search for: time_since_epoch

...int; template <class Duration> inline std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock, Duration> file_clock::to_sys(const std::chrono::time_point<file_clock, Duration>& t) noexcept { using namespace date; return sys_time<Duration>{t.time_since_epoch()} + (sys_days{2174_y/1/1} - sys_days{1970_y/1/1}); } template <class Duration> inline std::chrono::time_point<file_clock, Duration> file_clock::from_sys(const std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock, Duration>& t...

...../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >') : __d(__t.time_since_epoch()) On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot > (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that > does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan. >...

...u/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/thread:38: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >') : __d(__t.time_since_epoch()) ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:106:42: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio&lt...

Hi All, I recently committed <filesystem> to trunk. I wanted to bring attention to some quirks it currently has. First, it's been put in a separate library, libc++fs, for now. Users are responsible for linking the library when they use filesystem. Second, it should still not be considered ABI stable. Vendors should be aware of this before shipping it. Hopefully all the standard and

...++/4.6/condition_variable:38: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6: > error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka > 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >') > : __d(__t.time_since_epoch()) > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: >> FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot >> (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that >> does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests u...

...clude/c++/4.6/thread:38: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6: > error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka > 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >') > : __d(__t.time_since_epoch()) > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:106:42: > note: in instantiation of function template specialization > 'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock, > std::chrono::durati...

FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot ( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan. Probably we can add a couple of steps that would checkout lld and run check-lld in ASan-ified/MSan-ified build trees. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:

On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am > running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both > cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++. > I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a > Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for

Hi, I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++. I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for exploring clang. I was able to successfully build clang on my ubuntu but

On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > >> Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the >> fsanitize options ? >> >> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too. >> > We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've not been