search for: misspoke

Hi Andrey, Sorry, I definitely misspoke when I said it was likely for OpenMP stuff to end up in this new project. I meant to say that it was possible in the long run, but there are no plans for that now. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jas...

...re to the normal flac :) > > > Stefan Thanks for the suggestion - I'm reading the ffmpeg changelog and feature list right now, and it appears that it only supports flac decoding not encoding and decoding - is this because the documentation is out of sync with the code? Also, sorry, I misspoke - I'm looking to add OggFLAC stream capability not plain FLAC stream capability, though I have seen reports of Winamp and several other clients choking on Ogg container streams containing anything but Vorbis due to naive type handling. Ken Stein @ kastein@wpi.edu

Nope, it generates an error, not a warning-as-error. (LLVM generates a whole host of warnings when run through the VStudio STL implementation). I misspoke earlier about VStudio ignoring noreturn. I investigated further and found that the implementation of abort in VStudio 2k5 is not tagged noreturn, hence the error. Thanks, Chuck. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu on behalf of me22 Sent: Thu 5/31/2007 7:11 PM To: LL...

...h but not like you, my goal is not to belittle his work on the contrary I like what you have echo and will continue doing. In the specific message that I do not also has worked for me. I assure you I have tried several times and using the manuals that come on the wiki but I could not solve, maybe I misspoke. You could tell me where to start or whether I mean the part because it does not update the DNS via DHCP with the reverse zone. My apologies to you and the team Leonidch ---------------------------- Mensaje original ---------------------------- Asunto: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 more complete De: &...

...checked Yast to make sure I had at least 0.1.8 version for libusb. I saw this (attached photo). Is it then actually using ?compat instead of the ?real? libusb? And is that a problem? > > You're right, both the -compat and real libusb packages will use the same libusb-0.1.so* name. I misspoke. The "real libusb" (0.1) and libusb-compat will both get linked with "-lusb". The package management system is free to implement that with symlinks to the actual files. The confusing part is that openSUSE seems to be adopting the 0.1.1x numbering scheme for libusb-compat so th...

...nders here. Maybe >> someone will follow up with whether the JIT uses stub functions >> which would enable dynamic relinking If not, it would be a >> straightforward, if platform-specific, feature to add. > > I don't use proxy or stub functions, I relink them... I misspoke. See here: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1JIT.html#a7 Relinking the function as you describe is risky in the case that the address of the function has been taken. LLVM's present approach is general. — Gordon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed.....

.../index. <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Testing_Kerberos> > php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Testing_Kerberos <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Testing_Kerberos> I misspoke on that one. Indeed, the information is there but when I tried it I was greeted with a washlist of errors and no idea how to solve it. At that point I was out of luck(and I was not the only one as I have found others on the internet with the same issue). > > Maybe I sound a bit angry, but...

...I'd like to improve > > this at some point. > > I forgot to add: > - Altivec support currently seems broken (there are some tests with > altivec intrinsics in the test suite, these all fail to compile) > - There is no VSX support. Roman pointed out to me that I misspoke. LLVM only generates PIC on Darwin, not for ELF. What does work on PPC64 is dynamic linking (meaning that it will correctly put nop after the calls so that the linker can do its thing). To support dynamic linking on PPC32 we'd need to explicitly add other things (stubs?) and that is not impleme...

...tivated enough to fix the problems, not that they intentionally leave > a problem open:) I took some time to look at the problem and conclude > that clang should do nothing on this. Actually, with the clang behavior, > you can discard "Unused" if you use LLD. Read on. Sorry if I misspoke, I was not suggesting that the bug was known and voluntary not fixed by laziness ;-). I am sure there is a valid reason and wanted to know about it. Just like you explained, it appears that LLVM rely on LLD to do that instead of enforcing it in the middle-end which is a different approach to GCC....

