Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "condition_variable".
2013 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
...with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11:
In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19:
In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28:
In file included from
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6:
error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka
'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >')
: __d(__t.time_since_epoch())
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1...
2013 Oct 16
3
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
...error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka
'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >')
: __d(__t.time_since_epoch())
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:106:42:
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock,
std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >
>::time_point<std::chrono::duration<long,
std::ratio<1, 1000000000> > >'...
2013 Sep 12
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
...got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11:
>
> In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19:
> In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28:
> In file included from
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38:
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6:
> error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka
> 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >')
> : __d(__t.time_since_epoch())
>...
2017 Jun 05
3
libc++ failed to link against musl
...CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/algorithm.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib/CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/any.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib/CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/bind.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib/CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/chrono.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib/CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/condition_variable.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib/CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/debug.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib/CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/exception.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib/CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/functional.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib/CMakeFiles/cxx_objects.dir/__/src/future.cpp.o projects/libcxx/lib...
2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
...onstructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka
> 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >')
> : __d(__t.time_since_epoch())
> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:106:42:
> note: in instantiation of function template specialization
> 'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock,
> std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >
> >::time_point<std::chrono::duration<long,
> std::ratio<1, 100...
2014 Jun 20
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Replace the Execution Engine's mutex with std::recursive_mutex
...whole "mutex" and "shared_mutex" files are #ifdef
>>> _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS so if no _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS there are no mutexes
>>> and no call_once. thread lives in "thread" which is also #ifdef
>>> _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS.
>>> "condition_variable" and "future" are the same.
>>>
>>> I have tested gcc 4.8.2 predefines and _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS isn't
>>> there nor it is defined anywhere with the win32 version. I have also
>>> compiled a small test and indeed it failed with
>>>
>...
2014 Jun 20
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Replace the Execution Engine's mutex with std::recursive_mutex
...t gmail.com> wrote:
> The whole "mutex" and "shared_mutex" files are #ifdef
> _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS so if no _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS there are no mutexes
> and no call_once. thread lives in "thread" which is also #ifdef
> _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS.
> "condition_variable" and "future" are the same.
>
> I have tested gcc 4.8.2 predefines and _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS isn't there
> nor it is defined anywhere with the win32 version. I have also compiled a
> small test and indeed it failed with
>
> a.cpp:4:3: error: 'mutex' is...
2014 Jun 20
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Replace the Execution Engine's mutex with std::recursive_mutex
It sounds like this version of libstdc++ doesn't support
std::recursive_mutex from C++11. This is really unfortunate, because we
were hoping that moving to C++11 would allow us to use standard, portable
threading primitives.
Does this version of MinGW have any C++11 threading support? Is it just
recursive_mutex that is missing, or do we have to avoid std::mutex,
std::call_once, etc? lld
2013 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot (
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that
does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan.
Probably we can add a couple of steps that would checkout lld and run
check-lld in ASan-ified/MSan-ified build trees.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
2013 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am
> running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both
> cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++.
> I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a
> Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for
2013 Oct 15
2
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
Hi,
I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am
running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both
cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++.
I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a
Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for exploring clang.
I was able to successfully build clang on my ubuntu but
2013 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
>
>> Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the
>> fsanitize options ?
>>
>> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too.
>>
> We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've not been
2014 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] Can libc++ build for arm cross compiler?
...ng.cpp.o
> [ 84%] [ 88%] Building CXX object
> lib/CMakeFiles/cxx.dir/__/src/random.cpp.o
> Building CXX object lib/CMakeFiles/cxx.dir/__/src/new.cpp.o
> [ 92%] Building CXX object lib/CMakeFiles/cxx.dir/__/src/ios.cpp.o
> [ 96%] Building CXX object
> lib/CMakeFiles/cxx.dir/__/src/condition_variable.cpp.o
> [100%] Building CXX object lib/CMakeFiles/cxx.dir/__/src/system_error.cpp.o
> Linking CXX shared library libc++.so
> clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-nostdinc++'
> [100%] Built target cxx
> [100%] Built target cxx
> Install the project...
>...
2014 Oct 03
3
[LLVMdev] Can libc++ build for arm cross compiler?
On 10/3/14 10:16 AM, Dan Albert wrote:
>>
>> I try to build libc++ and libc++abi for host x86_64(linux) and target
>> arm(linux) but fail.
>>
>
> Failing in what way? If this isn't working out of the box, we've done
> something wrong.
Yeah, it would help to know more specifics about where you're getting stuck.
>
> jroelofs might know more...
For