Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "sectionchunks".
2013 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11:
In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19:
In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28:
In file included from
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6:
error: no matching constructor for initi...
2013 Sep 12
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
...you add the step to checkout lld and build and run the unittests then ?
Thanks
Shankar Easwaran
On 9/10/2013 4:59 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
> Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11:
>
> In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19:
> In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28:
> In file included from
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6:
> error: no match...
2013 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot (
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that
does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan.
Probably we can add a couple of steps that would checkout lld and run
check-lld in ASan-ified/MSan-ified build trees.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
2013 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
>
>> Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the
>> fsanitize options ?
>>
>> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too.
>>
> We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've not been