Hi all, I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. I basically need the following: - firewall - nat - VPN - bandwidth limiting / monitoring - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware - file & printer sharing - RAID support - if possible fail-over / high availability support. I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer to use 5. Any recommendations? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers
Victor Padro
2009-Apr-15 15:07 UTC
[CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support > - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > > I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works > for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer > to use 5. > > Any recommendations? > > -- > > Kind Regards > Rudi Ahlers > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >Pfsense(FreeBSD based) can be an alternative, although it doesn't support email/groupware out of the box...but it doesn't mean that it can't be done. http://www.pfsense.org I've been running it on a Dell Optiplex PIII for almost 2 years without any issue using NAT, Port Fowarding, Dual WAN(Cable and ADSL), Captive portal, DNS Server, Snort, etc. hope it helps. -- "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090415/d2e13ae9/attachment-0002.html>
Rainer Duffner
2009-Apr-15 15:23 UTC
[CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
Rudi Ahlers schrieb:> Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring >I'd split these functions to a separate device, using pfSense on embedded hardware (ALIX or comparable). They have no point on a server. pfSense does this on 200 $-size hardware with 5 Watt energy consumption.> - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support >I don't think there's a free version for everything ;-) Zimbra is OK, but the commercial edition costs - same with OX and most other stuff. Given the complexity of the stuff involved, I'd say anything like this needs a commercial backer. Unless you only use mail.> - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > >For free? ;-)> I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works > for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer > to use 5. >I have a sense of deja-vu. Didn't we have all these questions and specs a couple of weeks ago? Rainer
Les Mikesell
2009-Apr-15 15:38 UTC
[CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
Rudi Ahlers wrote:> Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support > - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > > I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works > for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer > to use 5.What's the problem with clarkconnect? It's not particularly difficult to set these functions up yourself starting with a stock Centos if you intend to maintain them yourself (SME's main attraction is that the configuration interface is easy enough for anyone to use). With other appliance-type distributions you might find it easier to split the firewall and application services onto different boxes. ipcop and ebox look somewhat promising. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
muhammad panji
2009-Apr-16 23:05 UTC
[CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support > - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > > I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works > for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer > to use 5.clarkconnect 5 is on beta 2 http://distrowatch.com/5407 just wait a little while :) -- Muhammad Panji http://sumodirjo.wordpress.com