search for: sectionchunks

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sectionchunks".

2013 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11: In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19: In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6: error: no matching constructor for initi...
2013 Sep 12
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
...you add the step to checkout lld and build and run the unittests then ? Thanks Shankar Easwaran On 9/10/2013 4:59 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote: > Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11: > > In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19: > In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28: > In file included from > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6: > error: no match...
2013 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot ( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan. Probably we can add a couple of steps that would checkout lld and run check-lld in ASan-ified/MSan-ified build trees. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
2013 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > >> Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the >> fsanitize options ? >> >> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too. >> > We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've not been