Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9088 matches for "enhances".
Did you mean:
enhanced
2006 Dec 07
2
Enhances, require() and quality control
Hello!
I am working on a package where Enhances field seems to be a plausible
option. When I add package, say coda, to this field, I get the following
warning with recent R-devel:
----
* checking for working latex ... OK
* using log directory '/home/ggorjan/programs/R/devel/test.Rcheck'
* using R version 2.5.0 Under development (unstab...
2016 Jul 19
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
Hi Elena,
> On Jul 19, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I made new patches for most of changes with llvm-commits subscriber. But two patches were updated, because there are a lot of comments (patch for CHECK-WORD and patch for templates pattern). Will it be ok?
IMO it's fine to keep some of the original
2020 Aug 29
3
TableGen enhancements
Now that I've learned my way around TableGen just a bit, I'd like to solicit
suggestions for improving and enhancing it.
Perhaps there are some lexical changes that could improve readability of .td
files (e.g., I'm planning to enhance the lexer to allow an apostrophe as a
digit group separator in integers, a la C++).
Perhaps there are some syntactic enhancements that would make .td
2010 Jun 25
2
extlinux boot failer
Hi all :
my /dev/sda2 is ext3 format filesystem, the os moblin is installed in
/dev/sda2 which is root partition, the bootloader is grub, now i want to
change the bootloader to extlinux, but i came across some trouble, so i did
some steps as following:
1. rpm -ivh syslinux-extlinux*.rpm
2. extlinux -i /boot/extlinux
3. i edit extlinux.conf , and put it in /boot/extlinux/, there is
2016 Aug 31
6
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 24, 2016, at 2:04 AM, Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I
2016 Sep 01
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
I wanted to start making some change. But I thought and I don't understand why it's necessary to add @.
// RUN: FileCheck %s
// CHECK-DEFINE-PATERN: register(n): {{[a-z]+}}n
// CHECK: %[[register("1")]]
// CHECK-SAME: %[[register("2")]]
// CHECK: %[[register("1")]]
// CHECK-SAME: %[[register("2")]]
This example will be equivalent to
// RUN:
2016 Aug 24
9
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
Hi all,
Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some doubts about syntax of some features and changes in patches and it'll be great to know more opinions.
1. FileCheck Enhancement - CHECK-WORD (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353)
I replace
2016 Sep 05
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
Ok, when I change syntax I will load new patch.
Thanks,
Elena.
-----Original Message-----
From: vsk at apple.com [mailto:vsk at apple.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:38 PM
To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com>
Cc: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
It is necessary to be
2006 Feb 16
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 12, Issue 8
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2016 Sep 01
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
Yes, I now understand what you suggested.
> CHECK-DEFINE-PATTERN: car(make, model, year): {{Found a }} make model {{, from }} year
But I think that in pattern I should show that I use parameter. I thought that patterns can also be simple strings. All strings should be regexs in pattern and parameters can't be used in pattern in your example. But I want to use parameters in regexs. For
2003 Jul 24
1
voicemail enhancements
Brad's recent list of enhancements look good, but I haven't looked
at the code yet. If the code looks good, I hope it will be committed
to the project CVS.
Here's a partial list of enhancements that I would like to see in
Comedian Mail. I am probably interested in helping to fund the
enhancement of Asterisk voicemail. Is anyone else interested?
-Address message to multiple
2016 Apr 23
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 12
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2009 Dec 30
9
Oracle adapter problem? How to fix this?
Hi,
My setup is:
Ruby 1.8.6
Rails 2.3.5
activerecord-oracle-adapter (1.0.0.9250)
I upgraded Rails and the adapter recently and I just went through hell
trying to find a problem while inserting a record in a table.
Rails was giving me this error:
OCIError (ORA-02289: sequence does not exist):
stmt.c:539:in oci8lib.so
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/oci8.rb:753:in `exec''
2005 Jun 28
1
enhanced multidimensional scaling?
Dear R list
Would anyone be able to tell me whether it is possible to do "enhanced
multidimensional scaling" (enhanced MDS) in R? In other words, something that
goes beyond "cmdscale" by iteratively improving the fit between observed
dissimilarities and inter-object distances, using the KYST algorithm
(Kruskal, 1964).
I have found several implementations of non-metric MDS
2014 Apr 25
1
Perf enhancements in Samba4.1 related to SMB2.1 / SMB3.0 protocol
Hi Everyone,
My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements (SMB2.1 / SMB3.0).
My experimental samba server hardware is running 4.1 version. Want to
improve robocopy WRITE throughput from a two samba client machines
(win7 or win8 or server2012 x86 servers).
Someone please advice me how can I use SMB2.1 or SMB3.0 capabilities
to improve WRITE throughput. I tried samba4.1
2005 Nov 17
4
[Bug 1119] Enhancement request for raising minimum acceptable key length.
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1119
Summary: Enhancement request for raising minimum acceptable key
length.
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.2p1
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.rsasecurity.com/press_release.asp?doc_id=488&
id=1034
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
2019 Jun 25
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 172, Issue 5
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2005 Nov 30
1
CEEA:2005-1130-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 horde - enhancement update (Extras Only)
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2005:1130-1
CentOS 4 x86_64 Horde - Enhancement Update (Extras Only)
We are pleased to add the Horde Application Framework as well as the
following horde projects to the CentOS extras repository:
horde
imp-h3
ingo-h3
kronolith-h3
mnemo-h3
nag-h3
gollem-h3
turba-h3
Horde is an full featured webmail system for your server, please see
this link for details:
2005 Nov 30
1
CEEA:2005-1130-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 horde - enhancement update (Extras Only)
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2005:1130-1
CentOS 4 x86_64 Horde - Enhancement Update (Extras Only)
We are pleased to add the Horde Application Framework as well as the
following horde projects to the CentOS extras repository:
horde
imp-h3
ingo-h3
kronolith-h3
mnemo-h3
nag-h3
gollem-h3
turba-h3
Horde is an full featured webmail system for your server, please see
this link for details: