Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Question about battery test / calibration"
2020 Sep 05
1
Some questions about NUT driver development
Hello,
I am developing a new NUT driver for brazilian UPS brand "Ragtech" by
reverse engeneering. I have never been involved in NUT driver development,
so I wish to ask some basic questions. Any help will be much appreciated!
1. Is there a mandatory C code style? I mean, any strong recommendation? If
there are none, I prefer to keep mine.
2. What are the purposes of "instant
2020 Sep 29
5
Question about hardware failures / FSD
Hello,
The UPS I am developing a driver to is able to report several flags for
critical hardware conditions, like overheat, overload, inverter failure,
output short etc. What should be the correct policy of operation when such
a condition occurs? I think that the an UPS in such a condition is not
reliable and therefore a system shutdown should be called. However, the
developer's manual and
2020 Sep 30
0
Question about hardware failures / FSD
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, João Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> The UPS I am developing a driver to is able to report several flags for
> critical hardware conditions, like overheat, overload, inverter failure,
> output short etc. What should be the correct policy of operation when such a
> condition occurs? I think that the an UPS in such a condition is not reliable
> and therefore a
2013 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] x86_stdcallcc @<n> mangling vs. '\1' prefix [was: x86_stdcallcc and extra name mangling on Windows]
The patch looks incorrect. The code just needs to handle \1 properly
and clang extended to add explicit \1 to the names which does not
require mangling.
I do not think that moving whole mangling to clang is a good idea,
because then everyone who uses LLVM to call WinApi functions will need
to mangle by hands.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov
<timurrrr at google.com>
2013 Feb 22
1
[LLVMdev] x86_stdcallcc @<n> mangling vs. '\1' prefix [was: x86_stdcallcc and extra name mangling on Windows]
2013/2/21 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>:
> The patch looks incorrect. The code just needs to handle \1 properly
> and clang extended to add explicit \1 to the names which does not
> require mangling.
I think clang already adds \01 to __stdcall names, so only the LLVM
change is remaining.
> I do not think that moving whole mangling to clang is a good idea,
>
2017 Feb 17
2
nouveau preventing shutdown after suspend-resume
Hello Ilia,
On 17 February 2017 at 11:14, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, João Paulo Rechi Vita
> <jprvita at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm happy to file
>> a bugzilla entry and provide any other needed information or help with
>> testing. Are nouveau bugs tracked on bugs.kernel.org or the fdo
>> bugzilla?
2013 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] x86_stdcallcc @<n> mangling vs. '\1' prefix [was: x86_stdcallcc and extra name mangling on Windows]
Anton, what do you think of David's patch with this test case? OK to
commit that?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <
anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> The patch looks incorrect. The code just needs to handle \1 properly
> and clang extended to add explicit \1 to the names which does not
> require mangling.
>
> I do not think that moving whole
2013 Feb 20
4
[LLVMdev] x86_stdcallcc @<n> mangling vs. '\1' prefix [was: x86_stdcallcc and extra name mangling on Windows]
I don't remember anything other that what I've written in the bug João
has mentioned.
Probably something like this patch
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14410#c6
?
2013/2/20 João Matos <ripzonetriton at gmail.com>:
> I think so. There have been other reports lately related to this being
> wrong.
>
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14410
>
> CC'ing
2006 Nov 04
1
Calibrating the Battery on an MGE Ellipse Premium 1200
My new MGE Ellipse Premium 1200 is now working fine. I've tested
pulling the plug and the computer shuts down properly and comes back
up when I replug. The only strange behaviour is that when I put the
power back on the battery shows as being at 86%. If it was at 86% it
should have lasted longer. Is there any calibration step I can do? The
only commands the ups seems to support are:
$ upscmd
2012 Aug 04
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] GCC 4.7.2 will have Win64 SEH (by default)
+LLVMdev
On Aug 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, João Matos wrote:
> Charles Davis did a lot of work on Win64 SEH support in LLVM, check commits r131652-r132880.
>
> As I haven't tested it yet, what exactly is broken?
