Thanks for your help with this behaviour.
I have tried a few other things, and it looks like it is an issue of using the
clipboard to copy it in rather than saving to a
file then copying.
A bit odd, but maybe nothing to do with R!
Matt Redding
-----Original Message-----
From: Redding, Matthew
Sent: Saturday, 10 January 2004 2:09 PM
To: 'Prof Brian Ripley'
Subject: RE: [R] Letter Spacing
Hi All,
Thanks to everyone who answered the question!
Just a little more information on the behaviour.
I re-installed the latest version of R, and re-installed version 1.51.
I ran the r program that produces the graph in each of the versions.
The latest version produces compressed text when they are inserted in Word 2000,
while the older version did not.
I am pretty sure it is a real effect, since it has occured with new
installations, the same
r program, and the same version of windows and word.
I have only tested it with enhanced metafont files, have yet to try it with pdf.
Using pdf is a good call though....usually fixes a lot of word bad behaviour.
Thanks,
Matt Redding
-----Original Message-----
From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 6:33 PM
To: Redding, Matthew
Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Letter Spacing
We are not aware of any related changes between R 1.5.1 and R 1.8.1, and
no one else has reported a problem. Text strings in R graphics are
plotted directly in the font specified and not as individual letters, so
there is nothing you can do about letter spacing in R.
I would first cross-check that the same fonts have been used in both
systems (and that includes exact sizes of fonts), then check that a
metafile viewer (Windows XP comes with one, for example) shows the
difference. I am afraid that most of the problems we have investigated
with metafiles were traced to bugs in Word.
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Redding, Matthew wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been trying to make some adjustments to the graphics in a paper I
wrote some time ago, for which the comments have been
> returned from the reviewers.
>
> I always use R for publication graphics...I think it does the best job
available, for the things I am interested in.
>
> I could not get my graphics in R 181 to look the same as the old ones
(completed 8 months ago),
> the text seemed a bit squashed
> together when I copied graphics as meta-files into word.
>
> I have found that by re-installing version 1.51, the graphics look as nice
as the previous ones, with the text nicely spaced.
>
> Is there a "par" parameters that will adjust the letter spacing,
so I can use version 181 for this type of job?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt R. Redding
> Senior Environmental Scientist, Intensive livestock and sheep
> Agency for Food and Fibre Sciences
> Department of Primary Industries
>
> Telephone 07 4688 1372 Fax 07 4688 1192
> Email matthew.redding at dpi.qld.gov.au
> Website http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/ilsu/ Call Centre 13 25 23
>
> ********************************DISCLAIMER******************...{{dropped}}
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>
>
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
********************************DISCLAIMER******************...{{dropped}}
