llvm dev - Sep 2013 - [LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options

On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at
codeaurora.org>wrote:
>
>> Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the
>> fsanitize options ?
>>
>> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too.
>>
> We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've not been
able
> to add these bots easily due to infrastructure issues.
Thanks for the info Chandler. I would like to add the extra fsanitize 
configs to the lld buildbot to detect problems early.

There have been a bunch of temporary string issues, which would have 
been easily caught by the sanitizer tools.

Thanks

Shankar Easwaran

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the
Linux Foundation

FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot (
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that
does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan.
Probably we can add a couple of steps that would checkout lld and run
check-lld in ASan-ified/MSan-ified build trees.


On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at
codeaurora.org>wrote:
> On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at
codeaurora.org
>> >**wrote:
>>
>>  Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the
>>> fsanitize options ?
>>>
>>> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too.
>>>
>>>  We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've
not been
>> able
>> to add these bots easily due to infrastructure issues.
>>
> Thanks for the info Chandler. I would like to add the extra fsanitize
> configs to the lld buildbot to detect problems early.
>
> There have been a bunch of temporary string issues, which would have been
> easily caught by the sanitizer tools.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Shankar Easwaran
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted
> by the Linux Foundation
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/**mailman/listinfo/llvmdev<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
>


-- 
Alexey Samsonov, MSK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130910/e244ce3a/attachment.html>

Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11:

In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19:
In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28:
In file included from
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6:
error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka
'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >')
          : __d(__t.time_since_epoch())

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>
wrote:
> FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot
> (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that
> does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan.
> Probably we can add a couple of steps that would checkout lld and run
> check-lld in ASan-ified/MSan-ified build trees.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at
codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran
>>> <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with
the
>>>> fsanitize options ?
>>>>
>>>> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too.
>>>>
>>> We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've not
been able
>>> to add these bots easily due to infrastructure issues.
>>
>> Thanks for the info Chandler. I would like to add the extra fsanitize
>> configs to the lld buildbot to detect problems early.
>>
>> There have been a bunch of temporary string issues, which would have
been
>> easily caught by the sanitizer tools.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Shankar Easwaran
>>
>> --
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted
>> by the Linux Foundation
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alexey Samsonov, MSK
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>