search for: distinctions

I''m trying to find all the unique bill_number, status records in Bills table. I can do it with a find_by_sql statement like this: @records = Bill.find_by_sql( "select distinct bill_number, status from bills group by bill_number, status;") How would I rewrite it using ''find :all

Hi Can anyone with distinctive ring on their 7960's possibly post how they've got it to work? I understand that the ALERT_INFO variable is involved but using the examples for the variable value from the WiKi I'm just getting an error message from the Asterisk concole. Thanks in advance. P

... Being an R newbie, I can only think of extracting distinct x values with unique, looping over them, extracting matching rows from the original data frame, applying table, and recording the size of table's output alongside the x value being checked. Is there a more elegant way? Thank you. -- View this message in context:

Is it possible to allow distinctive rings work for FXS ports as well? I need a certain FXS extension to ring a distinctive double ring. I modified zapata.conf appropriately for dring1,dring2 and it just Seems to ignore my updates. Do distinctive rings only work for FXO ports? Paul Seniuk -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Paul Seniuk.vcf

Hi Paul, Thanks for your response. Let me actually post more details visualizing my case. Assuming that can help. so the IR before the opt tool is running is: ; Function Attrs: nounwind define i16 @main() #0 !dbg !13 { entry: %retval = alloca i16, align 1 ... } ; Function Attrs: inlinehint nounwind define internal void @delay(i16 %d) #4 !dbg !69 { entry: %d.addr = alloca i16,

I saw https://reviews.llvm.org/rGe17f52d623cc146b7d9bf5a2e02965043508b4c4#949392 "Add a verifier check that rejects non-distinct DISubprogram function" (which has currently be reverted) today which made me wonder why a DISubprogram needs to be distinct? David told me the following and encouraged me to ask in the upstream: > May be historical at this point, I'm not quite sure. (I

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:08 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > > First — thanks for fixing the test for me! I'm a bit curious about the test - any idea how it came to be, if it's invalid? Did we produce such bitcode in the past and don't anymore - what's the rule about backwards compatibility here, then? It seems like any time we regenerate a bitcode

Aha, okay. I had noticed that the column-info hack went away. So the distinct-ness implies the scope implicit in the inlined call, which later on will be turned into the explicit inlined_subroutine entry. That seems… indirect. I have to say, the LangRef page's words about "merge based on content" is not really to the point. It's like saying the purpose of a street-corner

I'm encountering a merge issue whose root cause has to do with "distinct" metadata nodes. I see that distinct-ness is an intentional concept, but the explanation in the LLVM Language Reference is not very enlightening. distinct nodes are useful when nodes shouldn't be merged based on their content. The notion of "merged" metadata is not discussed elsewhere on

Hi Arsen, we are beyond what I understand about how metadata operates. Maybe Adrian or David knows. --paulr From: Arsen Hakobyan [mailto:hakobyan.ars at gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 12:16 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; David Blaikie Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] StripDeadDebugInfo for static inline functions. Just one update: the function causing the segmentation

Hi all, For the R package bujar, the warnings below were generated on CRAN's Windows systems. The package uses some Fortran subroutines. I would appreciate any advice to eliminate the warnings. By the way, similar warnings were generated to some unrelated R packages as well: https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64/imputeTS-00check.html. Thanks in advance. Zhu

Just one update: the function causing the segmentation fault is the following: 359 void DwarfDebug::constructAbstractSubprogramScopeDIE(LexicalScope *Scope) { 360 assert(Scope && Scope->getScopeNode()); 361 assert(Scope->isAbstractScope()); 362 assert(!Scope->getInlinedAt()); 363 364 const MDNode *SP = Scope->getScopeNode(); 365 366

I have an original_at column in my photos table. I''d like to get a list of distinct years that occur in this column, and some of the values are NULL. I see two ways of doing this. The SQLish way: photos = Photo.find :all, :select => ''distinct year(original_at)'' This is efficient in that it utilizes the database to do the filtering, and the code is not too ugly.

Hello - I have a TDM400P with 2 FXO and 2 FXS modules. Feeding the FXS modules are two VOIP lines which are terminated by VOIP adapters and have regular RJ11 wires connecting to the FXS ports. Since the two different VOIP lines have different phone numbers, and I know and can tell asterisk which VOIP line is connected to which FXS port, can I cause a distinctive ring on the extensions if a call

I just wrote an IR Verifier check that catches the following situation: ; RUN: not llvm-as %s -disable-output 2>&1 | FileCheck %s define void @f1() !dbg !4 { unreachable } ; CHECK: DISubprogram attached to more than one function define void @f2() !dbg !4 { unreachable } !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1} !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2) !2

Hi All, I was wondering what the status of distinctive ring support in Asterisk is? I had a google search & read and Mark Spencer wrote some support for it. Is distinctive ring different in every country or is it pretty standard? And for my final question, does the Wildcard FXO card support distinctive ring? Essentially what I'm trying to do is route incoming calls with ring #1 to,

Hi All... Can Asterick detect distinctive ringing on a POTS line and answer with different configurations? Thanks...

Hi R-users, How can I found the number of a distinct values in a data frame (occurrence of distinct values)? The dataframe consists of several thousands integer numbers. Thanks, Rado -- Radoslav Bonk M.S. Dept. of Physical Geography and Geoecology Faculty of Sciences, Comenius University Mlynska Dolina 842 15, Bratislava, SLOVAKIA tel: +421 905 968 127 e-mail: rbonk at host.sk

Hi All, I've recently got a "second" number installed on my PSTN line, trusting the Asterisk distinctive ring detection would work as expected. It appeared to work fine at the start, as the second number generated a different ring pattern to 0,0,0 (in the console) only to realise that almost every phone call to this "second" number generated a different ring pattern.

Thanks Paul, Hi Adrian and David I would really appreciate any comments, thoughts assumptions. If additional information is needed please let me know. Regards, Arsen On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Arsen, we are beyond what I understand about how metadata operates. > Maybe Adrian or David knows. > > --paulr > >