João Luis Meloni Assirati
2020-Sep-13 22:01 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] Question about battery test / calibration
The UPS I am writing a driver to has the ability to inform that a variation in the battery's capacity has changed, and therefore a test.battery.start.deep or calibration.start has to be performed. Is there a way -- appart from syslog -- for the driver to inform the user/administrator that this maintenance action has to be performed? I would appreciate very much that my previous question if there are any differences in the intended uses of test.battery.start.deep and calibration.start. If there are no distinctions, I would also like to know which one is preferred. Thank you, João Luis. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20200913/a33eba50/attachment.html>
Maybe Matching Threads
- Some questions about NUT driver development
- Question about hardware failures / FSD
- Question about hardware failures / FSD
- [LLVMdev] x86_stdcallcc @<n> mangling vs. '\1' prefix [was: x86_stdcallcc and extra name mangling on Windows]
- [LLVMdev] x86_stdcallcc @<n> mangling vs. '\1' prefix [was: x86_stdcallcc and extra name mangling on Windows]