Bert Gunter
2011-Aug-03 14:49 UTC
[R] Combining multiple dependent variables for machine learning -- fortunes candidate?
I thought Sarah's reply was great and, alas, should probably be templated for this list. Not sure it fits as a fortunes package entry, but I thought it at least worthy of consideration. Cheers, Bert>> ... >> I appreciate any suggestions for this problem.Sarah Goslee replied:> Suggestions? Yes. Read the posting guide and follow it. It isn't clear that > this is even an R question, since you don't tell us anything about the > packages or functions you are using, or about your data. There aren't > any actual questions in your message, and your problem statement > is exceedingly vague. >....> > Sarah > > -- > Sarah Goslee > http://www.functionaldiversity.org >-- "Men by nature long to get on to the ultimate truths, and will often be impatient with elementary studies or fight shy of them. If it were possible to reach the ultimate truths without the elementary studies usually prefixed to them, these would not be preparatory studies but superfluous diversions." -- Maimonides (1135-1204) Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics
Reasonably Related Threads
- Inserting column in between -- "better" way?
- "Justify" PCA? -- was: Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
- R Style Guide -- Was Post-hoc tests in MASS using glm.nb
- FW: FW: Unable to Plot using headers (converting to Numeric)
- linear regression in a data.frame using recast -- A fortunes candidate??