We are running a benchmark that does single threaded 512 KB writes to a LUN on a CLARiiON storage array. The dual Xeon host (Dell 2650) with 4 GB of memory runs RHEL 4U3 We measured the write bandwidth for writes to the block device corresponding to the lun (e.g. /dev/sdb), a file in an ext2 filesystem and to a file in an ext3 file system. Write b/w for 512 KB writes Block device 312 MBps Ext2

...Reserve as in you don't allow anything to be allocated to it just in the uncommon case you have to spill a condition reg to a stack slot you cannot write to with a 16-bit offset? Speaking as a person who has implemented register allocators, that is bad! > Roman pointed out to me that I misspoke. LLVM only generates PIC on > Darwin, not for ELF. What does work on PPC64 is dynamic linking > (meaning that it will correctly put nop after the calls so that the > linker can do its thing). To support dynamic linking on PPC32 we'd need > to explicitly add other things (stubs?) and...

...my goal is not to belittle his work on the > contrary I like what you have echo and will continue doing. In the > specific message that I do not also has worked for me. > I assure you I have tried several times and using the manuals that come on > the wiki but I could not solve, maybe I misspoke. > You could tell me where to start or whether I mean the part because it > does not update the DNS via DHCP with the reverse zone. > > My apologies to you and the team > Leonidch > > > ---------------------------- Mensaje original ---------------------------- > Asunto: R...

...configuration. I don't know of any UEFI overview/tutorial >> without Googling for one. >> > > Actually, for an external NIC there is still an option ROM. The UEFI > network stack is referred to as "PXE" even though it is nothing like the > BIOS PXE stack. I misspoke. I meant there's no option ROM application executed from the option ROM on the NIC like BIOS. The UEFI system should be loading a NIC driver from the option ROM, if prepared properly with a driver for the proper architecture. >>>> would talk only TFTP, doesn't syslinux.efi by...

...onsistent with > the UNIX permisssion of not allowing searching), but the very fact > that the window opens and the directory APPEARS empty is confusing > some folks. Wouldn't it be better if you got a permission denied > message when you opened the dir in the first place? Hmmn: I misspoke, before. It is an artifact of Unix/Windows permissions, but it seems bizarre that Samba doesn't fail in the cd-equivalent... OOK! Found it. Any change-directory operation is done as a lazy evaluation, just like Unix. Therefor, the cd should fail if and only if there is no execute on...

Hi folks, I'm trying to use sssd under CentOS 6.3 to query user/group information from samba 4.0.1. I have the posix attributes set on my user/group objects, however I don't seem to be able to query them unless I use the administrator account. With anonymous quires enabled, I'm not able to see anything below my basedn, and with "acl:read=false" set in smb.conf the

I would like deliver to reject certain users. Since supposedly deliver only uses userdb, not passwd, I can't use deny=yes for that. Or does userdb support deny=yes? Yes, I should rather reject them right in the MTA, but that currently takes too long to implement. Or how to reject gast* in postfix using nss authentication?

Are there any plans to support flac streams with ices (and therefore with libshout as a dependency) currently? If there aren't, anyone have pointers as to where I should start changing things to add it? I've read one of oddsock's mailing list postings mentioning that some format-specific timing issues would need to be resolved as well as some other hangups, but I'm still a bit

On 31/05/07, Chuck Rose III <cfr at adobe.com> wrote: > Here are the two problem areas: > > RegisterInfoEmitter.cpp > > // Emit the subregister + index mapping function based on the > information > // calculated above. > OS << "unsigned " << ClassName > << "::getSubReg(unsigned RegNo, unsigned Index) const {\n" >

Would it be parallel-libs/libomptarget/ or parallel-libs/omp/libomptarget/ To me the second way seems better because it seems likely that other OpenMP stuff could end up in there in the long run. Once we decide on which code to share, I think we will end up with new directories at the top level for those common components. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM C Bergström <cbergstrom at

...checked Yast to make sure I had at least 0.1.8 version for libusb. I saw this (attached photo). Is it then actually using ?compat instead of the ?real? libusb? And is that a problem? > > You're right, both the -compat and real libusb packages will use the same libusb-0.1.so* name. I misspoke. The "real libusb" (0.1) and libusb-compat will both get linked with "-lusb". The package management system is free to implement that with symlinks to the actual files. The confusing part is that openSUSE seems to be adopting the 0.1.1x numbering scheme for libusb-compat so th...