It's not finished yet. All the stuff for assembly code that uses Win64 EH is done, but not the code-gen-side stuff (cf. Win64Exception class in CodeGen). I was about to
2006 Sep 07
0
plot image matrix with row/col labels
I'm working with an historical image that may be (one of?) the first
uses of gray-scale shading to show the pattern of values in a
matrix/table, later used by Bertin in his 'reorderable matrix'
and sometimes called a scalogram.
The image is at
http://euclid.psych.yorku.ca/SCS/Gallery/images/Private/scalogram.jpg
The rows refer to the arrondisements of Paris, the cols to various
2013 Dec 10
2
[LLVMdev] Switching to the new MingW ABI
The tool uses Clang to parse the user's C/C++ code to get the calling
conventions from the AST, so they need to match the ones in the compiled
libraries to allow correct interop. If the user libraries were compiled
with GCC 4.6 (which stills seems used by some MinGW distros) then once we
upgrade to the latest Clang we'll start getting thiscall CC instead of the
correct one used pre-4.7 for
2017 Apr 17
0
doubt
This problem, in the computer park there is a domain controller microsoft
without shared printers, I need to use another server with samba shares +
cups, but with authentication in the microsoft active directory.
I try parameters securty = ads (join machine in domain) and user ( cant
read users with nslcd and nsswitch , but only work with ssh and apache.
Topology
1 server microsoft windows (
2002 Mar 20
2
drbd + ext3 + interbase + data lost
Hello All,
Yesterday, one of our customer's cluster(2 box) server goes down after a
I/O error during the backup procedure. When we turn on the cluster
again, the 600M database file have been lost, disapear.
Now, I'm with one of the disks (the other was used to rebuild the
database server) and need to know how can I recover any piece of data
from the disk.
After the crash we mount the
2012 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] MS-style inline assembly
On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:03 PM, João Matos wrote:
> 1. How is clang going to discover the input operands, output operands,
> constraints, and clobbered registers?
>
> The approach you described sounds good to me. Reusing all the work done in the LLVM MC layer seems the right approach.
Glad you agree. We really shouldn't be replicating information in the frontend; this very error
2012 Dec 27
0
[LLVMdev] llvm msil couple questions
In the interests of maintaining a complete thread, forwarding,
(somehow got set to llvm-dev instead of llvmdev)
----
this is awesome!!!
very nice..
I've been reading the code. I have a couple questions, which I should
probably figure out myself, but might as well ask.
With regards to new/delete.
I assume these are being translated into calls to lib-functions?
Is pointer arithmetic and
2020 Sep 29
0
Question about hardware failures / FSD
Hello Daniel!
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:23 PM Daniel F. Dickinson
<cshore at thecshore.com> wrote:
>
> Hello joão,
>
> To get more responses you should plaintext email (standard for open source development mailing lists) instead of HTML mail.
I just can't believe that I was sending HTML e-mail. Thank you very
very much for bringing this to my attention. I hope it is ok now.
2017 Feb 17
0
nouveau preventing shutdown after suspend-resume
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:22 AM, João Paulo Rechi Vita
<jprvita at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Ilia,
>
> On 17 February 2017 at 11:14, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:54 AM, João Paulo Rechi Vita
>> <jprvita at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm happy to file
>>> a bugzilla entry and provide any other
2013 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] x86_stdcallcc @<n> mangling vs. '\1' prefix [was: x86_stdcallcc and extra name mangling on Windows]
I think so. There have been other reports lately related to this being
wrong.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14410
CC'ing Timur since he might know more about this.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:27 PM, David Nadlinger <code at klickverbot.at>wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> >> My question: Is there an easy way
2004 Aug 10
1
centos 3 rpm compatibility
Hello.
I would like to know what kind of RPMs we can use for centos 3, appart of
the common centos 3 repository.
Can we for example take a RedHat 8.0 rpm and install it ?
Or can we for sure take an src.rpm and install it this way ?
Thanks for any advice,
Daniel