> From: Don MacQueen [mailto:macq at llnl.gov]
>
> At 5:29 PM +0100 4/30/03, Luke Whitaker wrote:
> >
> >At the risk of starting a religous war, isn't java the obvious
choice
> >for a platform independent GUI ? I know java suffered a lot from
> >early over hypeing when it wasn't really ready, but in the last
year
> >or two I've seen some very impressive platform independent
GUI's
> >built with java.
>
> Not unless it's a whole lot better than Insightful's initial
> effort on Solaris.
>
> The GUI itself (i.e., how it operated, what menus were where, etc.)
> was fine, but it was completely useless for anyone sitting at a
> remote host, due to dreadful image quality and poor performance when
> displaying anywhere other than on the console of the machine on which
> SPlus was actually running.
>
> (maybe it was ok displayed on a remote host of the same architecture;
> I don't remember; but neither I nor any of the potential additional
> users was)
AFAIK the problem is the X server: it gives you a black window if the X
display is 16-bit. If you can live with 8-bit display, the Java GUI will
work. It's that way on all Unix (X?) platform.
Andy
> -Don
>
> >just my tuppence worth...
> >
> >Luke
> >
> >______________________________________________
> >R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> >https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------
> Don MacQueen
> Environmental Protection Department
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
> Livermore, CA, USA
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, cont... {{dropped}}