jonathan_li@agilent.com
2002-Feb-01 23:32 UTC
[R] R-ex directory in a R package; large software in R
Hi, To better organize a package, one sometimes wants to place some individual R files in R-ex directory (at least this is the way I understand the functionality of R-ex). But how does one organize the source R package so that R CMD INSTALL pkg will know which R files will go into the R-ex directory? In the implementation R CMD INSTALL pkg, all R files in the pkg/R directory are automatically merged into a single file. A more general and related question is: how does one organize R files in a package? Should they all just go into pkg/R? To create a large package, this way of organization is not very desirable. Most of R packages seem to be relatively small so far. But I am hoping that some larger software can be built around R. Can people comment on this? Thanks! Regards, Jonathan -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Thomas Lumley
2002-Feb-02 00:00 UTC
[R] R-ex directory in a R package; large software in R
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 jonathan_li at agilent.com wrote:> Hi, > > To better organize a package, one sometimes wants to place some individual R > files in R-ex directory (at least this > is the way I understand the functionality of R-ex).No. R-ex/ contains examples automatically extracted from the help pages. You can put tests in tests/ and other stuff you want installed in inst/> A more general and related question is: how does one organize R files in a > package? Should they all just go into pkg/R? To create a large package, this > way of organization is not very desirable. Most of R packages seem to be > relatively small so far. But I am hoping that some larger software can be > built around R. Can people comment on this?Presumably it wouldn't be too hard to allow the src/ and R/ subdirectories to have further subdirectories. On the other hand, if the source code really does break into nice modular subdirectories it probably should be a bundle of packages rather than a single package. Paul Gilbert has taken this approach with his time-series software, and in a sense R-base does this too. Also, there's no reason why the structure of a package has to reflect the structure of your development tree. You might have a huge set of subdirectories and a make target that produces an R package or bundle of packages. -thomas -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Testing! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20020201/e4cc12d6/attachment.html
Prof Brian D Ripley
2002-Feb-02 08:03 UTC
[R] R-ex directory in a R package; large software in R
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 jonathan_li at agilent.com wrote: [...]> A more general and related question is: how does one organize R files in a > package? Should they all just go into pkg/R? To create a large package, this > way of organization is not very desirable. Most of R packages seem to be > relatively small so far. But I am hoping that some larger software can be > built around R. Can people comment on this?I would dispute that there are not examples of large packages: certainly some involve man-years of work. You will notice that pkg/R is normally organized into files, each file containing a collection of related functions. It doen't need to be like that: rpart for example is `one function, one file' but built from a particular SCCS organization. But unless the project is really large that seems a natural level of granularity. As Thomas has commented, a source package is a distribution model. That is not how for masters of, e.g. the VR bundle are stored but rather generated by a script. For personal use one can omit the INSTALL set and build a binary package directly if more convenient. -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._