search for: andreybokhanko

...rey On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > So you plan on switching and enabling the openmp library defaults as > well as changing the openmp library name at the same time? > Jack > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 PM, andreybokhanko > <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: >> It will come on next week. >> >> I'd like to give a chance to everyone to raise their objections first. >> >> Yours, >> Andrey >> >>> 8 мая 2015 г., в 18:30, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.li...

...1:22, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> написал(а): > > Andrey, > Any idea when the patch to enable openmp as the default for > -fopenmp will be posted to cfe-commits? > Jack > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Andrey Bokhanko > <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: >> No, just changing defaults -- subject to code reviewers approval. >> >> As I said before, I prefer to leave library naming to library pros. >> >> Andrey >> >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jack Howarth >> <...

...days first before using follow on > patches to switch the library name to llomp or whatever. I would be > nice to no longer have to feed clang "-fopenmp=libiomp5 -Xclang > -fopenmp=libiomp5". > Jack > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Andrey Bokhanko > <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >>> Congratulations! Would you like to add a blurb to the release notes >>> for the next release? >> >> Sure! Will do. >> >> Yours, >&gt...

...a problem of this patch, this a problem of your configuration. This patch uses standard clang machinery for locating libiomp5 library. Best regards, Alexey Bataev ============= Software Engineer Intel Compiler Team 13.05.2015 15:59, Jack Howarth пишет: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:58 PM, <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: >> Jack, >> >> Alexey [Bataev] promised to send it for review in a day or two. Then it should be approved by code reviewers, which might take some time. >> >> andrey > Andrey, > There is one issue with the proposed patch at > ht...

Hi Andrey, Sorry, I definitely misspoke when I said it was likely for OpenMP stuff to end up in this new project. I meant to say that it was possible in the long run, but there are no plans for that now. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev < > openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> it seems likely that other OpenMP stuff could end up in there in the long >> run. >> > > Huh? What makes you think so? > &...

Andrey, Are you still working on this? Thanks again, Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > To: "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:19:32 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] OpenMP Representation in LLVM IR > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>...

...2012 at 11:05 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Andrey, > > Are you still working on this? > > Thanks again, > Hal > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> To: "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> >> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:19:32 AM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] OpenMP Representation in LLVM IR >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Andrey Bokhanko" <and...

Hal, > 1 июня 2016 г., в 14:22, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> написал(а): > I agree that the 'openmp' runtime project logically fits within the purview of a 'parallel' project. We may even want to move it there eventually. We might also want it to remain separate while the project uses its own coding conventions (which are different from LLVM's coding conventions

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:52 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> All, >> >> I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with libiomp as >> the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp. >> > > Just for the record, I'm really excited to see this. =] > >...

Hola Chandler, On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Chandler Carruth via Openmp-dev < openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It seems like if the OpenMP folks want to add a liboffload plugin to > StreamExecutor, that would be an awesome additional platform, but I don't > see why we need to force the coupling here. > > Let me give you a reason: while user-facing sides of

...eople/a/alexe > - phone: 914-945-1812 (work) 914-312-3618 (cell) > > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Jason Henline via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent by: "Openmp-dev" <openmp-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> > To: Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>, Chandler Carruth < > chandlerc at google.com> > Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, > "openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org" <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: Re: [Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC:...

...do you think is the problem? Test: #define SIZE 8 void bar(int *A, int* B,int K) { #pragma clang loop vectorize(enable) vectorize_width(2) unroll_count(8) for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; ++i) A[i] += B[i] + K; } Thanks, Xiaochu On Aug 12, 2016 4:06 AM, "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xiaochu, > > Clang uses -O0 by default, that doesn't run any optimizations. Try > supplying -O1 or higher. > > Yours, > Andrey > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Xiaochu Liu via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wro...

...ne: 914-945-1812 (work) 914-312-3618 (cell) >> >> >> ----- Original message ----- >> From: Jason Henline via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Sent by: "Openmp-dev" <openmp-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> >> To: Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>, Chandler Carruth < >> chandlerc at google.com> >> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, >> "openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org" <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Subject: Re: [Openmp-dev]...

...UDA platform). > > I wrote up this doc in response to a lot of good questions I am getting > about the details of how StreamExecutor might work with the code OpenMP > already has in place. > > Best Regards, > -Jason > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:28 PM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hola Chandler, >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Chandler Carruth via Openmp-dev < >> openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> It seems like if the OpenMP folks want to add a liboffload plugin to >>>...

....llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "openmp-dev" >> <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com>, "Carlo Bertolli" <cbertol at us.ibm.com>, >> "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 6:46:57 AM >> Subject: Re: [Openmp-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support >> libraries >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>...

...6 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> *To: *"Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> *Cc: *"Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>, "llvm-dev" < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:02:57 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Interprocedural MIR-level outlining pass >> >> (and in particular, the definition of equivalence used by co...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 3:15:54 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] OpenMP Representation in LLVM IR > > Hal, > > > While I think that it will be relatively ea...

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Congratulations! Would you like to add a blurb to the release notes > for the next release? Sure! Will do. Yours, Andrey

On 29 July 2016 at 12:09, Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: > What if a new back-end ticks all the right boxes but simply not being > reviewed by established members of the community? This case is clear. The code only goes in after proper review. Interests vary from case to case, and normally, pinging on the mailing list and...

On 29 July 2016 at 12:16, Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: > 1) Leave the wording as is, and make Lanai an official back-end no earlier > than Sep 28th. I don't want to *have* to do that just because we introduced a policy after the Lanai back-end started the process... And making Lanai official just before the policy go...