search for: bundle

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4314 matches for "bundle".

2006 Jan 09
7
File_column Dynamic directory
I asked this question earlier and did recieve an answer but I am not sure Ifully understood the answer as I am getting all sorts of errors when trying to implement. Basically I want to add a layer to the path for my files. I have the following set up in my model class: file_column :image, :store_dir => :dynamic_dir def dynamic_dir
2006 Feb 09
2
breakpointer error
Hi, I can''t get breakpointer to work on locomotive. Pretty sure it used to work... Any ideas?? Jeroen jeroen$ ruby script/breakpointer /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-max.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/drb/drb.rb:828:in `getaddrinfo'': getaddrinfo: No address associated with nodename (SocketError) from /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-max.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/drb/drb.rb:828:in `o...
2008 May 16
0
attachment_fu and/or rmagick on osx -- weird error
...; 2: <li> 3: <% if defined? repeat %> 4: <a href="javascript:void(0);" Trace of template inclusion: /personal_pages/your_locker_door.html.erb RAILS_ROOT: /Users/philsmy/development/BSG Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace /Applications/Locomotive2/Bundles/rmagickRailsMar2007_i386.locobundle/framework/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/RubyInline-3.6.7/lib/inline.rb:78:in `mkdir'' /Applications/Locomotive2/Bundles/rmagickRailsMar2007_i386.locobundle/framework/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/RubyInline-3.6.7/lib/inline.rb:78:in `rootdir'' /Applications/...
2007 Nov 15
6
Link_to popup divorced from controller?
Here''s my case: Using a link_to popup window to show a related help file of an element on a page. The problem: Window pops up perfectly, but refuses to carryover @instance variables in the controller that I referenced in the link_to command. The tests: - I have the right controller/class, because it renders a specific template, which is what it does. - I have the right template/view,
2005 Dec 15
1
Problem with ActionMailer -- which looks really cool!
Whatever I do to try to connect including trying different ISPs, I get the same errors, here they are: Errno::ECONNREFUSED in Events#send_my_email Connection refused - connect(2) Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-0.14.1-min.bundle/Contents/ Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:83:in `initialize'' /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-0.14.1-min.bundle/Contents/ Resources/ports/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:83:in `new'' /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-0.14.1-min.bundle...
2011 Dec 02
18
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle
Machine Instruction Bundle in LLVM Hi all, There have been quite a bit of discussions about adding machine instruction bundle to support VLIW targets. I have been pondering what the right representation should be and what kind of impact it might have on the LLVM code generator. I believe I have a fairly good plan now and w...
2016 Oct 27
4
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles
I am using machine instruction bundles [1] before register allocation. This appears not to be too common today and I'd really like some input on the intentions and plans of the current system. And would like some input on clean up proposals. [1] I am currently experimenting to use machine instruction bundles to reliably form macro...
2008 Apr 07
3
rsync installation _error exit code1
...g.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating lib/dummy config.status: creating zlib/dummy config.status: creating popt/dummy config.status: creating shconfig config.status: creating config.h config.status: config.h is unchanged rsync 3.0.1 configuration successful # make (Bundled) cc: warning 422: Unknown option "-Wno-unused-parameter" ignored. (Bundled) cc: "lib/pool_alloc.h", line 10: error 1000: Unexpected symbol: "size". (Bundled) cc: "lib/pool_alloc.h", line 10: warning 5: "const" will become a keyword. (Bundled) cc: &...
2016 Oct 28
0
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: > > == BUNDLE instruction / operands == > For many backend passes a bundle can appear as a single unit. However one important tool > here is having an iterator over all operands of this unit. > > The original RFC indicates that to achieve this without changing a big number > of passes an addition...
2012 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle
...veloper to add some optimization passes after the packetizer. Instead, I would add the packetizer as a separate pass. It is true that the packetizer must deal in that case with PHI and COPY nodes that are eliminated by the RA. The packetizer can simple group all PHI and COPY instruction into single bundles consisting of only one instruction. >From my experience a simple packetizer that groups instruction into bundles (like the old IA-64 back-end did) without changing the order of the instructions produces bad code. Instead, a VLIW scheduler that directly outputs bundles produces better code. The...
