pearson's Chi-squared test with simulated p-value (based on 1e+05 replicates) data: x X-squared = 5.2001, df = NA, p-value = 0.03774>chisq.test(t(x), simulate.p.value=T, B=100000)Pearson's Chi-squared test with simulated p-value (based on 1e+05 replicates) data: t(x) X-squared = 5.2001, df = NA, p-value = 0.01642
(Ted Harding)
2003-Jul-15 20:00 UTC
[R] Why two chisq.test p values differ when the contingency
On 15-Jul-03 Tao Shi wrote:>>x > [,1] [,2] > [1,] 149 151 > [2,] 1 8 >>t(x) > [,1] [,2] > [1,] 149 1 > [2,] 151 8 >>chisq.test(x, simulate.p.value=T, B=100000) > Pearson's Chi-squared test with simulated p-value (based on > 1e+05 replicates) > data: x > X-squared = 5.2001, df = NA, p-value = 0.03774 > >>chisq.test(t(x), simulate.p.value=T, B=100000) > Pearson's Chi-squared test with simulated p-value (based on > 1e+05 replicates) > data: t(x) > X-squared = 5.2001, df = NA, p-value = 0.01642Possibly you may just have been unlucky, though the 0.03774 seems large: c2x<-chisq.test(x, simulate.p.value=T, B=100000)$p.value for(i in (1:9)){c2x<-c(c2x,chisq.test(x, simulate.p.value=T, B=100000)$p.value)} c2tx<-chisq.test(tx, simulate.p.value=T, B=100000)$p.value for(i in (1:9)){c2tx<-c(c2tx,chisq.test(tx, simulate.p.value=T, B=100000)$p.value)} cbind(c2x,c2tx) c2x c2tx [1,] 0.01627 0.01720 [2,] 0.01672 0.01690 [3,] 0.01662 0.01669 [4,] 0.01733 0.01656 [5,] 0.01679 0.01777 [6,] 0.01715 0.01769 [7,] 0.01765 0.01769 [8,] 0.01703 0.01740 [9,] 0.01704 0.01708 [10,] 0.01669 0.01655 sd(c2x) [1] 0.0003946715 sd(c2tx) [1] 0.0004737099 Ted. -------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk> Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972 Date: 15-Jul-03 Time: 21:00:04 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
Reasonably Related Threads
- Why two chisq.test p values differ when the contingency
- The two chisq.test p values differ when the contingency table is transposed! (PR#3486)
- Numerical stability in chisq.test
- The two chisq.test p values differ when the contingency table (PR#3896)
- Should rint and nearbyint be always constrained?