search for: relig

I have a puzzle.... When I include an interaction in the model, many predicted probabilities are above 1. Is that a problem with my model? I thought the predicted prob can't be bigger than 1... Any help would be really appreciated! Thanks! K. reg1<-glm(pyea~male+edu+married+inc+relig+factor(time)+ factor(time)*male, data=mydata, family=binomial(link="logit")) reg2<-predict.glm(reg1, se.fit=T, data.frame(male=1, edu=1, married=1,inc=1, relig=1, type='response', YEAR=seq(1,33,1)) reg2$fit $fit 1 2 3 4 5 6...

Hello, I'm trying to fit a pretty simple confirmatory factor analysis using the sem package. There's a CFA example in the examples, which is helpful, but the output for my (failing) model is hard to understand. I'd be interested in any other ways to do a CFA in R, if this proves troublesome. The CFA is replicating a 5 uncorrelated-factor structure (for those interested, it is a

I am wondering if anyone has any procedural documentation for installing and using Rails from the standalone packages rather then via ''gem install''. It seems there should be some steps outside of simply unpacking the tar ball in order to integate it with your Ruby installation. Seems every bit of installation documentation I can find has ''gem install

...default output? For example, I know that PROC MIXED and > lme( ) both yield p-values for fixed effects terms. > > The theory I am learning does not seem to match what is commonly > available in the software, and I am just wondering why. You shouldn't pay too much attention to the religeous ranting of blinkered Bayesians. Of course p-values should be taken with a grain of salt. But then so should everything else. Including Bayesian methods. Remember that all models are just that --- models. They are not reality. George Box said something like ``All models are wrong. Some mod...

> From: Don MacQueen [mailto:macq at llnl.gov] > > At 5:29 PM +0100 4/30/03, Luke Whitaker wrote: > > > >At the risk of starting a religous war, isn't java the obvious choice > >for a platform independent GUI ? I know java suffered a lot from > >early over hypeing when it wasn't really ready, but in the last year > >or two I've seen some very impressive platform independent GUI's > >built with...

I''m guessing this is a common use case, but I wasn''t able to find anything in the site FAQ. We''re looking at using Puppet on about 100 servers to control which user groups have access to which servers. The use case is as follows: We have Groups of servers, for example: CUSTOMERservers (serverA, serverB, ...,serverK) ADMINISTRATIVEservers

Hi Andy, I have had tremendous success running Asterisk on Slackware linux version 9.1. Its very quick to install and I had absolutely no problem compiling the source code for Asterisk or anything else so far. I have asterisk running on 2 servers right now that use Slackware. -James -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com

Hi all, First, sorry for posting this mail in a Samba-list, I first posted it to ldap@umich.edu which should be a general LDAP discussion list and also to OpenLDAP mailinglist. So far I didn't got a single reply in any of those lists but that's probably because this issue is much more AD-related than plain LDAP. And we know that beside MS the Samba developers know most about AD :-) So

To whom it may concern I tried to register, but I received no email. Tried anther email address - again no email. In both cases the wine forum sys had registered me, but without the confirmation email, I couldn't get on. I then created a yahoo web email - and this worked. So the sys can send to web accounts but evidently not to pop accounts.

...86_JUMP_SLOT ex_func Now in the asm here we can see that in the TAILCALL case the ex_func is looked up in GOT. $ grep ex_func a.s calll ex_func at PLT movl ex_func at GOT(%esi), %eax ... jmpl *%eax # TAILCALL I am aware that this might turn a bit religous however I think that always looking up the function pointer in PLT would eliminate this issue. I don't see a benefit of using the GOT in this particular case. The asm of both cases is reproduced at the end of this email. Code tarball: http://www.peereboom.us/clang_issue.tgz Code plainte...

Why isnt the RoR community focusing on robust and scalable mod_perl style of Apache environment, rather then splintering all over the place with lighthttp, mongrel, WEBrick, SCGI, fcgi, etc??? Its frustrating as someone who is trying to migrate to RoR. Its very unlikely I would ever get a contract to work on any webserver except Apache, so it would seem logicaly to focus all our efforts to

I''m very new to shorewall. My setup is IP Gateway (CentOS 4 + Shorewall) with 3 NIC cards. Shorewall works great on the firewall machine. Bind also works (local net machines get IPs fine). Under firestarter, all works great. With shorewall, the loc machines can not route past the firewall. They can connect to the firewall, but not past it. Exactly what information should I post to get