2012 Jun 06
2
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization
Hi, We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles *before* RA to model certain constraints, e.g. the exposed one by Tzu-Chien a while ago in his thread http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html In order to build bundles, we have added a new bottom-up MIScheduler, right after...
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle
...t is a bit trickier.. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 2:40 PM To: LLVM Dev Subject: [LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle Machine Instruction Bundle in LLVM Hi all, There have been quite a bit of discussions about adding machine instruction bundle to support VLIW targets. I have been pondering what the right representation should be and what kind of impact it might have on the LLVM code generator. I believ...
2016 Oct 28
2
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: >> >> == BUNDLE instruction / operands == >> For many backend passes a bundle can appear as a single unit. However one important tool >> here is having an iterator over all operands of this unit. >> >> The original RFC indicates that to achieve this without changing a big number >> o...
2011 Dec 03
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle
...-- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 2:40 PM > To: LLVM Dev > Subject: [LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle > > Machine Instruction Bundle in LLVM > > Hi all, > > There have been quite a bit of discussions about adding machine instruction bundle to support VLIW targets. I have been pondering what the right representation should be and what kind of impact it might have on the LLVM...
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Instruction Bundle
Evan, I will need to comprehend it better, but one small comment right away. Did we not discuss one more option for bundle implementation - global cycle ID. We would add an unsigned int field to MI definition representing "global scheduling cycle". All MIs with the same global cycle value belong to one group/packet. Zero means unscheduled MI. That is light weight, position independent (means if instruc...
2012 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization
...toklund at 2pi.dk <mailto:stoklund at 2pi.dk>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com <mailto:ivanllopard at gmail.com>> wrote: > We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on > instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles *before* RA to > model certain constraints, e.g. the exposed one by Tzu-Chien a while ago > in his thread > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html The bundle support in the tree should handle con...
2013 Feb 04
2
[LLVMdev] Asserts in bundleWithPred() and bundleWithSucc()
Jakob, > The intention was to identify code that may have been converted from > the old style a little too quickly. I wanted to avoid bugs from a > global s/setIsInsideBundle/bundleWithPred/g search and replace. This is a good intent. Maybe a bit temporal but sound nevertheless. > finalizeBundle is calling 'MIBundleBuilder Bundle(MBB, FirstMI, > LastMI)' which ought to work with pre-bundled instructions. Not exactly. Let me illustrate couple cases he...
2006 Jan 18
15
Anyone got Globalize working???
...ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ''WHERE id = 1'' at line 1: UPDATE products SET WHERE id = 1 from /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-min.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.13.2/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:88:in `log'' from /Applications/Locomotive/Bundles/rails-1.0.0-min.bundle/Contents/Resources/ports/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerec...
2012 Jun 06
0
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization
On Jun 6, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: > We have a new BE for a VLIW-like processor and I'm currently working on > instruction bundles. Ideally, I'd like to have bundles *before* RA to > model certain constraints, e.g. the exposed one by Tzu-Chien a while ago > in his thread > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-September/004798.html The bundle support in the tree should handle constraints like that....
2017 Jun 27
4
Ok with mismatch between dead-markings in BUNDLE and bundled instructions?
...llvm-dev, I've got a regalloc-related question that you might have an opinion or answer about. In our out-of-tree target we've been doing some bundling before register allocation for quite some time now, and last night a new problem popped up. What the fix should be depends on if this bundle is legal or not: BUNDLE %vreg39<imp-def,dead> * %vreg39:hiAcc<def> = mv_ar16_ar16_lo16In32 %vreg37 [...] %vreg39 isn't used after the bundle so the dead-marking in the BUNDLE is correct. However, the def in the actual bundled instruction defining %vreg39 is no...