Jim Canfield
2007-Oct-05 18:49 UTC
[asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO?
I've been considering replacing a PRI with SIP or IAX trunks. The monthly cost difference is marginal, but it would save a bit on the hardware side and soft trunks would be easier to manage. I can't help but wonder what I would be giving up? I'd like to hear some "lessons learned" from those who are doing it or decided, for whatever reason, it's a bad idea. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jcanfield.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 341 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071005/d5f06f82/attachment.vcf
Jeremy Mann
2007-Oct-05 19:02 UTC
[asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO?
Without knowing more, Why fix what isn't broken? -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jim Canfield Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 1:50 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO? I've been considering replacing a PRI with SIP or IAX trunks. The monthly cost difference is marginal, but it would save a bit on the hardware side and soft trunks would be easier to manage. I can't help but wonder what I would be giving up? I'd like to hear some "lessons learned" from those who are doing it or decided, for whatever reason, it's a bad idea. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed. If you are the intended recipient, further disclosures are prohibited without proper authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, printing, or use of this information is strictly prohibited and possibly a violation of federal or state law and regulations. If you have received this information in error, please notify Texas Health Management Group immediately at 1-817-310-4999. Texas Health Management Group, its subsidiaries, and affiliates hereby claim all applicable privileges related to this information. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Stephen Bosch
2007-Oct-05 19:08 UTC
[asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO?
Jim Canfield wrote:> I've been considering replacing a PRI with SIP or IAX trunks. The > monthly cost difference is marginal, but it would save a bit on the > hardware side and soft trunks would be easier to manage. I can't help > but wonder what I would be giving up? I'd like to hear some "lessons > learned" from those who are doing it or decided, for whatever reason, > it's a bad idea.Here's what you'd be giving up: reliability. If consistent call quality and reliability is what you want, SIP or IAX on unmanaged, public networks is not for you. If you can arrange private bandwidth to a carrier's POP where you can pull telco SIP channels that get you right onto the PSTN, then great. Not many locations have this available yet. If cheap is what you want and you're not too concerned about service quality, SIP and IAX can be a good option. As it appears you're running a clinic, I would recommend against dumping your PRI. Cheers, -Stephen-
Jim Canfield
2007-Oct-05 19:11 UTC
[asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO?
Jeremy Mann wrote:> Without knowing more, Why fix what isn't broken? >I should have stated, the PRI is on an existing PBX not asterisk. My goal was to reuse the existing PBX PRI card to interface with asterisk.> I've been considering replacing a PRI with SIP or IAX trunks. The monthly cost difference is marginal, but it would save a bit on the hardware side and soft trunks would be easier to manage. I can't help but wonder what I would be giving up? I'd like to hear some "lessons learned" from those who are doing it or decided, for whatever reason, it's a bad idea. > > > > >
Steve Totaro
2007-Oct-05 19:18 UTC
[asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO?
Jim Canfield wrote:> I've been considering replacing a PRI with SIP or IAX trunks. The > monthly cost difference is marginal, but it would save a bit on the > hardware side and soft trunks would be easier to manage. I can't help > but wonder what I would be giving up? I'd like to hear some "lessons > learned" from those who are doing it or decided, for whatever reason, > it's a bad idea.If your provider will be providing the SIP trunks then it might be OK. Otherwise I would stick with PRI. My lessons learned are that you cannot control the public internet and traffic shaping and QoS are not useful most of the time. I would only consider a point to point if this your phone system is mission critical. Explain a little more on who would replace your service and over what facilities. Surely, you are not going to get IAX service from your internet provider. Thanks, Steve Totaro
Darren Wright
2007-Oct-05 19:34 UTC
[asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO?
"Danger Wil Robinson!" Don't do it. If the cost is negligible, you are going to give up a huge control / reliability factor. Unless you dedicated a T1 to just voice, you'll not be able to guarantee quality. I've had a few small companies use VOIP trunks with POTS backup, but I wouldn't even consider switching a PRI to SIP. ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com on behalf of Jim Canfield Sent: Fri 10/5/2007 2:49 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO? I've been considering replacing a PRI with SIP or IAX trunks. The monthly cost difference is marginal, but it would save a bit on the hardware side and soft trunks would be easier to manage. I can't help but wonder what I would be giving up? I'd like to hear some "lessons learned" from those who are doing it or decided, for whatever reason, it's a bad idea. This message was sent from D2 Technology, INC. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 4308 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071005/e3c227ae/attachment-0001.bin
Jim Canfield
2007-Oct-05 19:41 UTC
[asterisk-users] Replace full PRI with SIP/IAX trunks...YES/NO?
Steve Totaro wrote:> > > If your provider will be providing the SIP trunks then it might be OK. > Otherwise I would stick with PRI. > > My lessons learned are that you cannot control the public internet and > traffic shaping and QoS are not useful most of the time. I would only > consider a point to point if this your phone system is mission critical. > > Explain a little more on who would replace your service and over what > facilities. Surely, you are not going to get IAX service from your > internet provider. >Thanks Steve, QOS has been a concern, I was told by my data provider (Cox Communications) I "might" see some SIP trunking options directly through them by the end of the year which would be fantastic given I have their fiber to my MDF. I currently have a test IAX trunk setup with an ITSP but I just realized they would be leasing a T-1 from BELL to provide any QOS....so kindof pointless, unless it's a LOT cheaper. Guess I knew the answer, just needed you guys prop me up. -jc
Maybe Matching Threads
- RE How to break pri DID to multiple SIP Trunks
- IAX2 softphones can't (won't?) use PRI trunks....
- IAX softphone fails through PRI trunks with Hangup
- Passing PRI traffic to remote * over IAX
- Terminating IAX calls in E1 PRI interface - what do I need to be able to send arbitrary caller id to called party ?