search for: transforms

Hi, A number of transforms are actually independent, so here's a partial fix. I updated the dependencies in a cluster of transforms: LowerSwitch, Mem2Reg, LowerSelect, LowerAllocations, UnifyFunctionExitNodes. The patch has been tested, but not extensively. PassManager doesn't complain, and the result of a test pass...

...sInstrumentation > rather than PassInstrumentationAnalysis). Ok. The way I envision this working from a user standpoint is -opt-bisect-limit <n> would mean "n applications of code transformation." where "code transformation" could mean an entire pass run or individual transforms within a pass. Each pass would decide what it supports. >> This kind of interface also encourages good pass design like doing all >> the analysis for a transformation before actually doing the >> transformation. Some passes mix analysis with transformation and those >> a...

...reateTextField ("t3", 2, 50, 25, 300, 300); + +t2.border = true; +t3.background = true; +t3.backgroundColor = 0x0000AA; commit 7b5224e080b19eb0c2c62c0d1bb1244cdb6e26b6 Author: Pekka Lampila <pekka.lampila at iki.fi> Date: Thu Nov 1 23:11:11 2007 +0200 Don't use alpha from transforms for TextField's border or background color diff --git a/libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c b/libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c index 2780b7e..979580e 100644 --- a/libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c +++ b/libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c @@ -593,7 +593,8 @@ swfdec_text_field_movie_render...

...ssing this is due to it being disabled by Nadav and when we get the cost model right it'll go back to passing. Maybe we should mark them as supported only by platforms that implement the cost model? ******************** Testing Time: 521.68s ******************** Failing Tests (20): LLVM :: Transforms/LoopVectorize/12-12-11-if-conv.ll LLVM :: Transforms/LoopVectorize/2012-10-22-isconsec.ll LLVM :: Transforms/LoopVectorize/calloc.ll LLVM :: Transforms/LoopVectorize/cast-induction.ll LLVM :: Transforms/LoopVectorize/cpp-new-array.ll LLVM :: Transforms/LoopVectorize/flags.ll...

...b/VMCore/AutoUpgrade.cpp U lib/VMCore/Function.cpp U lib/VMCore/Module.cpp U lib/VMCore/Core.cpp U lib/VMCore/BasicBlock.cpp U lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y U lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.cpp.cvs U lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.h.cvs U lib/AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y.cvs U lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerInvoke.cpp U lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp U lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractor.cpp U lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneModule.cpp U lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp U lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp U lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerSwitch.cpp U lib/Transforms/...

...t; + > > + </File> > + <File > RelativePath="..\..\lib\Analysis > \LoadValueNumbering.cpp" >> > </File> > Index: win32/Transforms/Transforms.vcproj > =================================================================== > --- win32/Transforms/Transforms.vcproj (revision 51223) > +++ win32/Transforms/Transforms.vcproj (working copy) > @@ -396,10 +396,6 @@ >> > </File> &...

Dear all, I'm working on a simple code transformation problem that can be described as below: for a C++ loop: *for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {* * a = M[i] + b;* * }* I want to transform it to: *int A[4]; * * for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {* * A[0] = M[i] + b;* * A[1] = M[i] + b;* * A[2] = M[i] + b;* * A[3] = M[i] + b;* *

Hi everyone, I'm using the metafor package to meta-analyze a set of proportions. This is working really well for the raw proportions, but is there a way to back-transform the arcsine transformed proportions in the rma or forest functions with the atransf option? The estimates and CIs for the transformed proportions need to be back-transformed to be the sin of the estimate squared.

attached is the diff of vcprojs that need to be changed to fix the VS build as of revision: 51224. I don't know if this catches all the missing bits, but this does build all the way through. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: msvs.patch URL:

Duncan Sands <baldrick <at> free.fr> writes: > > > I would be happy if you give me an insight into what could have caused the > > difference. > > No idea. Maybe you forgot to turn optimizations on when compiling? Otherwise > you are going to have to send in your programs along with an explanation of how > you compiled them exactly (exact sequence of

Am Mi., 2. Okt. 2019 um 07:08 Uhr schrieb Florian Hahn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > The other thing is that with the patch behaviour is slightly changed and we could get a diagnostic we didn't get before: > > warning: loop not vectorized: the optimizer was unable to > perform the requested transformation; the transformation might be disabled or >

There are many people complaining that tablet PCs perform not so satisfactory when they are used to play videos. Actually, at first, tablet PC is developed as a mobile small PC that offers more convenient experience for being taken outside. So, it is not a professional media player that can fit all your playing requirements. And we should figure out that tablet PCs can playback most of videos

Hello Tomas, I'm a little bit new here too, but I guess I could try to help you. First, let me see if I get your project straight: you are writing a tool that should (let's say) help students to identify what does a loop seems like after a chosen transformation. Is that the case? If so, your first objective would be isolating a loop transformation and avoid other transformations to mess

Hi everyone! I would like to create a tool which would "simulate" several loop transformations. It should serve as a part of my bachelor thesis. Typical usage of that tool would be this: Mark a loop in a source (probably C/C++) file and specify desired transformation in a predefined way (for example a special comment or something). -> Run the tool on that "crafted"

Hi All, I've been successfully using the with function for analyses and the transform function for multiple transformations. Then I thought, why not use "with" for both? I ran into problems & couldn't figure them out from help files or books. So I created a simplified version of what I'm doing: rm( list=ls() ) x1<-c(1,3,3) x2<-c(3,2,1) x3<-c(2,5,2)

I checked out llvm from cvs & llvm-gcc from svn last night and again tonight. Each time they compiled and installed fine. After installing them, I recompiled compiler transforms I had written for opt. opt seems to load the my transform libraries fine, but it complains: opt: Unknown command line argument '-mytransform' whenever I try to specify one of my transforms on the opt command line. I checked the names of the transforms and they are correct. In addit...

Am Mi., 2. Okt. 2019 um 15:56 Uhr schrieb Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > > It's done by the WarnMissedTransformation and just looks for > > transformation metadata that is still in the IR after all passes that > > should have transformed them have ran. That is, it does not know why > > it is still there -- it could be because the LoopVectorize pass is not

Hi, Are there some built-in LLVM transformation pass, or written library code that transforms LLVM::SwitchInst into if-condition statements (LLVM:: BranchInst)? The purpose of the transformation is that we have a legacy program analyzer that includes an LLVM pass manipulating if-condition statements. Statements of LLVM::SwithchInst should have been handled in the same manner but was not do...

...ocus on the findings that I'm able to do before the deadline and keep some buffer for things that I may find later as identifying all the existing ways for code motion in loop transformations is a big portion of the proposed project. 1. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeMoverUtils.cpp 2. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopFuse.cpp 3. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp 4. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp#L35...

Thanks Weiren! My goal is to transform the code automatically by doing some code analysis, instead of rewriting it manually. To do this source level auto transformation, do you have any suggestions on what tool to use? Thanks again!! On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 04:25 陳韋任 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 2018-01-15 9:36 GMT+08:00 Linchuan Chen via llvm-dev <