asterisk users - Apr 2006 - call center running Asterisk-sound quality-critical!

Yes. That's is the one. It is resolved now. 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tamas
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:26 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] call center running Asterisk-sound
quality-critical!


Wai Wu wrote:
> Except that mixmonitor still has a bug in it. 
>   
What kind of bug? Issue number?
FYI: yesterday one issue has been fixed :D
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6457
Did you mean that type of bug? If something else, please let us know...

T.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P.
> Fleming
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:45 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] call center running Asterisk -sound 
> quality-critical!
>
> Matt Roth wrote:
>
>   
>> These statements seem contradictory.  I know of no way (short of a 
>> custom patch) to tell Monitor() to mix the in and out legs prior to 
>> writing them to disk.  On the other hand, MixMonitor() does just that
>> and I believe it also buffers the writes in a way that circumvents 
>> the
>>     
>
>   
>> I/O bottleneck associated with Monitor().
>>     
>
> Both of these statements are correct.
> ______________________________________________
>   
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users